The DOI matches its Crossref record; 326 of the 326 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches
Open accessAbstract
Electronic excitations lie at the origin of most of the commonly measured spectra. However, the first-principles computation of excited states requires a larger effort than ground-state calculations, which can be very efficiently carried out within density-functional theory. On the other hand, two theoretical and computational tools have come to prominence for the description of electronic excitations. One of them, many-body perturbation theory, is based on a set of Green's-function equations, starting with a one-electron propagator and considering the electron-hole Green's function for the response. Key ingredients are the electron's self-energy \ensuremath{\Sigma} and the electron-hole interaction. A good approximation for \ensuremath{\Sigma} is obtained with Hedin's $\mathrm{GW}$ approach, using density-functional theory as a zero-order solution. First-principles $\mathrm{GW}$ calculations for real systems have been successfully carried out since the 1980s. Similarly, the electron-hole interaction is well described by the Bethe-Salpeter equation, via a functional derivative of \ensuremath{\Sigma}. An alternative approach to calculating electronic excitations is the time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT), which offers the important practical advantage of a dependence on density rather than on multivariable Green's functions. This approach leads to a screening equation similar to the Bethe-Salpeter one, but with a two-point, rather than a four-point, interaction kernel. At present, the simple adiabatic local-density approximation has given promising results for finite systems, but has significant deficiencies in the description of absorption spectra in solids, leading to wrong excitation energies, the absence of bound excitonic states, and appreciable distortions of the spectral line shapes. The search for improved TDDFT potentials and kernels is hence a subject of increasing interest. It can be addressed within the framework of many-body perturbation theory: in fact, both the Green's functions and the TDDFT approaches profit from mutual insight. This review compares the theoretical and practical aspects of the two approaches and their specific numerical implementations, and presents an overview of accomplishments and work in progress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Leveraging the SSSP protocol, we identify two optimal PSP libraries, named SSSP efficiency and SSSP precision (version 1.1), that provide thoroughly tested and precise PSPs for 85 elements of the periodic table, selected from publicly available PSP libraries [16-22], for which the original authors should be acknowledged.”
From Precision and efficiency in solid-state pseudopotential calculations (2018) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Leveraging the SSSP protocol, we identify two optimal PSP libraries, named SSSP efficiency and SSSP precision (version 1.1), that provide thoroughly tested and precise PSPs for 85 elements of the periodic table, selected from publicly available PSP libraries [16-22], for which the original authors should be acknowledged.”
From Precision and efficiency in solid-state pseudopotential calculations (2018) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Hohenberg, P., & Kohn, W. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b864 · Cited by 53,541
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Ground State of the Electron Gas by a Stochastic Method
Ceperley, D. M., & Alder, B. J. (1980) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.45.566 · Cited by 14,561
Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory
Baroni, S., de Gironcoli, S., Corso, A. D., & Giannozzi, P. (2001) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.515 · Cited by 10,171
Density-Functional Theory for Time-Dependent Systems
Runge, E., & Gross, E. K. U. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.997 · Cited by 8,914 · cited 2×
“On the other hand, DFT has been extended to time-dependent DFT (Runge and Gross, 1984), which is in principle an exact theory for the description of neutral excitations (such as those involved in absorption).”
