ExEnDiff: An Experiment-Guided Diffusion Model for Protein Conformational Ensemble Generation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Understanding protein conformation is key to understanding their function. Importantly, most proteins adopt multiple conformations with nontrivial ensemble distributions that change depending on their environment to perform functions like catalysis, signaling, and transport. Recently, machine learning techniques, especially deep generative models, have been employed to develop protein conformation generators. These models, known as unified protein ensemble samplers, are trained on the Protein Data Bank (PDB) dataset and can generate diverse protein conformation ensembles given a protein sequence. However, their reliance solely on structural data from the PDB, which primarily captures folded protein states, restricts the diversity of the generated ensembles and can result in physically unrealistic conformations. In this paper, we overcome these challenges by introducing ExEnDiff, an experiment-guided diffusion model for protein conformation generation. ExEnDiff integrates experimental measurements as a physical prior, enabling the generation of protein conformations with desired properties. Our experiments on a variety of fast-folding and intrinsically disordered proteins demonstrate that ExEnDiff significantly advances the capabilities of current unified protein ensemble samplers. With little computational cost, ExEnDiff can capture important proteins' configuration properties and the underlying Boltzmann distribution, paving the way for a next-generation molecular dynamics engine. We further demonstrate the effectiveness of ExEnDiff to capture conformational changes in the presence of mutations and as an efficient tool for determining a reasonable collective variable space for protein ensembles. With these results, ExEnDiff is well poised to push the study of protein ensembles into a data-rich regime currently available to few problems in biology.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Predicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold2
Wayment-Steele, H. K., Ojoawo, A., Otten, R., Apitz, J. M., Pitsawong, W., Hömberger, M., Ovchinnikov, S., Colwell, L., & Kern, D. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06832-9 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Das, P., Moll, M., Stamati, H., Kavraki, L. E., & Clementi, C. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0603553103 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Variational approach to molecular kinetics
Nüske, F., Keller, B. G., Pérez-Hernández, G., Mey, A. S. J. S., & Noé, F. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct4009156 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Determination of reaction coordinates via locally scaled diffusion map
Rohrdanz, M. A., Zheng, W., Maggioni, M., & Clementi, C. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3569857 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
SPEACH_AF: Sampling protein ensembles and conformational heterogeneity with Alphafold2
Stein, R. A., & Mchaourab, H. S. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010483 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Yu, Z., Lindsay, R. J., Lin, G., Chen, M., Sahoo, A., & Hanson, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Flatiron Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sahoo, Abhilash
- Venue
- PRX Life
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2025-06-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2835-8279 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4411179305
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 13
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PRX Life (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DMS-2053746, DMS-2134209, ECCS-2328241, CBET-2347401, OAC-2311848, EAR-2246687)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0023161, DE-SC0024583)
- Fusion Energy Sciences
- Simons Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- protein conformational ensembles, diffusion models, physical priors, fast-folding proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins, Boltzmann distribution, protein conformational diversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review