The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Colloquium : Quantum annealing and analog quantum computation
Open accessAbstract
The recent success in quantum annealing, i.e., optimization of the cost or energy functions of complex systems utilizing quantum fluctuations is reviewed here. The concept is introduced in successive steps through studying the mapping of such computationally hard problems to classical spin-glass problems, quantum spin-glass problems arising with the introduction of quantum fluctuations, and the annealing behavior of the systems as these fluctuations are reduced slowly to zero. This provides a general framework for realizing analog quantum computation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Mean field [85], DFT [86, 87], or DMFT [88], finally, have other limitations, e.g., they are essentially designed for weakly-correlated systems.”
From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [88]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimization by Simulated Annealing
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · Cited by 45,134
(1979) · Cited by 43,841
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.
Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1984.4767596 · Cited by 17,949
Spin glasses: Experimental facts, theoretical concepts, and open questions
Binder, K., & Young, A. P. (1986) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.58.801 · Cited by 5,191
Topology of cosmic domains and strings
Kibble, T. W. B. (1976) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029 · Cited by 4,626
Quantum Mechanics Helps in Searching for a Needle in a Haystack
Grover, L. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.325 · Cited by 4,306
Edwards, S. F., & Anderson, P. W. (1975) · Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics · doi:10.1088/0305-4608/5/5/017 · Cited by 3,991
Spin Glass Theory and Beyond: An Introduction to the Replica Method and Its Applications
Mezard, M., Parisi, G., & Virasoro, M. (1986) · World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1142/0271 · Cited by 3,653
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 2005, Quantum Annealing and Related Optimization Methods
- Fu, Y., 1986, J. Phys. A, 19, 1620
- Hartmann, A., 2002, Optimization in Physics
- Hatano, N., 2005, Quantum Annealing and Related Optimization Methods
- Inoue, J.-I., 2005, Quantum Annealing and Related Optimization Methods
- Mezard, M., 1987, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond
- Rieger, H., 2005, Quantum Annealing and Related Optimization Methods
- Suzuki, S., 2005, Quantum Annealing and Related Optimization Methods
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 698
Noise dynamics of quantum annealers: estimating the effective noise using idle qubits
Pelofske, E., Hahn, G., & Djidjev, H. N. (2023) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/accbe6 · Cited by 12
D'Arcangelo, M., Henry, L.-P., Henriet, L., Loco, D., Gouraud, N., Angebault, S., Sueiro, J., Forêt, J., Monmarché, P., & Piquemal, J. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043020 · Cited by 20
Quantum Adiabatic Optimization with Rydberg Arrays: Localization Phenomena and Encoding Strategies
Bombieri, L., Zeng, Z., Tricarico, R., Lin, R., Notarnicola, S., Cain, M., Lukin, M. D., & Pichler, H. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.6.020306 · Cited by 20
Opportunities and challenges of quantum computing for climate modeling
Schwabe, M., Pastori, L., de Vega, I., Gentine, P., Iapichino, L., Lahtinen, V., Leib, M., Lorenz, J. M., & Eyring, V. (2025) · Environmental Data Science · doi:10.1017/eds.2025.10010 · Cited by 21
Quantum annealing and the Schrödinger-Langevin-Kostin equation
de Falco, D., & Tamascelli, D. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.012315 · Cited by 14
Quantized interlevel character in quantum systems
Xu, C., Wu, J., & Wu, C. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.032124 · Cited by 12
High-fidelity non-adiabatic cutting and stitching of a spin chain via local control
Pyshkin, P. V., Sherman, E. Y., You, J. Q., & Wu, L.-A. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aae4ac · Cited by 12
Development of Econophysics: A Biased Account and Perspective from Kolkata