BackgroundGeorges, A., Kotliar, G., Krauth, W., & Rozenberg, M. J. (1996) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.68.13 · Cited by 6,901
Bauernschmitt, R., & Ahlrichs, R. (1996) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/0009-2614(96)00440-x · Cited by 5,747
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Anisimov, V. I., 1997, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 9, 767
- Aulbur, W. G., 1999, Solid State Phys., 54, 1
- Castro, A., 2001, J. Chem. Phys., 118, 1930
- Dobson, J. F., 1988, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2, 6461
- Galitskii, V. M., 1958, Sov. Phys. JETP, 7, 96
- Hedin, L., 1999, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 11, R489
- Keldysh, L. V., 1965, Sov. Phys. JETP, 20, 1018
- Landau, L. D., 1957, Sov. Phys. JETP, 3, 920
- Landau, L. D., 1957, Sov. Phys. JETP, 5, 101
- Landau, L. D., 1959, Sov. Phys. JETP, 35, 70
- Lindhard, J., 1954, K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Medd., 28, 57
- Lundqvist, B. I., 1967, Phys. Kondens. Mater., 6, 193
- Lundqvist, B. I., 1968, Phys. Kondens. Mater., 7, 117
- Mahan, G. D., 1994, Comments Condens. Matter Phys., 16, 333
- Pollehn, T. J., 1998, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 10, 1273
- Taut, M., 1992, J. Phys. C, 4, 9595
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,001
Diabatic states of a photoexcited retinal chromophore fromab initiomany-body perturbation theory
Kaczmarski, M. S., Ma, Y., & Rohlfing, M. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.115433 · Cited by 53
Many body effects study of electronic & optical properties of silicene–graphene hybrid
Drissi, L. B., & Ramadan, F. Z. (2014) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/j.physe.2014.12.009 · Cited by 53
Olsen, T., & Thygesen, K. S. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.115131 · Cited by 53
First-principle calculations of the linear and nonlinear optical response for GaX (X = As, Sb, P)
Reshak, A. H. (2005) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2005-00364-3 · Cited by 53
Marini, A. (2013) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/427/1/012003 · Cited by 54
Katan, C., Charlot, M., Mongin, O., Droumaguet, C. L., Jouikov, V., Terenziani, F., Badaeva, E. A., Tretiak, S., & Blanchard-Desce, M. H. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp911445m · Cited by 53
Fermi velocity renormalization in doped graphene
Attaccalite, C., & Rubio, Á. (2009) · physica status solidi (b) · doi:10.1002/pssb.200982335 · Cited by 52
First-principles study of electronic, thermoelectric and thermal properties of Sb2S3
Nasr, T. B., Maghraoui-Meherzi, H., & Kamoun‐Turki, N. (2015) · Journal of Alloys and Compounds · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.12.093 · Cited by 53
Quasiparticle Energies and Optical Excitations in Chevron-Type Graphene Nanoribbon
Wang, S., & Wang, J. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp2125872 · Cited by 53
Electronic and Optical Structure of Wurtzite CuInS2
Tomić, S., Bernasconi, L., Searle, B. G., & Harrison, N. M. (2014) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp411213d · Cited by 53
Amino Acid Anions in Organic Ionic Compounds. An ab Initio Study of Selected Ion Pairs
Benedetto, A., Bodo, E., Gontrani, L., Ballone, P., & Caminiti, R. (2014) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp412281n · Cited by 53
Quasiparticle and optical properties of strained stanene and stanane
Lu, P., Wu, L., Yang, C., Liang, D., Quhe, R., Guan, P., & Wang, S. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04210-w · Cited by 53
Numerical methods for Kohn–Sham density functional theory
Lin, L., Lu, J., & Ying, L. (2019) · Acta Numerica · doi:10.1017/s0962492919000047 · Cited by 62
Byun, Y., Sun, J., & Ullrich, C. A. (2020) · Electronic Structure · doi:10.1088/2516-1075/ab7b12 · Cited by 56
Time‐Dependent Density Functional Theory Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Liquid Water Radiolysis
Tavernelli, I., Gaigeot, M., Vuilleumier, R., Stia, C. R., du Penhoat, M. H., & Politis, M. (2008) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.200800177 · Cited by 53
Transforming Nonlocality into a Frequency Dependence: A Shortcut to Spectroscopy
Gatti, M., Olevano, V., Reining, L., & Tokatly, I. V. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.057401 · Cited by 53
Self-citationFirst-principles approach to the electron-phonon interaction
van Leeuwen, R. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.115110 · Cited by 53
Müller, M. C. T. D., Blügel, S., & Friedrich, C. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.045130 · Cited by 52
Recent advances in the ab initio theory of solid‐state defect qubits
Gali, Á. (2023) · Nanophotonics · doi:10.1515/nanoph-2022-0723 · Cited by 52
Galperin, M., & Tretiak, S. (2008) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2876011 · Cited by 52
