Erratum: The Physical Structure of General Relativity
Open accessAbstract
Throughout Sec. 3, y should be r.On p. 465: the erst equation should read 40; in the On p. 468, in the first and second equations: v should third line of text in column 2, x' should be X', and in be V, s should be 5, and v should be r, and also in line the second equation in column 2, should appear Bg;;/Boo .4 after the first equation, t should be r.On p. 467, in line ii of column 2, read Il, ; in place of Ii'g.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The collapsing matter undergoes a nonsingular bounce and then expands as a new, closed universe whose total energy is zero.
“Instead, the collapsing matter undergoes a nonsingular bounce [21] and then expands as a new, closed universe [4,5,22] whose total energy is zero [23].”
From A nonsingular, anisotropic universe in a black hole with torsion and particle production (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
Citation [23] is attached specifically to the claim that the new universe’s total energy is zero. The passages in our copy (labeled Abstract; no page given) contain erratum corrections, not a discussion of a universe’s total energy. Searches for zero energy and gravitational energy in a closed universe found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nonsingular, big-bounce cosmology from spinor-torsion coupling
Popławski, N. (2012) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.107502 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY
Popławski, N. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/832/2/96 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
A nonsingular, anisotropic universe in a black hole with torsion and particle production
Popławski, N. J. (2021) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-021-02790-7 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sciama, D. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sciama, D. W.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1964-10-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1103-1103
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2982484167
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- general relativity, Einstein field equations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