Chakrabarti, B. K., & Sinha, A. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23020254 · Cited by 11
Self-citationInitial State Encoding via Reverse Quantum Annealing and H-Gain Features
Pelofske, E., Hahn, G., & Djidjev, H. N. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2023.3319586 · Cited by 15
Thermal, quantum and simulated quantum annealing: analytical comparisons for simple models
Bapst, V., & Semerjian, G. (2013) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/473/1/012011 · Cited by 13
Bera, A., Rakshit, D., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.224441 · Cited by 12
Mishra, U., Rakshit, D., Prabhu, R., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/8/083044 · Cited by 14
Hybrid Quantum Systems with Artificial Atoms in Solid State
Chia, C., Huang, D., Leong, V., Kong, J. F., & Goh, K. E. J. (2024) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202300461 · Cited by 15
Cyclic quantum annealing: searching for deep low-energy states in 5000-qubit spin glass
Zhang, H., Boothby, K., & Kamenev, A. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-80761-z · Cited by 11
Stark localization near Aubry-André criticality
Sahoo, A., Saha, A., & Rakshit, D. (2025) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.024205 · Cited by 15
Deep Learning Quantum States for Hamiltonian Estimation
Ma, X., Tu, Z. C., & Ran, S.-J. (2021) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/38/11/110301 · Cited by 15
Bera, A., Rakshit, D., Lewenstein, M., Sen, A., Sen, U., & Wehr, J. (2016) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.014421 · Cited by 11
Fiorelli, E., Rotondo, P., Marcuzzi, M., Garrahan, J. P., & Lesanovsky, I. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.032126 · Cited by 12
Classical Simulation and Theory of Quantum Annealing in a Thermal Environment
Oshiyama, H., Suzuki, S., & Shibata, N. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.170502 · Cited by 11
Huang, Z., Zhang, J., Wu, M., Li, X., & Dong, Y. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3070650 · Cited by 11
Das, A., & Chakrabarti, B. K. (2008) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.78.061121 · Cited by 11
Self-citationWhat Is Consciousness? Artificial Intelligence, Real Intelligence, Quantum Mind, and QualiaPreprint
Kauffman, S. A., & Roli, A. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3zbnj · Cited by 11
Exploration of new chemical materials using black-box optimization with the D-wave quantum annealer
Doi, M., Nakao, Y., Tanaka, T., Sako, M., & Ohzeki, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2023.1286226 · Cited by 16
Ultra-cold atoms as quantum simulators for relativistic phenomena
Schützhold, R. (2025) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2025.104198 · Cited by 15
Review of the application of quantum annealing-related technologies in transportation optimization
Mohammed, M. Q., Meeß, H., & Otte, M. (2025) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-025-04870-y · Cited by 12
Transitionless driving on adiabatic search algorithm
Oh, S., & Kais, S. (2014) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4903451 · Cited by 10
Hybrid quantum computing with ancillas
Proctor, T. J., & Kendon, V. M. (2016) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107514.2016.1152700 · Cited by 9
Characterizing the Non-equilibrium Dynamics of Field-Driven Correlated Quantum Systems
Fotso, H. F., & Freericks, J. K. (2020) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00324 · Cited by 10
4-Clique network minor embedding for quantum annealers
Pelofske, E. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.034023 · Cited by 11
Quantum search using non-Hermitian adiabatic evolution
Nesterov, A. I., & Berman, G. P. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.052316 · Cited by 10
Eigenstates Transition without Undergoing an Adiabatic Process
Mostafavi, F., Yuan, L., & Ramezani, H. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.050404 · Cited by 11
How Small-World Interactions Can Lead to Improved Quantum Annealer Designs
Katzgraber, H. G., & Novotny, M. A. (2018) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.10.054004 · Cited by 10
Arai, S., Ohzeki, M., & Tanaka, K. (2019) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.99.032120 · Cited by 11
