The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the measurement of a weak classical force coupled to a harmonic oscillator: experimental progress
Abstract
Several high-precision physics experiments are approaching a level of sensitivity at which the intrinsic quantum nature of the experimental apparatus is the dominant source of fluctuations limiting the sensitivity of the measurements. This quantum limit is embodied by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which prohibits arbitrarily precise simultaneous measurements of two conjugate observables of a system but allows one-time measurements of a single observable with any precision. The dynamical evolution of a system immediately following a measurement limits the class of observables that may be measured repeatedly with arbitrary precision, with the influence of the measurement apparatus on the system being confined strictly to the conjugate observables. Observables having this feature, and the corresponding measurements performed on them have been named quantum nondemolition or back-action evasion observables. In a previous review (Caves et al., 1980, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 341) a quantum-mechanical analysis of quantum nondemolition measurements of a harmonic oscillator was presented. The present review summarizes the experimental progress on quantum nondemolition measurements and the classical models developed to describe and guide the development of practical implementations of quantum nondemolition measurements. The relationship between the classical and quantum theoretical models is also reviewed. The concept of quantum nondemolition and back-action evasion measurements originated in the context of measurements on a macroscopic mechanical harmonic oscillator, though these techniques may be useful in other experimental contexts as well, as is discussed in the last part of this review. [S0034-6861(96)00103-1]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups
Lindblad, G. (1976) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01608499 · Cited by 7,548
Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N -level systems
Gorini, V., Kossakowski, A., & Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1976) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.522979 · Cited by 3,998
Die gegenw�rtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik
Schr�dinger, E. (1935) · Die Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf01491891 · Cited by 3,392
Feynman, R. P. (1986) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01886518 · Cited by 1,770
Smithey, D. T., Beck, M., Raymer, M. G., & Faridani, A. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1244 · Cited by 1,538
Geonium theory: Physics of a single electron or ion in a Penning trap
Brown, L. S., & Gabrielse, G. (1986) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.58.233 · Cited by 1,367
Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics
Griffiths, R. B. (1984) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01015734 · Cited by 1,138
Die gegenw�rtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik
Schr�dinger, E. (1935) · Die Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf01491987 · Cited by 832
Coherent states via decoherence.
Zurek, W. H., Habib, S., & Paz, J. P. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1187 · Cited by 679
Nelson, E. (1985) · doi:10.1515/9780691218021 · Cited by 508
Cited by
Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical
Zurek, W. H. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.715 · Cited by 4,295
Tsang, M. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.063837 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Bocko, M. F., & Onofrio, R.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1996-07-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 755-799
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2119274730
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the measurement of a weak classical force coupled to a harmonic oscillator: experimental progress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.68.755
- The paper
- Bocko, M. F., & Onofrio, R. (1996). On the measurement of a weak classical force coupled to a harmonic oscillator: experimental progress. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.68.755
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.