Nakamura, K., Nohara, Y., Yosimoto, Y., & Nomura, Y. (2016) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.085124 · Cited by 52
Time-dependent density-functional approach for exciton binding energies
Turkowski, V., Leonardo, A., & Ullrich, C. A. (2009) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.233201 · Cited by 52
Time-dependent versus static quantum transport simulations beyond linear response
Yam, C., Zheng, X. H., Chen, G., Wang, Y., Frauenheim, T., & Niehaus, T. A. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.245448 · Cited by 52
Communication: Strong excitonic and vibronic effects determine the optical properties of Li2O2
García-Lastra, J. M., Bass, J. D., & Thygesen, K. S. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3645544 · Cited by 52
Quantum Monte Carlo study of high pressure solid molecular hydrogen
Azadi, S., Foulkes, W. M. C., & Kühne, T. D. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/11/113005 · Cited by 52
Rousseau, B., Eiguren, A., & Bergara, A. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.054305 · Cited by 51
Excited state calculations in solids by auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo
Ma, F., Zhang, S., & Krakauer, H. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/9/093017 · Cited by 52
Large-scale GW -BSE calculations with N3 scaling: Excitonic effects in dye-sensitized solar cells
Marsili, M., Mosconi, E., Angelis, F. D., & Umari, P. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.075415 · Cited by 52
Time-dependent density functional theory applied to x-ray absorption spectroscopy
Bunău, O., & Joly, Y. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.155121 · Cited by 52
Li-Filled, B-Substituted Carbon Clathrates
Zeng, T., Hoffmann, R., Nesper, R., Ashcroft, N. W., Strobel, T. A., & Proserpio, D. M. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b07883 · Cited by 52
Excitons in van der Waals materials: From monolayer to bulk hexagonal boron nitride
Koskelo, J., Fugallo, G., Hakala, M. O., Gatti, M., Sottile, F., & Cudazzo, P. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.035125 · Cited by 54
Electronic and excitonic properties of two-dimensional and bulk InN crystals
Liang, D., Quhe, R., Chen, Y., Wu, L., Wang, Q., Guan, P., Wang, S., & Lu, P. (2017) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c7ra07640a · Cited by 52
Olsen, T., Patrick, C. E., Bates, J. E., Ruzsinszky, A., & Thygesen, K. S. (2019) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-019-0242-8 · Cited by 52
Umari, P., Petrenko, O., Taioli, S., & Souza, M. M. D. (2012) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4716178 · Cited by 52
Caruso, F., Atalla, V., Ren, X., Rubio, Á., Scheffler, M., & Rinke, P. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.085141 · Cited by 51
Fully self-consistent finite-temperature G W in Gaussian Bloch orbitals for solids
Yeh, C.-N., Iskakov, S., Zgid, D., & Gull, E. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.235104 · Cited by 51
Excitonic Polarons and Self-Trapped Excitons from First-Principles Exciton-Phonon Couplings
Dai, Z., Lian, C., Lafuente-Bartolome, J., & Giustino, F. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.036902 · Cited by 58
Optical spectra from molecules to crystals: Insight from many-body perturbation theory
Cocchi, C., & Draxl, C. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.205126 · Cited by 50
EELS study of the epitaxial graphene/Ni(1 1 1) and graphene/Au/Ni(1 1 1) systems
Generalov, A. V., & Dedkov, Y. S. (2011) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.08.018 · Cited by 51
Redshift of Excitons in Carbon Nanotubes Caused by the Environment Polarizability
Rohlfing, M. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.087402 · Cited by 51
Validation of density-functional versus density-functional+U approaches for oxide ultrathin films
Barcaro, G., Thomas, I. O., & Fortunelli, A. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3366689 · Cited by 51
Trimarchi, G., Peng, H., Im, J., Freeman, A. J., Cloet, V., Raw, A. D., Poeppelmeier, K. R., Biswas, K., Lany, S., & Zunger, A. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.165116 · Cited by 51
Emfietzoglou, D., Kyriakou, I., Abril, I., Garcia‐Molina, R., Petsalakis, I. D., Nikjoo, H., & Pathak, A. P. (2008) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms · doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2008.11.008 · Cited by 51
Variational energy functionals tested on atoms
Dahlen, N. E., & von Barth, U. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.195102 · Cited by 51
First‐principles approaches for strongly correlated materials: A theoretical chemistry perspective
Jiang, H. Y. (2015) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24905 · Cited by 51
Su, N. Q., Yang, W., Mori‐Sánchez, P., & Xu, X. (2014) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp5029992 · Cited by 51
