The DOI matches its Crossref record; 524 of the 524 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 298 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications
Open accessAbstract
The electronic ground state of a periodic system is usually described in terms of extended Bloch orbitals, but an alternative representation in terms of localized ``Wannier functions'' was introduced by Gregory Wannier in 1937. The connection between the Bloch and Wannier representations is realized by families of transformations in a continuous space of unitary matrices, carrying a large degree of arbitrariness. Since 1997, methods have been developed that allow one to iteratively transform the extended Bloch orbitals of a first-principles calculation into a unique set of maximally localized Wannier functions, accomplishing the solid-state equivalent of constructing localized molecular orbitals, or ``Boys orbitals'' as previously known from the chemistry literature. These developments are reviewed here, and a survey of the applications of these methods is presented. This latter includes a description of their use in analyzing the nature of chemical bonding, or as a local probe of phenomena related to electric polarization and orbital magnetization. Wannier interpolation schemes are also reviewed, by which quantities computed on a coarse reciprocal-space mesh can be used to interpolate onto much finer meshes at low cost, and applications in which Wannier functions are used as efficient basis functions are discussed. Finally the construction and use of Wannier functions outside the context of electronic-structure theory is presented, for cases that include phonon excitations, photonic crystals, and cold-atom optical lattices.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review surveys the theory and applications of maximally localized Wannier functions (MLWFs), emphasizing the Marzari-Vanderbilt localization method and its use across electronic-structure problems. It covers chemical bonding analysis, electric polarization and orbital magnetization, Wannier interpolation, large-scale/strongly correlated calculations, and extensions to phonons, photonic crystals, and cold atoms.
Key findings
- MLWFs give chemically intuitive localized orbitals: for Si and GaAs, the four valence bands yield four bond-centered sp³-like MLWFs, with the GaAs bond shifted toward the more electronegative As atom.
- Wannier centers connect directly to Berry-phase electric polarization, and the Wannier representation was used to derive bulk formulas for orbital magnetization; in bcc Fe, the interstitial contribution to spontaneous orbital magnetization exceeds 30%.
- Wannier interpolation reproduces fine band-structure features from coarse first-principles meshes, e.g. spin-orbit-coupled bcc Fe bands from an 8×8×8 q-grid, a metallic (5,5) carbon nanotube in a 100-atom supercell, and GW quasiparticle bands of SrTiO₃.
- Anomalous Hall conductivities calculated with Wannier interpolation are tabulated as 753 S/cm for bcc Fe, −2203 S/cm for fcc Ni, and 477 S/cm for hcp Co via Berry curvature, compared with experimental values of 1032, −646, and 480 S/cm, respectively.
Methods
- Review article synthesizing theory and applications of WFs/MLWFs; no new primary calculations are reported.
- Covers construction methods including projection, maximal localization, disentanglement for entangled bands, Γ-point/supercell formulations, and Wannier interpolation.
- Surveys applications in electronic structure, polarization/magnetization, transport, strongly correlated systems, and non-electronic contexts such as phonons, photonic crystals, and cold-atom optical lattices.
Limitations
- The paper states that WFs are strongly non-unique, with no preferred gauge assigned by the Schrödinger equation; different localization criteria can produce qualitatively different representations of chemical bonds.
- Local minima of the spread functional can yield non-meaningful localized orbitals, a problem more pronounced for entangled bands and usually alleviated by projection or better initial guesses.