A double-slit proposal for quantum annealing
Munoz-Bauza, H., Chen, H., & Lidar, D. A. (2019) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 10
Yacoby, R., Schaar, N., Kellerhals, L., Raz, O., Hermelin, D., & Pugatch, R. (2022) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.105.035305 · Cited by 11
Ising Machines for Diophantine Problems in Physics
Abel, S. A., & Nutricati, L. A. (2022) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.202200114 · Cited by 10
Optimizing the Production of Test Vehicles Using Hybrid Constrained Quantum Annealing
Glos, A., Kundu, A., & Salehi, Ö. (2023) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-023-02071-x · Cited by 11
Non-Hermitian quantum annealing in the ferromagnetic Ising model
Nesterov, A. I., Zepeda, J. C. B., & Berman, G. P. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.042332 · Cited by 10
Explorations of Quantum-Classical Approaches to Scheduling a Mars Lander Activity Problem
Tran, T. T., Wang, Z., Minh, N., Rieffel, E. G., Frank, J., O’Gorman, B., Venturelli, D., & Beck, J. C. (2016) · National Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 10
Sensitivity of quantum speedup by quantum annealing to a noisy oracle
Muthukrishnan, S., Albash, T., & Lidar, D. A. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.032324 · Cited by 8
On good encodings for quantum annealer and digital optimization solvers
Ceselli, A., & Premoli, M. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-32232-0 · Cited by 10
Schuetz, M. J. A., Andrist, R. S., Salton, G., Yalovetzky, R., Raymond, R., Sun, Y., Acharya, A., Chakrabarti, S., Pistoia, M., & Katzgraber, H. G. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/7dkh-crjj · Cited by 9
A quantum annealing approach to ionic diffusion in solids
Utimula, K., Ichibha, T., Prayogo, G. I., Hongo, K., Nakano, K., & Maezono, R. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86274-3 · Cited by 10
Low-temperature environments for quantum computation and quantum simulation*
Fu, H., Wang, P., Hu, Z., Li, Y., & Lin, X. (2020) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/abd762 · Cited by 10
Solving systems of Boolean multivariate equations with quantum annealing
Ramos-Calderer, S., Bravo-Prieto, C., Lin, R., Bellini, E., Manzano, M., Aaraj, N., & Latorre, J. I. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013096 · Cited by 9
Quantum annealing with twisted fields
Imoto, T., Seki, Y., Matsuzaki, Y., & Kawabata, S. (2022) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac9155 · Cited by 10
Quantum-inspired optimization for wavelength assignment
Boev, A. S., Usmanov, S. R., Semenov, A. M., Ushakova, M. M., Salahov, G. V., Mastiukova, A. S., Kiktenko, E. O., & Fedorov, A. K. (2023) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.1092065 · Cited by 11
Quantum optimization within lattice gauge theory model on a quantum simulator
Yan, Z., Zhou, Z., Zhou, Y.-H., Wang, Y.-C., Qiu, X., Meng, Z. Y., & Zhang, X. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00755-z · Cited by 14
Quantum image denoising: a framework via Boltzmann machines, QUBO, and quantum annealing
Kerger, P., & Miyazaki, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2023.1281100 · Cited by 8
Quantum annealing with error mitigation
Shingu, Y., Nikuni, T., Kawabata, S., & Matsuzaki, Y. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.042606 · Cited by 12
Incentivizing Demand-Side Response Through Discount Scheduling Using Hybrid Quantum Optimization
Bucher, D., Nüßlein, J., O’Meara, C., Angelov, I. B., Wimmer, B., Ghosh, K., Cortiana, G., & Linnhoff–Popien, C. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2024.3407236 · Cited by 12
Quantum phase transition in a disordered long-range transverse Ising antiferromagnet
Chandra, A. K., Inoue, J., & Chakrabarti, B. K. (2010) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.81.021101 · Cited by 9
Self-citationDeterministic quantum annealing expectation-maximization algorithm
Miyahara, H., Tsumura, K., & Sughiyama, Y. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/aa967e · Cited by 9
Feeding the multitude: A polynomial-time algorithm to improve sampling
Ochoa, A. J., Jacob, D. C., Mandrà, S., & Katzgraber, H. G. (2019) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.99.043306 · Cited by 9
