Cited by 17Laser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron LasersParticle accelerators and beam dynamics

Simulation of electron postacceleration in a two-stage laser wakefield accelerator

Open access
Reitsma, A. J. W., Leemans, W. P., Esarey, E., Schroeder, C. B., Kamp, L. P. J., Schep, T. J.·2002·Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams

Abstract

Electron bunches produced in self-modulated laser wakefield experiments usually have a broad energy distribution, with most electrons at low energy (1--3 MeV) and only a small fraction at high energy. We propose and investigate further acceleration of such bunches in a channel-guided resonant laser wakefield accelerator. Two-dimensional simulations with and without the effects of self-consistent beam loading are performed and compared. These results indicate that it is possible to trap about $40%$ of the injected bunch charge and accelerate this fraction to an average energy of about 50 MeV in a plasma channel of a few mm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevstab.5.051301

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reitsma, A. J. W., Leemans, W. P., Esarey, E., Schroeder, C. B., Kamp, L. P. J., & Schep, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Venue
Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams
Published
2002-05-28
Volume
5
Issue
5
ISSN
1098-4402 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098991221
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
Keywords
electron energy distribution, plasma channel, two-dimensional simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review