Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 975

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Experiments and theory in cold and ultracold collisions

Weiner, John, Bagnato, Vanderlei S., Zilio, Sergio, Julienne, Paul S.·1999·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

The authors review progress in understanding the nature of atomic collisions occurring at temperatures ranging from the millidegrees Kelvin to the nanodegrees Kelvin regime. The review includes advances in experiments with atom beams, light traps, and purely magnetic traps. Semiclassical and fully quantal theories are described and their appropriate applicability assessed. The review divides the subject into two principal categories: collisions in the presence of one or more light fields and ground-state collisions in the dark.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.71.1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 975

Metadata

Authors
Weiner, J., Bagnato, V. S., Zilio, S., & Julienne, P. S.
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
1999-01-01
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
1-85
ISSN
  • 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0756
OpenAlex
W1966537553
Cited by
975
References
0
FWCI
37.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experiments and theory in cold and ultracold collisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.71.1
The paper
Weiner, J., Bagnato, V. S., Zilio, S., & Julienne, P. S. (1999). Experiments and theory in cold and ultracold collisions. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.71.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.