The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theories of scanning probe microscopes at the atomic scale
Open accessAbstract
Significant progress has been made both in experimentation and in theoretical modeling of scanning probe microscopy. The theoretical models used to analyze and interpret experimental scanning probe microscope (SPM) images and spectroscopic data now provide information not only about the surface, but also the probe tip and physical changes occurring during the scanning process. The aim of this review is to discuss and compare the present status of computational modeling of two of the most popular SPM methods---scanning tunneling microscopy and scanning force microscopy---in conjunction with their applications to studies of surface structure and properties with atomic resolution. In the context of these atomic-scale applications, for the scanning force microscope (SFM), this review focuses primarily on recent noncontact SFM (NC-SFM) results. After a brief introduction to the experimental techniques and the main factors determining image formation, the authors consider the theoretical models developed for the scanning tunneling microscope (STM) and the SFM. Both techniques are treated from the same general perspective of a sharp tip interacting with the surface---the only difference being that the control parameter in the STM is the tunneling current and in the SFM it is the force. The existing methods for calculating STM and SFM images are described and illustrated using numerous examples, primarily from the authors' own simulations, but also from the literature. Theoretical and practical aspects of the techniques applied in STM and SFM modeling are compared. Finally, the authors discuss modeling as it relates to SPM applications in studying surface properties, such as adsorption, point defects, spin manipulation, and phonon excitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
Cited by
Direct visualization of defect-mediated dissociation of water on TiO2(110)
Bikondoa, O., Pang, C. L., Ithnin, R., Muryn, C. A., Onishi, H., & Thornton, G. (2006) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1592 · Cited by 620
Probing Liquid/Solid Interfaces at the Molecular Level
Zaera, F. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2002068 · Cited by 458
Long range interactions in nanoscale science
French, R. H., Parsegian, V. A., Podgornik, R., Rajter, R. F., Jagota, A., Luo, J., Asthagiri, D., Chaudhury, M. K., Chiang, Y.-M., Granick, S., et al. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1887 · Cited by 441
Toward Computational Materials Design: The Impact of Density Functional Theory on Materials Research
Hafner, J., Wolverton, C., & Ceder, G. (2006) · MRS Bulletin · doi:10.1557/mrs2006.174 · Cited by 369
Charge transport through molecular switches
Jan van der Molen, S., & Liljeroth, P. (2010) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/13/133001 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Hofer, W. A., Foster, A. S., & Shluger, A. L.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2003-10-20
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1287-1331
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2038812006
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theories of scanning probe microscopes at the atomic scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.75.1287
- The paper
- Hofer, W. A., Foster, A. S., & Shluger, A. L. (2003). Theories of scanning probe microscopes at the atomic scale. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.75.1287
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.