- The paper notes that chemical interpretation is most appropriate when MLWFs span the occupied subspace; including unoccupied states makes them a minimal tight-binding basis rather than necessarily bonding descriptors, and WF-based molecular dipoles are heuristic and not experimentally measurable even in principle.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 298 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From these four bands, one obtains four equivalent WFs per unit cell, each localized on one of the four nearest-neighbor Si-Si or Ga-As bonds.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The presence of a bond-centered inversion symmetry for Si, but not GaAs, is clearly reflected in the shapes of the WFs.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the overall agreement is quite good, significant deviations can be seen wherever higher unoccupied and unwanted states possessing some significant sp 3 character are admixed into the projected manifold.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As an example, we plot in Fig. 5 the eight disentangled bands obtained by projecting the band structure of silicon, taken within an energy window that coincides with the entire energy axis shown, onto eight atomic-like sp 3 hybrids.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in this case, bands up to 20 eV above the Fermi energy can be meaningfully described with a minimal basis set of seven orbitals, that would have been difficult to identify using only educated guesses for the projections.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The bands that result from projecting onto five d -type atomic orbitals are shown as blue triangles in Fig. 7. They follow very closely the first-principles bands away from the s -d hybridization regions, where the interpolated bands remain narrow.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By choosing different dimensions for the disentangled subspace, it was found that the composite set of bands is faithfully represented by seven MLWFs, of which five are the standard d -like orbitals, and the remaining two are s -like orbitals centered at the tetrahedral interstitial sites of the fcc structure.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such disentangled MLWFs, e.g., the p z MLWFs describing the π / π ∗ manifold of graphene shown in Fig. 6, are found to be strongly localized.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, it can be seen that in gallium arsenide this covalent bond and its WFC are shifted towards the more electronegative arsenic atom.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A recent comparison of static polarizabilities for molecules, calculated using Eq. (89) with both MLWFs and NGWFs, demonstrates remarkable agreement between the two (O'Regan et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites O'Regan et al., 2012
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Minimization of an appropriate energy functional with respect to the degrees of freedom present in the density matrix leads to ground-state non-orthogonal orbitals that are very similar in appearance to (orthogonal) MLWFs.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These are obtained from the closed manifold of four valence bands, yielding four equivalent MLWFs that map into one another under the space-group symmetry operations of the crystal.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Symmetric orthonormalization of the three NMTOs gives the familiar set of three symmetry related σ -bonding orbitals (compare with the MLWF of graphene in Fig. 6).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“It was found that both schemes gave essentially identical orbitals.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lechermann et al., 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For these bands the agreement with the full calculation is perfect to within the resolution of the figure.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zurek et al., 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For crystalline silicon, the four-dimensional manifold disentangled from the lowest part of the conduction bands gives rise to four identical antibonding orbitals (see Fig. 13) originating from the destructive interference of two atomic sp 3 orbitals centered on neighboring atoms, to be contrasted with the constructive interference shown in Fig. 2 for the valence WFs.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, referring back to Fig. 6) we recall that the band structure of graphene can be described accurately by disentangling the partially occupied π manifold from the higher free-electron parabolic bands and the antibonding sp 2 bands.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In this latter case, the bond-centered MLWFs come from the constructive superposition of two sp 2 orbitals pointing towards each other from adjacent carbons (Lee et al. , 2005).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al., 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For the doubly charged split-vacancy configuration, the ionic relaxation is such that one of the nearest neighbors of the vacancy site moves halfway towards the vacancy, relocating to the center of an octahedral cage of silicon atoms.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Corsetti and Mostofi, 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Somewhere in between, it is worth pointing out that the atom-centered sp 3 orbitals typical of group-IV or III-V semiconductors, that can be obtained in the diamond/zincblende structure by disentangling the lowest 4 conduction bands, can have a major lobe pointing either to the center of the bond or in the opposite direction (Lee, 2006; Wahn and Neugebauer, 2006).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee, 2006
- Not checked yetcites Wahn and Neugebauer, 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A classic example is shown in Fig. 15, showing for BaTiO 3 the three MLWFs per oxygen derived from the nine oxygen 2 p bands.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This gives rise to six defect WFs, each corresponding to a bond between sp 3 d 2 hybrids on the central atom and dangling sp 3 orbitals on the neighbors, as shown in the last panel of Fig. 19.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Corsetti and Mostofi, 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, an eight-dimensional manifold disentangled from an energy window including both the valence bands and the lowest part of the conduction bands gives rise to the atomic sp 3 tight-binding orbitals of crystalline silicon (see Fig. 14).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“On the contrary, as discussed in Sec. II.I.2 and shown in Fig. 8, a very good tight-binding basis for 3 d metals such as Cu can be constructed (Souza et al. , 2001) with 5 atom-centered d -like orbitals and two s -like orbitals in the interstitial positions.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Souza et al., 2001