Miranda, H. P. C., Reichardt, S., Froehlicher, G., Molina‐Sánchez, A., Berciaud, S., & Wirtz, L. (2017) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05345 · Cited by 51
Correlated electron-hole mechanism for molecular doping in organic semiconductors
Li, J., D’Avino, G., Pershin, A., Jacquemin, D., Duchemin, I., Beljonne, D., & Blase, X. (2017) · Physical Review Materials · doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.1.025602 · Cited by 51
Study of Li Adsorption on Graphdiyne Using Hybrid DFT Calculations
Kim, J., Kang, S., Lim, J., & Kim, W. Y. (2018) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.8b03482 · Cited by 51
Unphysical Discontinuities in GW Methods
Véril, M., Romaniello, P., Berger, J. A., & Loos, P. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00745 · Cited by 55
Electronic excitations in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers from an LDA+GdW approach
Drüppel, M., Deilmann, T., Noky, J., Marauhn, P., Krüger, P., & Rohlfing, M. (2018) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.155433 · Cited by 51
Yuan, Z., & Gao, S. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.155411 · Cited by 51
Varsano, D., Marini, A., & Rubio, Á. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.133002 · Cited by 51
Sainudeen, Z., & Ray, P. C. (2005) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp052820+ · Cited by 51
Low-Lying Exciton States Determine the Photophysics of Semiconducting Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes
Scholes, G. D., Tretiak, S., McDonald, T. J., Metzger, W. K., Engtrakul, C., Rumbles, G., & Heben, M. J. (2007) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp068541j · Cited by 51
Duchemin, I., & Blase, X. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.245412 · Cited by 51
Dien, V. K., Li, W.-B., Lin, K., Han, N. T., & Lin, M. (2022) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d2ra06722f · Cited by 50
Transition between direct and indirect band gap in silicon nanocrystals
Kocevski, V., Eriksson, O., & Rusz, J. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.245401 · Cited by 50
Reduced quantum confinement effect and electron-hole separation in SiGe nanowires
Amato, M., Palummo, M., & Ossicini, S. (2009) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.201302 · Cited by 51
Pacchioni, G. (2014) · Catalysis Letters · doi:10.1007/s10562-014-1386-2 · Cited by 53
Role of localized electrons in electron-hole interaction: The case of SrTiO 3
Sponza, L., Vëniard, V., Sottile, F., Giorgetti, C., & Reining, L. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.235102 · Cited by 53
Self-citationFine structure of light-hole excitons in nanowire quantum dots
Zieliński, M. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.115424 · Cited by 56
Gumhalter, B., Kovač, V., Caruso, F., Lambert, H., & Giustino, F. (2016) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.035103 · Cited by 50
Patra, S. K., Sheet, S. K., Sen, B., Aguan, K., Roy, D. R., & Khatua, S. (2017) · The Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.joc.7b01743 · Cited by 50
Giorgi, G., Yamashita, K., & Palummo, M. (2018) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c8tc03496f · Cited by 50
Finite-Field Approach to Solving the Bethe-Salpeter Equation
Nguyen, N. L., Ma, H., Govoni, M., Gygi, F., & Galli, G. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.237402 · Cited by 50
Ketolainen, T., Macháčová, N., & Karlický, F. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00387 · Cited by 50
Zhao, J. H., Zeng, H. J., & Yao, G. (2021) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d0cp05909a · Cited by 50
Dielectric anisotropy in the GW space–time method
Freysoldt, C., Eggert, P., Rinke, P., Schindlmayr, A., Godby, R. W., & Scheffler, M. (2006) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2006.07.018 · Cited by 50
Jacquemin, D., Bouhy, M., & Perpète, É. A. (2006) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2202735 · Cited by 50
Windgätter, L., Rösner, M., Mazza, G., Hübener, H., Georges, A., Millis, A. J., Latini, S., & Rubio, Á. (2021) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-021-00675-6 · Cited by 49
Gould, T., Hashimi, Z., Kronik, L., & Dale, S. G. (2022) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00042 · Cited by 49
Connections and performances of Green’s function methods for charged and neutral excitations
Monino, E., & Loos, P. (2023) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0159853 · Cited by 51
Nguyen, N. L., Borghi, G., Ferretti, A., Dabo, I., & Marzari, N. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.166405 · Cited by 49
Gori, P., Cobet, M., Cobet, C., Richter, W., Esser, N., Hoffmann, A., Sole, R. D., Cricenti, A., & Pulci, O. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.125207 · Cited by 49
Stretching of BDT-gold molecular junctions: thiol or thiolate termination?
