Cited by 327Quantum and electron transport phenomenaAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsTopological Materials and Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 13 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 36 are not checked yet.

Nobel Lecture: Fractional quantization

Open access
Laughlin, R. B.·1999·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

One of my favorite times in the academic year occurs in early spring when I give my class of extremely bright graduate students, who have mastered quantum mechanics but are otherwise unsuspecting and innocent, a take-home exam in which they are asked to deduce superfluidity from first principles. There is no doubt a special place in hell being reserved for me at this very moment for this mean trick, for the task is impossible. Superfluidity, like the fractional quantum Hall effect, is an emergent phenomenon—a low-energy collective effect of huge numbers of particles that cannot be deduced from the microscopic equations of motion in a rigorous way and that disappears completely when the system is taken apart (Anderson, 1972). There are prototypes for superfluids, of course, and students who memorize them have taken the first step down the long road to understanding the phenomenon, but these are all approximate and in the end not deductive at all, but fits to experiment. The students feel betrayed and hurt by this experience because they have been trained to think in reductionist terms and thus to believe that everything not amenable to such thinking is unimportant. But nature is much more heartless than I am, and those students who stay in physics long enough to seriously confront the experimental record eventually come to understand that the reductionist idea is wrong a great deal of the time, and perhaps always. One common response in the early stages of learning is that superconductivity and the quantum Hall effect are not fundamental and therefore not worth taking seriously. When this happens I just open up the AIP Handbook and show the disbeliever that the accepted values of e and h are defined by these effects, and that ends that. The world is full of things for which one’s understanding, i.e., one’s ability to predict what will happen in an experiment, is degraded by taking the system apart, including most delightfully the standard model of elementary particles itself. I myself have come to suspect most of the important outstanding problems in physics are emergent in nature, including particularly quantum gravity. One of the things an emergent phenomenon can do is create new particles. When a large number of atoms condense into a crystal, the phonon, the elementary quantum of sound, becomes a perfectly legitimate particle at low energy scales. It propagates freely, does not decay, carries momentum and energy related to wave-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.71.863

Cites

13 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Polyakov, A. M., 1974, JETP Lett., 20, 1974
  2. Skyrme, T. H. R., 1961, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 262, 233

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Laughlin, R. B.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Laughlin, R. B.
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
1999-07-01
Volume
71
Issue
4
Pages
863-874
ISSN
  • 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0756
OpenAlex
W2133682359
Cited by
321
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
Keywords
fractional quantization, fractional quantum Hall effect, superfluidity, superconductivity, emergence, reductionism, quantum Hall effect, superfluid helium, quantum gravity, elementary particles, phonons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review