The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure
Abstract
The authors review the present status of self-consistent mean-field (SCMF) models for describing nuclear structure and low-energy dynamics. These models are presented as effective energy-density functionals. The three most widely used variants of SCMF's based on a Skyrme energy functional, a Gogny force, and a relativistic mean-field Lagrangian are considered side by side. The crucial role of the treatment of pairing correlations is pointed out in each case. The authors discuss other related nuclear structure models and present several extensions beyond the mean-field model which are currently used. Phenomenological adjustment of the model parameters is discussed in detail. The performance quality of the SCMF model is demonstrated for a broad range of typical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Density-Functional Theory for Time-Dependent Systems
Runge, E., & Gross, E. K. U. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.997 · Cited by 8,914
Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches
Onida, G., Reining, L., & Rubio, A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.601 · Cited by 4,155
Skyrme, T. H. R. (1956) · Philosophical Magazine · doi:10.1080/14786435608238186 · Cited by 715
Cited by
Recent progress and new challenges in isospin physics with heavy-ion reactions
LI, B., CHEN, L., & KO, C. (2008) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.04.005 · Cited by 1,314
High-accuracy mass spectrometry with stored ions
Blaum, K. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.011 · Cited by 685
Status and future of nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double-beta decay: a review
Engel, J., & Menéndez, J. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa5bc5 · Cited by 533
Unexpectedly large charge radii of neutron-rich calcium isotopes
Garcia Ruiz, R. F., Bissell, M. L., Blaum, K., Ekström, A., Frömmgen, N., Hagen, G., Hammen, M., Hebeler, K., Holt, J. D., Jansen, G. R., et al. (2016) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3645 · Cited by 367
Low-depth circuit ansatz for preparing correlated fermionic states on a quantum computer
Dallaire-Demers, P.-L., Romero, J., Veis, L., Sim, S., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2019) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab3951 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Bender, M., Heenen, P.-H., & Reinhard, P.-G.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2003-01-23
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 121-180
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2017445558
- Cited by
- 2,501
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 27.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.75.121
- The paper
- Bender, M., Heenen, P.-H., & Reinhard, P.-G. (2003). Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.75.121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
