Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 485

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Standard solar models and the uncertainties in predicted capture rates of solar neutrinos

Bahcall, John N., Huebner, Walter F., Lubow, Stephen H., Parker, Peter D., Ulrich, Roger K.·1982·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

The uncertainties that affect the prediction of solar neutrino fluxes are evaluated with the aid of standard solar models. The uncertainties are determined from available data for all measured quantities that are known to affect significantly the neutrino fluxes; these include nuclear reaction rates, the solar constant, and the primordial surface composition of the sun. Uncertainties in theoretical quantities (such as the stellar opacity, the equation of state, and the rate of the proton-proton reaction) are estimated from the range of values in published state-of-the-art calculations. The uncertainty in each neutrino flux that is caused by a specified uncertainty in any of the parameters is evaluated with the aid of a series of standard solar models that were constructed for this purpose; the results are expressed in terms of the logarithmic partial derivative of each flux with respect to each parameter. The effects on the neutrino fluxes of changing individual parameters by large amounts can usually be estimated to satisfactory accuracy by making use of the tabulated partial derivatives. An overall "effective $3\ensuremath{\sigma}$ level of uncertainty" is defined using the requirement that the true value should lie within the estimated range unless someone has made a mistake. Effective $3\ensuremath{\sigma}$ levels of uncertainty, as well as best estimates, are determined for the following possible detectors of solar neutrinos: $^{2}\mathrm{H}$, $^{7}\mathrm{Li}$, $^{37}\mathrm{Cl}$, $^{71}\mathrm{Ga}$, $^{79}\mathrm{Br}$, $^{81}\mathrm{Br}$, $^{97}\mathrm{Mo}$, $^{98}\mathrm{Mo}$, $^{115}\mathrm{In}$, and electron-neutrino scattering. The most important sources of uncertainty in the predicted capture rates are identified and discussed for each detector separately. For the $^{37}\mathrm{Cl}$ detector, the predicted capture rate is 7.6\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}3.3 (effective $3\ensuremath{\sigma}$ errors) SNU. The measured production rate is (Cleveland, Davis, and Rowley, 1981) 2.1\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.3 SNU ($1\ensuremath{\sigma}$ error). For a $^{71}\mathrm{Ga}$ detector, the expected capture rate is 106 (${1}_{\ensuremath{-}0.08}^{+0.12}$) SNU (also effective $3\ensuremath{\sigma}$ errors). The relatively small uncertainty quoted for the $^{71}\mathrm{Ga}$ detector is a direct result of the fact that $^{71}\mathrm{Ga}$ is primarily sensitive to neutrinos from the basic proton-proton reaction, the rate of which is determined largely by the observed solar luminosity. The Caltech and Munster measured values for the cross-section factor for the reaction $^{3}\mathrm{He}$($\ensuremath{\alpha}$,$\ensuremath{\gamma}$)$^{7}\mathrm{Be}$ are inconsistent with each other. The capture rates quoted above were obtained using the Caltech value for the cross-section factor. If the Munster value is used instead, then the predicted capture rate for the $^{37}\mathrm{Cl}$ experiment is 4.95\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2.1 SNU (effective $3\ensuremath{\sigma}$ errors) and, for the $^{71}\mathrm{Ga}$ experiment, 96.7 (${1}_{\ensuremath{-}0.08}^{+0.12}$) SNU (effective $3\ensuremath{\sigma}$ errors). In order for the best-estimate value to agree with the observation of Davis (1978) of 2 SNU for the $^{37}\mathrm{Cl}$ experiment, the cross-section factor ${S}_{34}(0)$ would have to be reduced by about $15\ensuremath{\sigma}$ to less than the Caltech value, i.e. to $7\ensuremath{\sigma}$ less than the Munster value. The characteristics of the standard solar model, constructed with the best available nuclear parameters, solar opacity, and equation of state, are presented in detail. The computational methods by which this and similar models were obtained are also described briefly. The primordial helium abundance inferred with the aid of standard solar models is $Y=0.25\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.01$. The complementary relation between observations of solar neutrinos and of the normal modes of oscillation of the sun is examined. It is shown that the splitting of the observed large-$n$, small-$l$, $p$-mode (five minute) oscillations of the sun primarily originates in the outer ten percent of the solar mass, while the neutrinos from $^{8}\mathrm{B}$ beta decay originate primarily in the inner five percent of the solar mass. The solar luminosity, and the flux of neutrinos from the proton-proton reaction, come mostly from an intermediate region.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.54.767

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 485

Metadata

Authors
Bahcall, J. N., Huebner, W. F., Lubow, S. H., Parker, P. D., & Ulrich, R. K.
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
1982-07-01
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
767-799
ISSN
0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100260860
Cited by
485
References
0
FWCI
22.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standard solar models and the uncertainties in predicted capture rates of solar neutrinos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.54.767
The paper
Bahcall, J. N., Huebner, W. F., Lubow, S. H., Parker, P. D., & Ulrich, R. K. (1982). Standard solar models and the uncertainties in predicted capture rates of solar neutrinos. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.54.767

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.