The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Erratum: Binary Black Hole Mergers in the First Advanced LIGO Observing Run [Phys. Rev. X 6 , 041015 (2016)]
Open accessAbstract
We report an error found in the implementation of the code of the LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations (LVC) as used in gravitational-wave-based estimations of possible deviations from the post-Newtonian (PN) terms expected in general relativity.The error concerned the 0.5 PN term and affected the results previously published for GW150914 [1] in Ref. [2], for GW151226 [3] in [4], and for GW170104 in Ref. [5].We corrected the error and present the reproduced results here, as well as in the respective Refs.[6,7].The main conclusion, that the results are consistent with general relativity, remains.The test for the parametrized post-Newtonian [8] deviations from the expected GR values relied on creating non-GR waveforms [2,9-13] and using them as potential matches for the observed waveforms [14][15][16][17].In these waveforms, implemented in the frequency domain, freedom was introduced by allowing the phase coefficients describing different powers of the post-Newtonian parameter (equivalently, powers of the frequency) to assume a range of values not only the particular values prescribed by GR.However, a coding bug was introduced, identically zeroing the deviations at 0.5 PN in the inspiral regime (as in GR).Hence, the 0.5 PN deviations were absent in the phasing formula, though not in the junction conditions that relate the inspiral regime to the intermediate regime.Any constraints obtained in Refs.[2,4,5] only resulted from the latter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, N., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., Agarwal, D., et al. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 · Cited by 1,754
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, A., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.122002 · Cited by 755
Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update
Caprini, C., Chala, M., Dorsch, G. C., Hindmarsh, M., Huber, S. J., Konstandin, T., Kozaczuk, J., Nardini, G., No, J. M., Rummukainen, K., et al. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/024 · Cited by 729
Erratum: Tests of General Relativity with GW150914 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 , 221101 (2016)]
Abbott, B. P., & LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration 1, 2. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.129902 · Cited by 580
Self-citationXu, Y., Li, G., Harko, T., & Liang, S.-D. (2019) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7207-4 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Abbott, B. P., & LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations <a href="#n1">1, <. H.
- Venue
- Physical Review X
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2018-09-18
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2160-3308 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2889716526
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Erratum: Binary Black Hole Mergers in the First Advanced LIGO Observing Run [Phys. Rev. X 6 , 041015 (2016)]. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevx.8.039903
- The paper
- Abbott, B. P., & LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations <a href="#n1">1, <. H. (2018). Erratum: Binary Black Hole Mergers in the First Advanced LIGO Observing Run [Phys. Rev. X 6 , 041015 (2016)]. Physical Review X. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.8.039903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.