Cited by 1,883Nuclear physics research studiesQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 510 of the 526 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modern theory of nuclear forces

Open access
Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W., Meißner, Ulf-G.·2009·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

Effective field theory allows for a systematic and model-independent derivation of the forces between nucleons in harmony with the symmetries of quantum chromodynamics. The foundations of this approach are reviewed and its application for light nuclei at various resolution scales is discussed. The extension of this approach to many-body systems is sketched.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.81.1773

Cites

510 of 510 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 526 references

16 of the 526 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1007/s100530050518 · DOI
  2. Bertsch, G. F., 2007, SciDAC Rev., 6, 42
  3. Biegun, A., 2006, Acta Phys. Pol. B, 37, 213
  4. Brown, G. E., 1970, Comments Nucl. Part. Phys., 4, 140
  5. Danilov, G., 1961, Sov. Phys. JETP, 13, 349
  6. de Swart, J. J., 1997, πN Newslett., 13, 96
  7. Henley, E. M., 1979, Rho M. Wilkinson D: Mesons in Nuclei
  8. Ishii, N., 2007, PoS, LAT2007, 146
  9. Lepage, G. P., 1989, From Actions to Answers
  10. Rozpedzik, D., 2006, Acta Phys. Pol. B, 37, 2889
  11. Serot, B. D., 1986, Adv. Nucl. Phys., 16, 1
  12. Skorniakov, G. V., 1957, Sov. Phys. JETP, 4, 648
  13. Srivastava, M. K., 1975, Adv. Nucl. Phys., 8, 131
  14. Yukawa, H., 1935, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn., 17, 48

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W., & Meißner, U.-G.
Affiliations
University of Bonn (DE)
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
2009-12-21
Volume
81
Issue
4
Pages
1773-1825
ISSN
  • 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0756
OpenAlex
W2096487969
Cited by
1,883
References
526
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 157 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 123 · 2016: 139 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 118 · 2013: 93 · 2012: 79
FWCI
36.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
  • JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
effective field theory, nucleon-nucleon interaction, nuclear forces, light nuclei, many-body systems, chiral effective field theory, resolution scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review