The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Photon antibunching
Abstract
A review is given of recent theoretical studies devoted to the problem of generating radiation fields that exhibit the opposite of the well-known bunching of photons observed in light from thermal sources, the so-called antibunching effect. It is made clear that this phenomenon reflects the corpuscular nature of light and, hence, cannot be interpreted in terms of classical electrodynamics, needing, instead, the quantum-mechanical formalism for its description. It is shown in some detail that nonlinear interaction mechanisms like multiphoton absorption and parametric three-wave interaction are suited to change the photon statistical properties of incident (in most cases coherent) light such that the output field will be endowed with antibunching properties. Special emphasis is given to the problem of correctly specifying the dimensions of the mode volume occurring in the usual single-mode treatment of the field, which is, in fact, of great practical interest, since the magnitude of the antibunching effect is determined by the inverse average number of photons contained in that volume. In a later section it is pointed out that destructive interference with a coherent reference beam provides a means of (a) effectively enhancing photon antibunching that is already present in a high-intensity field, through reduction of the intensity, and (b) transforming phase fluctuations produced in a Kerr medium into antibunching-type intensity fluctuations. On the other hand, there exists a way of directly generating light with antibunching properties, the physical mechanism being resonance fluorescence from a single atom. The main features of this technique, both theoretical and experimental, are outlined, including a discussion of the first experimental results obtained a few years ago.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
Correlation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light
BROWN, R. H., & TWISS, R. Q. (1956) · Nature · doi:10.1038/177027a0 · Cited by 2,573
Observation of Simultaneity in Parametric Production of Optical Photon Pairs
Burnham, D. C., & Weinberg, D. L. (1970) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.25.84 · Cited by 1,111
Evidence for the quantum nature of light
Walls, D. F. (1979) · Nature · doi:10.1038/280451a0 · Cited by 224
Cited by
Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits
Gu, X., Kockum, A. F., Miranowicz, A., Liu, Y.-X., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.002 · Cited by 1,307
Imaging electronic quantum motion with light
Dixit, G., Vendrell, O., & Santra, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1202226109 · Cited by 177
Nonclassical fields in a linear directional coupler
Lai, W. K., Buek, V., & Knight, P. L. (1991) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.43.6323 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Paul, H.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1982-10-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1061-1102
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4234705936
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photon antibunching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.54.1061
- The paper
- Paul, H. (1982). Photon antibunching. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.54.1061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.