Quantum simulation and optimization in hot quantum networks
Schuetz, M. J. A., Vermersch, B., Kirchmair, G., Vandersypen, L. M. K., Cirac, J. I., Lukin, M. D., & Zoller, P. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.241302 · Cited by 9
Schmidt, S. (2016) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/91/7/073006 · Cited by 9
Effective spin models of Kerr-nonlinear parametric oscillators for quantum annealing
Miyazaki, R. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.062457 · Cited by 9
Multiobjective Optimization in a Quantum Adiabatic Computer
Barán, B., & Villagra, M. (2016) · Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2016.12.003 · Cited by 9
Exciton-polariton Josephson junctions at finite temperatures
Lebedev, M. E., Dolinina, D. A., Hong, K., Lu, T., Kavokin, A. V., & Alodjants, A. P. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09824-8 · Cited by 9
On the Question of Ergodicity in Quantum Spin Glass Phase and Its Role in Quantum Annealing
Mukherjee, S., & Chakrabarti, B. K. (2019) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.88.061004 · Cited by 9
Self-citationUnconventional quantum annealing methods for difficult trial problems
Tang, Z., & Kapit, E. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.032612 · Cited by 8
Sampling a Rare Protein Transition Using Quantum Annealing
Ghamari, D., Covino, R., & Faccioli, P. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01174 · Cited by 8
Endo, K., Matsuda, Y., Tanaka, S., & Muramatsu, M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0304594 · Cited by 12
Gangopadhay, N., & Choudhury, S. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/bzcf-gm89 · Cited by 9
Lossy compression of statistical data using quantum annealer
Yoon, B., Nguyen, N. T. T., Chang, C. C., & Rrapaj, E. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07539-z · Cited by 8
Starchl, E., & Ritsch, H. (2022) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ac489a · Cited by 8
Okada, K. N., Nishi, H., Kosugi, T., & Matsushita, Y. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50406-8 · Cited by 9
Highly Versatile FPGA-Implemented Cyber Coherent Ising Machine
Aonishi, T., Nagasawa, T., Koizumi, T., Gunathilaka, M. D. S. H., Mimura, K., Okada, M., Kako, S., & Yamamoto, Y. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3504008 · Cited by 8
Dissipative Landau-Zener tunneling in the crossover regime from weak to strong environment coupling
Dai, X., Trappen, R., Chen, H., Melanson, D., Yurtalan, M. A., Tennant, D., Martinez, A., Tang, Y., Mozgunov, E., Gibson, J., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55588-x · Cited by 12
Quantum random walk: Effect of quenching
Goswami, S., & Sen, P. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.022314 · Cited by 8
Non-Hermitian quantum annealing in the antiferromagnetic Ising chain
Nesterov, A. I., Berman, G. P., Zepeda, J. C. B., & Bishop, A. R. (2013) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-013-0656-z · Cited by 8
Susa, Y., & Nishimori, H. (2020) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.89.044006 · Cited by 8
Quantum Computing vs. Coherent Computing
Yamamoto, Y., Takata, K., & Utsunomiya, S. (2012) · New Generation Computing · doi:10.1007/s00354-012-0403-5 · Cited by 8
Nonequilibrium work performed in quantum annealing
Ohzeki, M., & Nishimori, H. (2011) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/302/1/012047 · Cited by 8
Performance of quantum annealing in solving optimization problems: A review
Suzuki, S. (2015) · The European Physical Journal Special Topics · doi:10.1140/epjst/e2015-02342-4 · Cited by 8
Linked Markovian quantum tunnels: An approximation technique for solving the bin packing problem
Ligeiro, R. (2017) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2017.03.004 · Cited by 8
Quantum annealing speedup of embedded problems via suppression of Griffiths singularities
Knysh, S., Plamadeala, E., & Venturelli, D. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.220407 · Cited by 8
Efficient numerical simulation of complex Josephson quantum circuitsPreprint
Kerman, A. J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.14929 · Cited by 19
