Cited by 444Particle accelerators and beam dynamicsSuperconducting Materials and ApplicationsParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Superconducting TESLA cavities

Open access

Abstract

The conceptional design of the proposed linear electron-positron collider TESLA is based on 9-cell 1.3 GHz superconducting niobium cavities with an accelerating gradient of ${E}_{\mathrm{acc}}\ensuremath{\ge}25\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m}$ at a quality factor ${Q}_{0}\ensuremath{\ge}5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{9}$. The design goal for the cavities of the TESLA Test Facility (TTF) linac was set to the more moderate value of ${E}_{\mathrm{acc}}\ensuremath{\ge}15\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m}$. In a first series of 27 industrially produced TTF cavities the average gradient at ${Q}_{0}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{9}$ was measured to be $20.1\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}6.2\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m}$, excluding a few cavities suffering from serious fabrication or material defects. In the second production of 24 TTF cavities, additional quality control measures were introduced, in particular, an eddy-current scan to eliminate niobium sheets with foreign material inclusions and stringent prescriptions for carrying out the electron-beam welds. The average gradient of these cavities at ${Q}_{0}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{9}$ amounts to $25.0\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}3.2\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m}$ with the exception of one cavity suffering from a weld defect. Hence only a moderate improvement in production and preparation techniques will be needed to meet the ambitious TESLA goal with an adequate safety margin. In this paper we present a detailed description of the design, fabrication, and preparation of the TESLA Test Facility cavities and their associated components and report on cavity performance in test cryostats and with electron beam in the TTF linac. The ongoing research and development towards higher gradients is briefly addressed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevstab.3.092001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nonuniform heating of the sample breaks the one-dimensional assumption.

    “The first important effect is the nonuniform heating of the sample that breaks the one-dimensional assumption.”

    From Thermal properties measurements using laser flash technique at cryogenic temperature (2002) · cites this paper as [7]

    The “Thermal instability and field emission” section says that heating from rf losses is nonuniform across a superconducting cavity wall, with larger temperature rises at certain spots. It does not discuss a one-dimensional assumption or state that nonuniform heating breaks one. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the presence of a hot or cold centre effect, the sample heating is faster or slower than ideal, so thermal diffusivity is overestimated or underestimated during the transient.

    “In presence of a hot (or cold) centre effect the sample heating results faster (or slower) than the ideal case and so the thermal diffusivity is overestimated (or underestimated) during the transient [7].”

    From Thermal properties measurements using laser flash technique at cryogenic temperature (2002) · cites this paper as [7]