Souza, A. D. M., Rungger, I., Pontes, R. B., Rocha, A. R., da Silva, A. J. R., Schwingenschlöegl, U., & Sanvito, S. (2014) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c4nr04081c · Cited by 49
Troyano, J., Perles, J., Amo‐Ochoa, P., Martínez, J. I., Gimeno, M. C., Fernández‐Moreira, V., Zamora, F., & Delgado, S. (2016) · Chemistry - A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.201603675 · Cited by 49
Oprea, C. I., & Gîrțu, M. A. (2019) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano9030357 · Cited by 49
Stochastic Vertex Corrections: Linear Scaling Methods for Accurate Quasiparticle Energies
Vlček, V. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00317 · Cited by 48
Xie, R.-H., Bryant, G. W., Sun, G., Nicklaus, M. C., Heringer, D., Frauenheim, T., Manaa, M. R., Smith, V. H., Araki, Y., & Ito, O. (2004) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1647532 · Cited by 49
Dynamical response function in sodium and aluminum from time-dependent density-functional theory
Cazzaniga, M., Weissker, H., Huotari, S., Pylkkänen, T., Salvestrini, P., Monaco, G., Onida, G., & Reining, L. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.075109 · Cited by 49
Self-citationTrapping of excitons at chemical defects in polyethylene
Ceresoli, D., Tosatti, E., Scandolo, S., Santoro, G. E., & Serra, S. (2004) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1783876 · Cited by 49
Properties of titanium dioxide
Parrino, F., Pomilla, F. R., Camera‐Roda, G., Loddo, V., & Palmisano, L. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819960-2.00001-8 · Cited by 49
Marsili, M., Molina‐Sánchez, A., Palummo, M., Sangalli, D., & Marini, A. (2021) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.155152 · Cited by 53
2024 roadmap on membrane desalination technology at the water-energy nexus
Politano, A., Al-Juboori, R. A., Alnajdi, S., Alsaati, A. A., Athanassiou, A., Bar‐Sadan, M., Beni, A. N., Campi, D., Cupolillo, A., D’Olimpio, G., et al. (2024) · Journal of Physics Energy · doi:10.1088/2515-7655/ad2cf2 · Cited by 48
Shu, H., Wang, F., Ren, K., & Guo, J. (2024) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/d4nr04545a · Cited by 48
Auger recombination in Si and GaAs semiconductors:Ab initioresults
Govoni, M., Marri, I., & Ossicini, S. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.075215 · Cited by 48
Comparison of theoretical approaches for predicting the UV/Vis spectra of anthraquinones
Jacquemin, D., Assfeld, X., Preat, J., & Perpète, É. A. (2007) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268970601140974 · Cited by 48
Electronic properties of molecular solids: the peculiar case of solid picene
Roth, F., Gatti, M., Cudazzo, P., Grobosch, M., Mahns, B., Büchner, B., Rubio, Á., & Knupfer, M. (2010) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/10/103036 · Cited by 48
Ab initiomethods for the optical properties of CdSe clusters
del Puerto, M. L., Tiago, M. L., & Chelikowsky, J. R. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.045404 · Cited by 49
Impact of widely used approximations to theG0W0method: an all-electron perspective
Li, X.-Z., Gómez-Abal, R. I., Jiang, H. Y., Draxl, C., & Scheffler, M. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/2/023006 · Cited by 48
Structural and Optoelectronic Properties of Unsaturated ZnO and ZnS Nanoclusters
Malloci, G., Chiodo, L., Rubio, Á., & Mattoni, A. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp209756z · Cited by 48
Electronic and transport properties of LiCoO 2
Andriyevsky, B. V., Doll, K., & Jacob, T. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c4cp03052d · Cited by 48
Interface-Induced Renormalization of Electrolyte Energy Levels in Magnesium Batteries
Kumar, N., & Siegel, D. J. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00091 · Cited by 51
Sangalli, D., Conte, S. D., Manzoni, C., Cerullo, G., & Marini, A. (2016) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.195205 · Cited by 47
Charge-Transfer Excited States in Aqueous DNA: Insights from Many-Body Green’s Function Theory
Yin, H., Ma, Y., Mu, J., Liu, C., & Rohlfing, M. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.228301 · Cited by 48
Wang, H., Wu, F., & Jiang, H. Y. (2011) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp2047294 · Cited by 48
Andharia, E., Kaloni, T. P., Salamo, G. J., Yu, S.-Q., Churchill, H., & Barraza‐Lopez, S. (2018) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.035420 · Cited by 48
Energy transfer from intense laser pulse to dielectrics in time-dependent density functional theory
Yamada, A., & Yabana, K. (2019) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2019-90334-7 · Cited by 46
Opto-Mechanics Driven Fast Martensitic Transition in Two-Dimensional Materials
Zhou, J., Xu, H., Li, Y., Jaramillo, R., & Li, J. (2018) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03559 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Onida, G., Reining, L., & Rubio, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2002-06-07
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 601-659
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2053499780
- Cited by
- 4,155
- References
- 323
- Citations by year
- 2026: 238 · 2025: 221 · 2024: 233 · 2023: 232 · 2022: 202 · 2021: 245 · 2020: 270 · 2019: 199 · 2018: 223 · 2017: 210 · 2016: 224 · 2015: 203 · 2014: 217 · 2013: 168 · 2012: 180
- FWCI
- 48.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
- Keywords
- electronic excitation, excited states, GW approximation, Bethe-Salpeter equation, time-dependent density functional theory, many-body perturbation theory, Green's function, electron self-energy, electron-hole interaction, adiabatic local density approximation, absorption spectra, spectral line shape, excitonic states
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review