Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 937

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Solar models, neutrino experiments, and helioseismology

Bahcall, John N., Ulrich, Roger K.·1988·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

The event rates and their recognized uncertainties are calculated for eleven solar neutrino experiments using accurate solar models. The same solar models are used to evaluate the frequency spectrum of the $p$ and $g$ oscillation modes of the sun and to compare with existing observations. A numerical table of the characteristics of the standard solar model is presented. Improved values have been calculated for all of the neutrino absorption cross sections evaluating the uncertainties for each neutrino source and detector as well as the best estimates. The neutrino capture rate calculated from the standard solar model for the $^{37}\mathrm{Cl}$ experiment is 7.9(1\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.33) SNU, which spans the total theoretical range; the rate observed by Davis and his associates is (2.0\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.3) SNU. The ratio of the observed to the predicted flux at Earth of neutrinos from $^{8}\mathrm{B}$ decay lies in the range $0\ensuremath{\le}[\frac{\ensuremath{\phi}{(^{8}\mathrm{B})}_{\mathrm{observed}}}{\ensuremath{\phi}{(^{8}\mathrm{B})}_{\mathrm{predicted}}}]\ensuremath{\le}0.5$. The recent results from the Kamiokande II electron scattering experiment confirm this conclusion. This discrepancy between calculation and observation is the solar neutrino problem. Measurements of the energy spectrum of solar neutrinos can discriminate between suggested solutions of the solar neutrino problem. Nonstandard solar models, many examples of which are also calculated in this paper, preserve the shape of the energy spectrum from individual neutrino sources, whereas most proposed weak-interaction explanations imply altered neutrino energy spectra. Detailed energy spectra of individual neutrino sources are presented as well as a composite solar neutrino spectrum. hep neutrinos from the $^{3}\mathrm{He}+p$ reaction, probe a different region of the solar interior than do $^{8}\mathrm{B}$ neutrinos. Measurements of the very rare but highest-energy hep neutrinos are possible in proposed experiments using electron scattering, $^{2}\mathrm{H}$, and $^{40}\mathrm{Ar}$ detectors. The standard solar model predicts $p$-mode oscillation frequencies that agree to within about 0.5% with the measured frequencies and reproduce well the overall dispersion relation of the modes. However, there are several small but significant discrepancies between the measured and observed frequencies. The complementarity of helioseismology and solar neutrino experiments is demonstrated by constructing a solar model with a drastically altered nuclear energy generation that eliminates entirely the important high-energy $^{8}\mathrm{B}$ and $^{7}\mathrm{Be}$ neutrinos, but which affects by less than 0.01% the calculated $p$-mode oscillation frequencies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.60.297

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 937

Metadata

Authors
Bahcall, J. N., & Ulrich, R. K.
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
1988-04-01
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
297-372
ISSN
0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035675492
Cited by
937
References
0
FWCI
62.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solar models, neutrino experiments, and helioseismology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.60.297
The paper
Bahcall, J. N., & Ulrich, R. K. (1988). Solar models, neutrino experiments, and helioseismology. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.60.297

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.