Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The spin-½ Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a square lattice and its application to the cuprous oxides

Manousakis, Efstratios·1991·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

The spin-\textonehalf{} antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model on a square lattice is used to describe the dynamics of the spin degrees of freedom of undoped copper oxides. Even though the model lacks an exact solution, a solid, accurate, and rather conventional picture emerges from a number of techniques---analytical (spin-wave theory, Schwinger boson mean-field theory, renormalization-group calculations), semianalytical (variational theory, series expansions), and numerical (quantum Monte Carlo, exact diagonalization, etc.). At zero temperature, the effect of the zero-point fluctuations is not strong enough to destroy the antiferromagnetic long-range order, despite the fact that we are dealing with a low-spin low-dimensional system. The corrections to the spin-wave theory, which treats perturbatively the effect of such fluctuations around the classical N\'eel ground state, appear to be small. At any nonzero temperature the order disappears and the correlation length at low temperature $T({k}_{B}\frac{T}{J}\ensuremath{\ll}1$, where $J$ is the antiferromagnetic coupling) follows the singular form $\ensuremath{\xi}(T)=C\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{\alpha}\frac{J}{{k}_{B}}T)$. In the long-wavelength limit and at low $T$, the model has the same behavior as the quantum nonlinear $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ model in two spatial dimensions and one Euclidean time dimension, which we also study with available analytical and Monte Carlo techniques. The quasiparticles of the theory are bosons; at low $T$ and for wavelengths shorter than the correlation length they are welldefined spin-wave excitations. The spectrum of such excitations and the temperature-dependent correlation length have been determined by neutron and Raman scattering experiments done on ${\mathrm{La}}_{2}$Cu${\mathrm{O}}_{4}$. The good agreement of the experimental data with the predictions of this theory suggests that the magnetic state of the undoped materials is the conventional ordered state. We discuss, within a simple mean-field theory, the effect of weak three-dimensional antiferromagnetic coupling and the role of an antisymmetric term, introduced to explain a hidden ferromagnetic behavior of the uniform susceptibility. We find that understanding the copper-oxide antiferromagnetic insulator is only the first essential step towards the development of a theory of the superconductor created upon doping such materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.63.1

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 1,265

Metadata

Authors
Manousakis, E.
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
1991-01-01
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
1-62
ISSN
  • 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0756
OpenAlex
W2010974419
Cited by
1,265
References
8
FWCI
39.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The spin-½ Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a square lattice and its application to the cuprous oxides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.63.1
The paper
Manousakis, E. (1991). The spin-½ Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a square lattice and its application to the cuprous oxides. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.63.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.