Schuld, M., & Petruccione, F. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7502-7_913-2 · Cited by 9
Optimized QUBO formulation methods for quantum computing
Santis, D. D., Tirone, S., Marmi, S., & Giovannetti, V. (2026) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ae3b70 · Cited by 9
Practicality of a quantum adiabatic algorithm for chemistry applications
Granet, E., Ghanem, K., & Dreyer, H. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.022428 · Cited by 10
Quantum Computing for Genomics: Conceptual Challenges and Practical Perspectives
Maurizio, A., & Mazzola, G. (2025) · PRX Life · doi:10.1103/h49j-bsc6 · Cited by 17
QISS: Quantum-Enhanced Sustainable Security Incident Handling in the IoT
Blanco, C., Santos-Olmo, A., & Sánchez, L. E. (2024) · Information · doi:10.3390/info15040181 · Cited by 7
Arai, D., Okada, K. N., Nakano, Y., Mitarai, K., & Fujii, K. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.013035 · Cited by 7
QUBO Formulations and Characterization of Penalty Parameters for the Multi-Knapsack Problem
Güney, E., Ehrenthal, J. C. F., & Hanne, T. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3550788 · Cited by 7
Leclerc, L., Dalyac, C., Bendotti, P., Griset, R., Mikael, J., & Henriet, L. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.032611 · Cited by 7
Rajak, A., & Chakrabarti, B. K. (2014) · Indian Journal of Physics · doi:10.1007/s12648-014-0483-9 · Cited by 7
Self-citationQuantum Monte Carlo annealing with multi-spin dynamics
Mazzola, G., & Troyer, M. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/aa6de1 · Cited by 7
Quintuple: A Tool for Introducing Quantum Computing Into the Classroom
Moran, C. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2018.00069 · Cited by 7
Separability and Nonseparability of Elastic States in Arrays of One-Dimensional Elastic Waveguides
Deymier, P. A., Vasseur, J. O., Runge, K., & Lucas, P. (2018) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.77237 · Cited by 7
Noise-tolerant quantum speedups in quantum annealing without fine tuning
Kapit, E., & Oganesyan, V. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abd59a · Cited by 8
Improving Schrödinger Equation Implementations with Gray Code for Adiabatic Quantum Computers
Chang, C. C., McElvain, K., Rrapaj, E., & Wu, Y. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.020356 · Cited by 7
Dynamical Uncertainty Propagation with Noisy Quantum Parameters
Dalgaard, M., Weidner, C. A., & Motzoi, F. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.150503 · Cited by 7
Tennant, D., Dai, X., Martinez, A. J., Trappen, R., Melanson, D., Yurtalan, M. A., Tang, Y., Bedkihal, S., Yang, R., Novikov, S., et al. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00590-8 · Cited by 6
Enhancing precision of atomic clocks by tuning disorder in accessories
Bhattacharyya, A., Ghoshal, A., & Sen, U. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.012620 · Cited by 7
Mechanism of Slow Relaxation due to Screening Effect in a Frustrated System
Tanaka, S., & Miyashita, S. (2009) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.1143/jpsj.78.084002 · Cited by 7
Relationship between minimum gap and success probability in adiabatic quantum computing
Cullimore, M., Everitt, M. J., Ormerod, M. A., Samson, J. H., Wilson, R. D., & Zagoskin, A. M. (2012) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/45/50/505305 · Cited by 7
Kaneko, K., & Nishimori, H. (2015) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.84.094001 · Cited by 7
Oscillating potential well in the complex plane and the adiabatic theorem
Longhi, S. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.042101 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Das, A., & Chakrabarti, B. K.
- Affiliations
- Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (IN)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-09-05
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1061-1081
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W174492123
- Cited by
- 700
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 22.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
- Keywords
- quantum annealing, quantum fluctuations, spin glass, quantum spin glass, combinatorial optimization, annealing behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review