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Tang and IsmailBeigi (2009) were also able to study the evolution of 2D boron sheets as they were made more compact (from hexagonal to triangular), and showed that the in-plane bonding pattern of the hexagonal system was preserved, with only minor changes in the shape and position of the MLWFs.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tang and IsmailBeigi, 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The analysis of the 'bond angles' formed by two WFCs and their common Si atom shows considerable departure from the tetrahedral rule at the transition pressure.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Martonak et al., 2000
- Not checked yetcites Martonak et al., 2001
- Not checked yetcites Molteni et al., 2001
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This work also demonstrated the importance of including the occupied defect levels in the gap when constructing the relevant WFs, which are shown in the first two panels of Fig. 19.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Corsetti and Mostofi, 2011
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These features were shown to be in conflict with the behavior of widely-used empirical models.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Silvestrelli and Parrinello, 1999a
- Not checked yetcites Silvestrelli and Parrinello, 1999b
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The figure illustrates this process for σ -oriented oxygen WFs, but a similar effect occurs for the π -oriented oxygen WFs, and the total anomalous dynamical charge can be accounted for quantitatively on the basis of the distortion-induced changes of each kind of WF in the crystal (Marzari and Vanderbilt, 1998).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Marzari and Vanderbilt, 1998
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Since 1997, methods have been developed that allow one to iteratively transform the extended Bloch orbitals of a first-principles calculation into a unique set of maximally localized Wannier functions”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Marzari and Vanderbilt, 1997
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“but its implementation in the solid-state context required significant developments, due to the ill-conditioned nature of the position operator in periodic systems (Nenciu, 1991), that was clarified in the context of the 'modern theory' of polarization (King-Smith and Vanderbilt, 1993; Resta, 1994).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nenciu, 1991
- Not checked yetcites King-Smith and Vanderbilt, 1993
- Not checked yetcites Resta, 1994
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, the charge density obtained by summing the squares of the Bloch functions | ψ n k 〉 or the WFs | R n 〉 is identical; a similar reasoning applies to the trace of any one-particle operator.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Marzari and Vanderbilt showed that the minimization of a localization functional corresponding to the sum of the second-moment spread of each Wannier charge density about its own center of charge was both formally attractive and computationally tractable.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Marzari and Vanderbilt, 1997
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: The band of interest is isolated, remaining separated by a gap from the bands below and above at all k.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, both sets of states provide an equally valid description of the band subspace, even if the WFs are not Hamiltonian eigenstates.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is easily shown that the | R n 〉 form an orthonormal set (see Sec. II.A.3)”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The transformations of Eqs. (3) and (4) constitute a unitary transformation between Bloch and Wannier states.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“and that two WFs | R n 〉 and | R ′ n 〉 transform into each other under translation by the lattice vector R -R ′ (Blount, 1962).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Blount, 1962
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the theory of WFs is made more complex by the presence of a 'gauge freedom' that exists in the definition of the ψ n k .”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A major reason for this is that WFs are strongly non-unique.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, even before one could attempt to compute the WFs for a given material, one had first to resolve the question of which states to use to compute WFs.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But k lives in the periodic Brillouin zone, so the best we can do is to choose equal amplitudes all across the Brillouin zone.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: The band of interest is isolated, remaining separated by a gap from the bands below and above at all k.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The independent-particle approximation is valid for describing the electronic ground state.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More interestingly, there are formal connections between the centers of charge of the WFs and the Berry phases of the Bloch functions as they are carried around the Brillouin zone.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Bloch and WFs span the same Hilbert space.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This second indeterminacy is all the more troublesome in the common case of degeneracy for the occupied bands at certain highsymmetry points in the Brillouin zone, making a partition into separate 'bands', that could separately be transformed in Wannier functions, problematic.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“An important development in this regard was the introduction by Marzari and Vanderbilt (1997) of a 'maximal localization' criterion for identifying a unique set of WFs for a given crystalline insulator.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Marzari and Vanderbilt, 1997
