Cited by 402Particle Detector Development and PerformanceIon-surface interactions and analysisRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry

Straggling in thin silicon detectors

Bichsel, Hans·1988·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

Experimental and theoretical data for dielectric functions, x-ray absorption coefficients, and generalized oscillator strengths needed for a description of the energy-loss spectrum of fast charged particles in solid silicon are given. Theories used to calculate spectra of total energy loss ("straggling spectra") are described. The convolution method is used to calculate straggling functions for thin silicon absorbers. They are compared with those obtained from other theories (Landau). For relativistic particles ($\ensuremath{\gamma}>100$), the Vavilov-Shulek theories give incorrect functions for absorbers of thicknesses $t<1$ mm. The conversion of energy-loss spectra into ionization spectra is discussed, and the latter are compared with experimental functions. Good agreement is found between calculated and observed functions for electrons, mesons, protons, and their antiparticles and for $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ particles. From this agreement, the error ($1\ensuremath{\sigma}$) of the theoretical values of the most probable energy loss ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{p}$ and the full width at half maximum, $w$, is estimated to be less than \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.60.663

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The peak in the LET spectrum appears at about 0.14 keV/μm, consistent with the calculated most probable energy deposit for minimum-ionizing protons in 300 μm of silicon when the scaling factor to water is applied.

    “This peak appears at LET of about 0.14 keV/  m, consistent with the calculated most probable energy deposit for minimum-ionizing protons in 300  m of silicon (Bichsel, 1988) when our factor for scaling to water is applied.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bichsel, H.
Corresponding author
Bichsel, Hans
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
1988-07-01
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
663-699
ISSN
0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011922559
Cited by
402
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle Detector Development and Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Ion-surface interactions and analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Keywords
straggling, energy loss spectra, dielectric function, X-ray absorption coefficient, generalized oscillator strengths, Landau theory, convolution method, ionization spectra, fast charged particles, relativistic particles, alpha particles, mesons, electrons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review