The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Domain wall nanoelectronics
Open accessAbstract
Domains in ferroelectrics were considered to be well understood by the middle of the last century: They were generally rectilinear, and their walls were Ising-like. Their simplicity stood in stark contrast to the more complex Bloch walls or N\'eel walls in magnets. Only within the past decade and with the introduction of atomic-resolution studies via transmission electron microscopy, electron holography, and atomic force microscopy with polarization sensitivity has their real complexity been revealed. Additional phenomena appear in recent studies, especially of magnetoelectric materials, where functional properties inside domain walls are being directly measured. In this paper these studies are reviewed, focusing attention on ferroelectrics and multiferroics but making comparisons where possible with magnetic domains and domain walls. An important part of this review will concern device applications, with the spotlight on a new paradigm of ferroic devices where the domain walls, rather than the domains, are the active element. Here magnetic wall microelectronics is already in full swing, owing largely to the work of Cowburn and of Parkin and their colleagues. These devices exploit the high domain wall mobilities in magnets and their resulting high velocities, which can be supersonic, as shown by Kreines' and co-workers 30 years ago. By comparison, nanoelectronic devices employing ferroelectric domain walls often have slower domain wall speeds, but may exploit their smaller size as well as their different functional properties. These include domain wall conductivity (metallic or even superconducting in bulk insulating or semiconducting oxides) and the fact that domain walls can be ferromagnetic while the surrounding domains are not.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Davis, M., Damjanovic, D., & Setter, N. (2006) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2358408 · Cited by 95
Cited by
Advances in magnetoelectric multiferroics
Spaldin, N. A., & Ramesh, R. (2019) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-018-0275-2 · Cited by 1,766
Self-citationResistive switching materials for information processing
Wang, Z., Wu, H., Burr, G. W., Hwang, C. S., Wang, K. L., Xia, Q., & Yang, J. J. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0159-3 · Cited by 1,214
BiFeO3epitaxial thin films and devices: past, present and future
Sando, D., Barthélémy, A., & Bibes, M. (2014) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/26/47/473201 · Cited by 353
Direct and indirect measurements on electrocaloric effect: Recent developments and perspectives
Liu, Y., Scott, J. F., & Dkhil, B. (2016) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.4958327 · Cited by 319
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Catalan, G., Seidel, J., Ramesh, R., & Scott, J. F.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-02-03
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-156
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2022193985
- Cited by
- 1,265
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Domain wall nanoelectronics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.84.119
- The paper
- Catalan, G., Seidel, J., Ramesh, R., & Scott, J. F. (2012). Domain wall nanoelectronics. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.84.119
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.