Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 489

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The superconducting phases ofUPt3

Joynt, Robert, Taillefer, Louis·2002·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

The heavy-fermion compound ${\mathrm{UPt}}_{3}$ is the first compelling example of a superconductor with an order parameter of unconventional symmetry. To this day, it is the only unambiguous case of multiple superconducting phases. Twenty years of experiment and theory on the superconductivity of ${\mathrm{UPt}}_{3}$ are reviewed, with the aim of accounting for the multicomponent phase diagram and identifying the superconducting phases. First, the state above the superconducting critical temperature at ${T}_{c}=0.5\mathrm{K}$ is briefly described: de Haas--van Alphen and other measurements demonstrate that this state is a Fermi liquid, with degeneracy fully achieved at ${T}_{c}.$ This implies that the usual BCS theory of superconductivity should hold, although the strong magnetic interactions suggest the possibility of an unconventional superconducting order parameter. The role of the weak antiferromagnetic order below ${T}_{N}=5\mathrm{K}$ in causing phase multiplicity is examined. A comprehensive analysis of which superconducting states are possible is given, and the theoretical basis for each of the main candidates is considered. The behavior of various properties at low temperature $(T\ensuremath{\ll}{T}_{c})$ is reviewed. The experiments clearly indicate the presence of nodes in the superconducting gap function of all three phases. In particular, the low-temperature low-field phase has a gap with a line node in the basal plane and point nodes along the hexagonal $c$ axis. The phase diagram in the magnetic-field--temperature plane has been determined in detail by ultrasound and thermodynamic measurements. Experiments under pressure indicate a coupling between antiferromagnetism and superconductivity and provide additional clues about the order parameter. Theoretically, Ginzburg-Landau theory is the tool that elucidates the phase diagram, while calculations of the temperature and field dependence of physical quantities have been used to compare different order parameters to experiment. On balance, the data point to a two-component order parameter belonging to either the ${E}_{1g}$ or the ${E}_{2u}$ representation, with degeneracy lifted by a coupling to the symmetry-breaking magnetic order. However, no single theoretical scenario is completely consistent with all the data. The coupling of superconductivity and magnetism may be the weakest link in the current picture of ${\mathrm{UPt}}_{3},$ and full understanding depends on the resolution of this issue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.74.235

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 489

Metadata

Authors
Joynt, R., & Taillefer, L.
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
2002-03-11
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
235-294
ISSN
  • 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0756
OpenAlex
W2003575418
Cited by
489
References
54
FWCI
14.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The superconducting phases ofUPt3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.74.235
The paper
Joynt, R., & Taillefer, L. (2002). The superconducting phases ofUPt3. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.74.235

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.