The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linked-Cluster Expansions for the Nuclear Many-Body Problem
Abstract
The Goldstone expansion is rederived by elementary time-independent methods, starting from Brillouin-Wigner (BW) perturbation theory. Interaction energy terms $\ensuremath{\Delta}E$ are expanded out of the BW energy denominators, and the series is then rearranged to obtain the linked-cluster result. Similar algebraic methods lead to the linked expansions for the total wave function (Hugenholtz) and the expectation value of a general operator (Thouless). Starting again with a degenerate version of BW perturbation theory, these methods are used to obtain the Bloch-Horowitz energy expansion, as well as the corresponding wave function, expectation-value, and transition-amplitude expansions. A "reduced" form of the Block-Horowitz expansion is described, and also a "completely linked" version. The latter is suggested as a tool for investigating superfiuid phenomena in nuclear matter, and for establishing contact with the Landau theory of Fermi liquids. The physical interpretation of these expansions is carefully studied, especially with regard to nuclear applications, to determine how they handle such "physical" features as antisymmetry, self-energy effects, wave-function renormalizations, and the distinction between "true" and "model" single-particle occupation probabilities. The problem of a correct theoretical definition for the shell-model potential is carefully examined, and a specific theory is presented. These expansions are seen to form a convenient and very powerful set of tools for studying the structure of actual nuclei.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods of Theoretical Physics
Morse, P. M., Feshbach, H., & Hill, E. L. (1954) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1933765 · Cited by 13,197
Cited by
Coupled-cluster method for multideterminantal reference states
Jeziorski, B., & Monkhorst, H. J. (1981) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.24.1668 · Cited by 873
Convergence of an improved CIPSI algorithm
Evangelisti, S., Daudey, J.-P., & Malrieu, J.-P. (1983) · Chemical Physics · doi:10.1016/0301-0104(83)85011-3 · Cited by 438
Use of Cluster Expansion Methods in the Open-Shell Correlation Problem
Mukherjee, D., & Pal, S. (1989) · Advances in Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3276(08)60629-2 · Cited by 403
New perspectives in multireference perturbation theory: the n-electron valence state approach
Angeli, C., Pastore, M., & Cimiraglia, R. (2007) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/s00214-006-0207-0 · Cited by 281
A Guided Tour of ab initio Nuclear Many-Body Theory
Hergert, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00379 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- BRANDOW, B. H.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1967-10-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 771-828
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018632465
- Cited by
- 1,273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linked-Cluster Expansions for the Nuclear Many-Body Problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.39.771
- The paper
- BRANDOW, B. H. (1967). Linked-Cluster Expansions for the Nuclear Many-Body Problem. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.39.771
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.