The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diabolical conical intersections
Abstract
In the Born-Oppenheimer approximation for molecular dynamics as generalized by Born and Huang, nuclei move on multiple potential-energy surfaces corresponding to different electronic states. These surfaces may intersect at a point in the nuclear coordinates with the topology of a double cone. These conical intersections have important consequences for the dynamics. When an adiabatic electronic wave function is transported around a closed loop in nuclear coordinate space that encloses a conical intersection point, it acquires an additional geometric, or Berry, phase. The Schr\"odinger equation for nuclear motion must be modified accordingly. A conical intersection also permits efficient nonadiabatic transitions between potential-energy surfaces. Most examples of the geometric phase in molecular dynamics have been in situations in which a molecular point-group symmetry required the electronic degeneracy and the consequent conical intersection. Similarly, it has been commonly assumed that the conical intersections facilitating nonadiabatic transitions were largely symmetry driven. However, conical intersections also occur in the absence of any symmetry considerations. This review discusses computational tools for finding and characterizing the conical intersections in such systems. Because these purely accidental intersections are difficult to anticipate, they may occur more frequently than previously thought and in unexpected situations, making the geometric phase effect and the occurrence of efficient nonadiabatic transitions more commonplace phenomena. [S0034-6861(96)00404-7]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics
Özdemir, Ş. K., Rotter, S., Nori, F., & Yang, L. (2019) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0304-9 · Cited by 1,773
Isomerization Through Conical Intersections
Levine, B. G., & Martínez, T. J. (2007) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.57.032905.104612 · Cited by 873
Ab Initio Multiple Spawning: Photochemistry from First Principles Quantum Molecular Dynamics
Ben-Nun, M., Quenneville, J., & Martínez, T. J. (2000) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp994174i · Cited by 834
Role of Conical Intersections in Molecular Spectroscopy and Photoinduced Chemical Dynamics
Domcke, W., & Yarkony, D. R. (2012) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103522 · Cited by 508
Self-citationColloquium: Coherently controlled adiabatic passage
Král, P., Thanopulos, I., & Shapiro, M. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.53 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Yarkony, D. R.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1996-10-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 985-1013
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2024524738
- Cited by
- 1,041
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diabolical conical intersections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.68.985
- The paper
- Yarkony, D. R. (1996). Diabolical conical intersections. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.68.985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.