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: The band of interest is isolated, remaining separated by a gap from the bands below and above at all k.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To get a very localized wave packet in real space, we need to use a very broad superposition in k space.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: The band of interest is isolated, remaining separated by a gap from the bands below and above at all k.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The independent-particle approximation is valid for describing the electronic ground state.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the minimum, the off-diagonal elements |〈 R m | r | 0 n 〉| 2 are as small as possible, realizing the best compromise in the simultaneous diagonalization, within the subspace of the Bloch bands considered, of the three position operators x , y and z , which do not in general commute when projected onto this space.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, in many applications the bands of interest are not isolated.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These | ˜ ψ n k 〉 have now a smooth gauge in k , are related to the original | ψ n k 〉 by a unitary transformation, 3 and when substituted into Eq. (3) in place of the | ψ n k 〉 result in a set of well-localized WFs.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We emphasize that the trial functions do not need to resemble the target WFs closely; it is often sufficient to choose simple analytic functions (e.g., spherical harmonics times Gaussians) provided they are roughly located on sites where WFs are expected to be centered and have appropriate angular character.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These overlaps play a central role in the formalism, since all contributions to the localization functional can be expressed in terms of them.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also emphasize that there is no 'preferred gauge' assigned by the Schr¨ odinger equation to the Bloch orbitals.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The problem of computing well localized WFs starting from entangled bands is thus broken down into two distinct steps, subspace selection and gauge selection.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Once again, we emphasize that the gauge freedom expressed in Eq. (8) implies that the WFs are strongly nonunique.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Traces over this band manifold are invariant with respect to any unitary transformation among the J occupied Bloch orbitals at a given wavevector”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It should be noted that the localization functional can display, in addition to the desired global minimum, multiple local minima that do not lead to the construction of meaningful localized orbitals.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The difficulty in treating entangled bands stems from the fact that it is unclear exactly which states to choose to form J WFs, particularly in those regions of k -space where the bands of interest are hybridized with other unwanted bands.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The problem arises when there are degeneracies among the bands in question at certain locations in the Brillouin zone.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“is invariant, even though the | ˜ ψ n k 〉 resulting from Eq. (8) are no longer generally eigenstates of H , and n is no longer a band index in the usual sense.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this sense, the WFs are 'more non-unique' than the Bloch functions, which only acquire a phase change.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“is invariant, even though the | ˜ ψ n k 〉 resulting from Eq. (8) are no longer generally eigenstates of H , and n is no longer a band index in the usual sense.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“is invariant, even though the | ˜ ψ n k 〉 resulting from Eq. (8) are no longer generally eigenstates of H , and n is no longer a band index in the usual sense.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For this purpose, the projection method already described in Sec. II.B has been found to be extremely effective.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a result, band four is nonanalytic in k in the vicinity of Γ.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we will see, the same guiding principle can be used for both steps, namely, to achieve 'smoothness' in k -space.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That is, if we simply insert the usual Bloch functions | ψ n k 〉 , defined to be eigenstates of H , into the right-hand side of Eq. (3), it is generally not possible to produce well-localized WFs.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That is, different choices of smooth gauge correspond to different sets of WFs having in general different shapes and spreads.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the non-uniqueness of the WFs resulting from Eq. (3) is unavoidable.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These | ˜ ψ n k 〉 have now a smooth gauge in k , are related to the original | ψ n k 〉 by a unitary transformation, 3 and when substituted into Eq. (3) in place of the | ψ n k 〉 result in a set of well-localized WFs.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note in passing that the | ˜ ψ n k 〉 are uniquely defined by the trial orbitals g n ( r ) and the chosen (isolated) manifold, since any arbitrary unitary rotation among the | ψ n k 〉 orbitals cancels out exactly and does not affect the outcome of Eq. 16, eliminating thus any gauge freedom.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consider, for example, what happens if we try to construct a single WF from the highest occupied band n = 4 in GaAs. This would be doomed to failure, since this band becomes degenerate with bands two and three at the zone center, Γ, as shown in Fig. 3.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The more complex problem of exponential localization of MLWFs for composite bands in 2D and 3D was finally proven by Panati and Pisante (2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Panati and Pisante (2011)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The early work on composite bands in 3D only established the exponential localization of the projection operator P , Eq. (13), not of the WFs themselves (des Cloizeaux, 1964a).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites des Cloizeaux, 1964a
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Marzari and Vanderbilt (1997) established this in 1D, by simply noting that the MLWF construction then reduces to finding the eigenstates of the projected position operator PxP , a case for which exponential localization had already been proven (Niu, 1991).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Marzari and Vanderbilt (1997)
