Cited by 436Gamma-ray bursts and supernovaeAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena

Astrophysical blastwaves

Ostriker, Jeremiah P., McKee, Christopher F.·1988·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

The authors present a general discussion of spherical, nonrelativistic blastwaves in an astrophysical context. A variety of effects has been included: expansion of the ambient medium, gravitation, and an embedded fluid of clouds capable of exchanging mass, energy, or momentum with the medium. The authors also consider cases of energy injection due either to a central source or to detonations. Cosmological solutions are extensively treated. Most attention is devoted to problems in which it is permissible to assume self-similarity, as in the prototype Sedov-Taylor blastwave. A general virial theorem for blastwaves is derived. For self-similar blastwaves, the radius varies as a power of the time, ${R}_{s}\ensuremath{\propto}{t}^{\ensuremath{\eta}}$. The integral properties of the solution are completely specified by two dimensionless numbers measuring the relative importance of thermal and kinetic energy. The authors find certain exact kinematical relations and a variety of analytic approximations to determine these numbers with varying degrees of accuracy. The approximations may be based on assumptions about the internal density distributions (e.g., shell-like), pressure distribution, or velocity distribution. In many cases exact conditions from, for example, boundary conditions or other constraints may be used to determine unspecified parameters. One new set of exact integral constraints has been derived. The various approximation schemes are tested with known solutions. The authors find that for blastwaves in which the flow extends to the origin, the assumption that the internal velocity is linear with radius is reasonably accurate. For blastwaves in which an interior vacuum develops, the equally simple approximation of constant interior velocity is accurate. These lowest-order approximations are shown to give numerical coefficients in the relation $R=\mathrm{const}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{t}^{\ensuremath{\eta}}$ which are accurate to about 1-2%. The higher-order approximations show an accuracy that in some cases equals that obtained, to date, by direct numerical integration. In addition to the new methods presented, the authors have obtained new results for evaporative blastwaves, impeded blastwaves, blastwaves with cloud crushing, bubbles, cosmological blastwaves (self-similar and non-self-similar, radiative and nonradiative), blastwaves in a wind, and detonations. Some of the new results found are exact. Included are the radiative, cosmological self-similar solution, appropriate to the universe ($z>10$) when inverse Compton cooling is efficient [$\mathrm{ln}R=\mathrm{const}+\frac{(\mathrm{ln}t)(15+\sqrt{17})}{24}$], and certain properties of the solutions mentioned above. In a series of appendixes several related issues are treated: energy conservation for multicomponent fluid in an expanding universe; central and edge derivatives of physical quantities in self-similar adiabatic blastwaves; shock jump conditions including energy input (detonations), and a variety of other matters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.60.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The general solution for a blast wave in an isotropic medium is self-similar, with shock radius and velocity given as power laws rs(t) ∝ t^η and vs(t) = η rs/t.

    “The general solution for a Blast-Wave (BW) in an isotropic medium is self-similar for which the radius and the velocity of the shock front, rs , at any time, t , is given as simple power laws, rs ( t ) ∝ t η and vs ( t ) = η rs / t .”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Ostriker & McKee 1988

  • For a power-law density profile, the wind-driven shock solution remains the same except that η=3/(5-α) and σ≈1.2.

    “The solution for a power law density profile practically remains the same except that η = 3 / (5 -α ) and σ ≈ 1 . 2 (Ostriker & McKee 1988).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Ostriker & McKee 1988

  • For a power-law density profile ρ(r)=ρ0(r/r0)^-α, the shock radius and velocity imply η=2/(5-α).

    “For a given power-law density profile, ρ ( r ) = ρ 0 ( r / r 0 ) -α , the shock radius and velocity are then written as”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Ostriker & McKee 1988

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 81 · Cited by 436

Authors
Ostriker, J. P., & McKee, C. F.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
1988-01-01
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
1-68
ISSN
0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4237629461
Cited by
436
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
self-similarity, virial theorem, inverse Compton cooling, detonation, approximate analytical solutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review