The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
M(atrix) theory: matrix quantum mechanics as a fundamental theory
Open accessAbstract
This article reviews the matrix model of M theory. M theory is an 11-dimensional quantum theory of gravity that is believed to underlie all superstring theories. M theory is currently the most plausible candidate for a theory of fundamental physics which reconciles gravity and quantum field theory in a realistic fashion. Evidence for M theory is still only circumstantial---no complete background-independent formulation of the theory exists as yet. Matrix theory was first developed as a regularized theory of a supersymmetric quantum membrane. More recently, it has appeared in a different guise as the discrete light-cone quantization of M theory in flat space. These two approaches to matrix theory are described in detail and compared. It is shown that matrix theory is a well-defined quantum theory that reduces to a supersymmetric theory of gravity at low energies. Although its fundamental degrees of freedom are essentially pointlike, higher-dimensional fluctuating objects (branes) arise through the non-Abelian structure of the matrix degrees of freedom. The problem of formulating matrix theory in a general space-time background is discussed, and the connections between matrix theory and other related models are reviewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The large $N$ limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity
Maldacena, J. (1998) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a1 · Cited by 14,524
Anti de Sitter space and holography
Witten, E. (1998) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a2 · Cited by 13,070
Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory
Gubser, S. S., Klebanov, I. R., & Polyakov, A. M. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00377-3 · Cited by 9,307
Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory
Gubser, S. S., Klebanov, I. R., & Polyakov, A. M. (1998) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9802109 · Cited by 9,307
An Alternative to Compactification
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.4690 · Cited by 7,217
Large N field theories, string theory and gravity
Aharony, O., Gubser, S. S., Maldacena, J., Ooguri, H., & Oz, Y. (2000) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(99)00083-6 · Cited by 5,515
String theory and noncommutative geometry
Seiberg, N., & Witten, E. (1999) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/09/032 · Cited by 3,712
Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory
Moyal, J. E. (1949) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100000487 · Cited by 3,116
M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture
Banks, T., Fischler, W., Shenker, S. H., & Susskind, L. (1997) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.5112 · Cited by 2,748
Supersymmetry and Supergravity: Revised Edition
Wess, J., & Bagger, J. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvzxx9rz · Cited by 2,685
Cited by
Douglas, M., & Nekrasov, N. (2001) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.977 · Cited by 2,096
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, W.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2001-06-08
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 419-461
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W1967067976
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 117
- FWCI
- 18.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: M(atrix) theory: matrix quantum mechanics as a fundamental theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.73.419
- The paper
- Taylor, W. (2001). M(atrix) theory: matrix quantum mechanics as a fundamental theory. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.73.419
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.