Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,289

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Exchange Narrowing in Paramagnetic Resonance

Anderson, P. W., Weiss, P. R.·1953·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

In this paper the problem of the line shape in paramagnetic resonance when large exchange interaction is present is discussed from the standpoint of a simplified mathematical model. The mathematical model can be called the model of "random frequency modulation": It is assumed that the atom absorbs a single frequency, which varies over a distribution determined by the dipolar local fields, but that this frequency varies randomly in time at a rate determined by the exchange interactions.The predicted line shape in the case in which exchange is large is of resonance type in the observable center of the line, but falls off more rapidly in the wings. This line shape has been verified experimentally in a number of cases. This conclusion seems quite independent of any assumption about the type of random frequency modulation, etc. The quantitative conclusions are reached in the following way: It is suspected, since the exchange motion is the superposition of the effects of a number of neighbors which is not particularly small, that a good approximation to the modulation function is Gaussian noise with a Gaussian spectrum. This, of course, is what would result from the superposition of a large number of rather small effects. Under this assumption both the second moment (which is independent of exchange) and the fourth moment of the line shape can be calculated. This kind of modulation is the simplest one which does give a finite fourth moment; a Markoffian, or "jump," type of modulation, which might seem more reasonable at first, does not. These moments are then compared with the moments computed by Van Vleck [Phys. Rev. 74, 1168 (1948)] to fix the two adjustable parameters, mean square frequency, and average rate of change of frequency, of the theory.The result as to line breadth, which is essentially $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\cong}\frac{{〈(\ensuremath{\Delta}{\ensuremath{\omega}}^{2})〉}_{\mathrm{Av}} \mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}}{\frac{J}{\ensuremath{\hbar}}},$ if $J$ is the exchange integral, can be compared with observed line breadths by estimating $J$ from Curie-Weiss constants for a number of materials. The results are quite satisfactory if the theory is extended in two ways: (a) When the exchange frequency is larger than the resonance frequency, it can be shown that the off-diagonal elements of the dipolar interaction must be included, leading to a line-width larger by a factor of roughly 10/3; (b) in a number of cases hyperfine and Stark splitting is contributing importantly to the width.The good agreement with experiment in the cases we have investigated leads us to believe that a quantitative approach to the paramagnetic resonance line breadth problem, using only the already known concepts of dipolar interaction, exchange narrowing, and fine structure splitting, will probably explain all the observed phenomena.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.25.269

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,289

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, P. W., & Weiss, P. R.
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
1953-01-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
269-276
ISSN
0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066860838
Cited by
1,289
References
0
FWCI
10.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exchange Narrowing in Paramagnetic Resonance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.25.269
The paper
Anderson, P. W., & Weiss, P. R. (1953). Exchange Narrowing in Paramagnetic Resonance. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.25.269

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.