The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The shell model as a unified view of nuclear structure
Open accessAbstract
The last decade has witnessed both quantitative and qualitative progress in shell-model studies, which have resulted in remarkable gains in our understanding of the structure of the nucleus. Indeed, it is now possible to diagonalize matrices in determinantal spaces of dimensionality up to ${10}^{9}$ using the Lanczos tridiagonal construction, whose formal and numerical aspects are analyzed in this review. In addition, many new approximation methods have been developed in order to overcome the dimensionality limitations. New effective nucleon-nucleon interactions have been constructed that contain both two- and three-body contributions. The former are derived from realistic potentials (i.e., potentials consistent with two-nucleon data). The latter incorporate the pure monopole terms necessary to correct the bad saturation and shell-formation properties of the realistic two-body forces. This combination appears to solve a number of hitherto puzzling problems. The present review concentrates on those results which illustrate the global features of the approach: the universality of the effective interaction and the capacity of the shell model to describe simultaneously all the manifestations of the nuclear dynamics, either single-particle or collective in nature. The review also treats in some detail the problems associated with rotational motion, the origin of quenching of the Gamow-Teller transitions, double-$\ensuremath{\beta}$ decays, the effect of isospin nonconserving nuclear forces, and the specificities of neutron-rich nuclei. Many other calculations---which appear to have ``merely'' spectroscopic interest---are touched upon briefly, although the authors are fully aware that much of the credibility of the shell model rests on them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Variational Quantum Eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices
Tilly, J., Chen, H., Cao, S., Picozzi, D., Setia, K., Li, Y., Grant, E., Wossnig, L., Rungger, I., Booth, G. H., et al. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003 · Cited by 1,031
Status and future of nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double-beta decay: a review
Engel, J., & Menéndez, J. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa5bc5 · Cited by 533
Three-Body Forces and the Limit of Oxygen Isotopes
Otsuka, T., Suzuki, T., Holt, J. D., Schwenk, A., & Akaishi, Y. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.032501 · Cited by 490
Cloud Quantum Computing of an Atomic Nucleus
Dumitrescu, E. F., McCaskey, A. J., Hagen, G., Jansen, G. R., Morris, T. D., Papenbrock, T., Pooser, R. C., Dean, D. J., & Lougovski, P. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.210501 · Cited by 393
Recent developments in no-core shell-model calculations
Navrátil, P., Quaglioni, S., Stetcu, I., & Barrett, B. R. (2009) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/36/8/083101 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Caurier, E., Martínez-Pinedo, G., Nowacki, F., Poves, A., & Zuker, A. P.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-06-16
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 427-488
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2059823880
- Cited by
- 1,300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The shell model as a unified view of nuclear structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.77.427
- The paper
- Caurier, E., Martínez-Pinedo, G., Nowacki, F., Poves, A., & Zuker, A. P. (2005). The shell model as a unified view of nuclear structure. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.77.427
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.