    The “Thermal instability and field emission” section discusses localized heating in superconducting cavities, while “2. Heat conduction in niobium” discusses thermal conductivity (p. 092001-3). Searches for the hot or cold centre effect and for faster or slower sample heating found no passage addressing transient thermal-diffusivity estimates. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. C. Reece, 1995, Proceedings of the 1995 Particle Accelerator Conference and International Conference on High Energy Accelerators, Dallas, Texas
  2. G. Müller, 1988, Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Argonne, Illinois, 1988,
  3. B. Bonin, 1996, Proceedings of the CERN Accelerator School, Hamburg, 1995,
  4. W. Weingarten, Proceedings of the CERN Accelerator School, Hamburg, 1995
  5. B. Bonin, 1996, Supercond. Sci. Technology, 9, 453, 10.1088/0953-2048/9/6/003 · DOI
  6. K. Schulze, 1981, J. Met., 33, 33
  7. A. Boucheffa, 1996, Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, 1995,
  8. J. Matricon, 1967, Phys. Lett., 24A, 241, 10.1016/0375-9601(67)90412-4 · DOI
  9. T. Hays, Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, 1995
  10. C. Benvenuti, Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Santa Fe, 1999
  11. R. H. Fowler, 1928, Proc. R. Soc. London A, 119, 173, 10.1098/rspa.1928.0091 · DOI
  12. H. Padamsee, 1998, RF Superconductivity for Accelerators, 10.1063/1.882759 · DOI
  13. H. Padamsee, 1992, Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Superconductivity, Hamburg, Germany, 1991,
  14. A. W. Chao, 1999, Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering, 10.1142/3818 · DOI
  15. W. Albach, 1957, Z. Angew. Phys., 9, 111
  16. W. D. Möller, Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1999
  17. J. Tückmantel, Proceedings of the 1995 Particle Accelerator Conference and International Conference on High Energy Accelerators, Dallas, 1995
  18. J. Graber, 1994, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 350, 572, 10.1016/0168-9002(94)91260-2 · DOI
  19. P. Bernard, 1992, Proceedings of the Third European Particle Accelerator Conference, Berlin, 1992,
  20. H. Padamsee, 1990, Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Tsukuba, Japan, 1989,
  21. H. Safa, Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, 1995
  22. W. Singer, 1998, Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Abano Terme, Italy, 1997,
  23. A. Brinkmann, Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Abano Terme, Italy, 1997
  24. K. Zapfe-Düren, Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Abano Terme, Italy, 1997
  25. H.-D. Gräf, Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Hamburg, Germany, 1991
  26. S. Simrock, 1994, Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Newport News, Virginia, 1993,
  27. M. Liepe, 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 European Particle Accelerator Conference, Stockholm, Sweden,
  28. K. Saito, Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1999
  29. E. Kako, Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Santa Fe, 1999
  30. L. Lilje, Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Santa Fe, 1999
  31. P. Kneisel, Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Santa Fe, 1999
  32. P. Charrier, Proceedings of the 1998 European Particle Accelerator Conference, Stockholm, Sweden
  33. J. Knobloch, Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Santa Fe, 1999
  34. S. Bousson, Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Santa Fe, 1999
  35. T. Fujino, Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Santa Fe, 1999
  36. V. Palmieri, Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Abano Terme, Italy, 1997
  37. P. Kneisel, Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Santa Fe, 1999
  38. I. Gonin, Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Santa Fe, 1999
  39. P. Bosland, 1999, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond, 9, 896, 10.1109/77.783441 · DOI
  40. J. Sekutowicz, 1999, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 2, 062001, 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.2.062001 · DOI
  41. H. Chen, Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on rf Superconductivity, Santa Fe, 1999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aune, B., Bandelmann, R., Bloess, D., Bonin, B., Bosotti, A., Champion, M., Crawford, C., Deppe, G., Dwersteg, B., Edwards, D. A., Edwards, H. T., Ferrario, M., Fouaidy, M., Gall, P.-D., Gamp, A., Gössel, A., Graber, J., Hubert, D., Hüning, M., Juillard, M., Junquera, T., Kaiser, H., Kreps, G., Kuchnir, M., Lange, R., Leenen, M., Liepe, M., Lilje, L., Matheisen, A., Möller, W.-D., Mosnier, A., Padamsee, H., Pagani, C., Pekeler, M., Peters, H.-B., Peters, O., Proch, D., Rehlich, K., Reschke, D., Safa, H., Schilcher, T., Schmüser, P., Sekutowicz, J., Simrock, S., Singer, W., Tigner, M., Trines, D., Twarowski, K., Weichert, G., Weisend, J., Wojtkiewicz, J., Wolff, S., & Zapfe, K.
Affiliations
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
  • Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY (DE)
  • European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH)
  • Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano (IT)
  • Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (IT)
  • Institut de Physique Nucléaire d’Orsay (FR)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
Venue
Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams
Published
2000-09-22
Volume
3
Issue
9
Pages
092001-1-092001-25
ISSN
1098-4402 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1606549729
Cited by
444
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
FWCI
24.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DESY Publication Database (PUBDB) (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Superconducting Materials and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
Keywords
Tesla, superconducting cavities, niobium cavities, electron-positron linear collider, TESLA Test Facility, accelerating gradient, quality factor, cavity fabrication, electron beam welding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review