- Not checked yetcites Niu, 1991
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The question of exponential decay in 2D and 3D was finally settled by Brouder et al. (2007) who showed, as a corollary to a theorem by Panati (2007), that a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of exponentially localized WFs in 2D and 3D is that the so-called 'Chern invariants' for the composite set of bands vanish identically.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brouder et al. (2007)
- Not checked yetcites Panati (2007)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The method is successful as long as the inner-product matrix A k does not become singular (or nearly so) for any k , which can be ensured by checking that the ratio of maximum and minimum values of det S k in the Brillouin zone does not become too large.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Fourier transform of Eq. (3) would then result in a poorly localized object having power-law tails in real space.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This turns out to be the solid-state equivalent of the Foster-Boys criterion of quantum chemistry (Boys, 1960, 1966; Foster and Boys, 1960a,b).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boys, 1960, 1966
- Not checked yetcites Foster and Boys, 1960a,b
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The minimization procedure of Ω thus actually corresponds to the minimization of the non-invariant part ˜ Ω only.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, spherical ( s -like) Gaussians located at the bond centers will suffice for the construction of well-localized WFs, akin to those shown in Fig. 2, spanning the four occupied valence bands of semiconductors such as Si and GaAs.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These | ˜ ψ n k 〉 have now a smooth gauge in k , are related to the original | ψ n k 〉 by a unitary transformation, 3 and when substituted into Eq. (3) in place of the | ψ n k 〉 result in a set of well-localized WFs.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conversely, nonzero Chern numbers pose an obstruction to finding a globally smooth gauge in k -space.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We know from Eq. (19) that the quadratic spread Ω of the WFs spanning a Bloch space of dimension J comprises two positive-definite contributions, one gauge-invariant (Ω I ), the other gaugedependent ( ˜ Ω).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The projection technique discussed in Section II.B can be easily adapted to produce J smoothly-varying Bloch-like states starting from a larger set of Bloch bands (Souza et al. , 2001).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Souza et al., 2001
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As it turns out, smoothness in k of a Bloch space is precisely what is measured by the functional Ω I introduced in Sec. II.C.1.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Alternatively, it is possible to combine the two steps, and minimize Ω = Ω I + ˜ Ω simultaneously with respect to the choice of Hilbert subspace and the choice of gauge (Thygesen et al. , 2005a,b); this should lead to the most-localized set of J WFs that can be constructed from the initial J k Bloch states.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Thygesen et al., 2005a,b
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For a double bond, both the FB and ER schemes mix the σ and π orbitals, giving rise to two bent 'banana bond' (or τ ) orbitals (Pauling, 1960) as shown in Fig 10.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pauling, 1960 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For example, it often results in 'symmetry-adapted' WFs which inherit the symmetry properties of the trial orbitals (Ku et al. , 2002).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ku et al., 2002
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We infer, therefore, that such problems are associated not with the wannierization part of the procedure, but rather with the initial selection of the smooth subspace from the full manifold of entangled bands.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reason for its success is easily understood: the localization of the trial orbitals in real space leads to smoothness in k -space.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That choice ensures that at self-consistency the stationary point corresponds to the absolute minimum of Ω I .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“An iterative procedure is then used to extract selfconsistently across the BZ the J -dimensional subspaces having collectively the smallest possible value of Ω I (typically the minimization starts from an initial guess for the target subspaces given, e.g., by projection onto trial orbitals).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Souza et al., 2001
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“What Ω I manages to capture is the intrinsic smoothness of the underlying Hilbert space.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This behavior can be avoided by forcing certain Bloch states to be preserved identically in the projected manifold - we refer to those as belonging to a frozen 'inner' window, since this is often the simplest procedure for selecting them.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Viewed as function of k , the Bloch subspace obtained at the end of the minimization is 'optimally smooth' in that it changes as little as possible with k .”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Once the two-particle electron-electron interaction is formally included in the Hamiltonian, the many-body wavefunction cannot be reduced to any simple form allowing for the construction of WFs in the usual sense.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“First, it is no longer necessary to enforce explicit orthogonality constraints on the orbitals during the energy minimization procedure (Galli and Parrinello, 1992; Hern´ andez et al. , 1996; Hierse and Stechel, 1994; Mauri et al. , 1993; Ordej´ on et al. , 1993).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Galli and Parrinello, 1992
- Not checked yetcites Hernández et al., 1996
- Not checked yetcites Hierse and Stechel, 1994
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In later work it was realized (Qian et al. , 2008) that the QOs can be constructed without explicit calculation of the eigenstates outside the frozen window.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Qian et al., 2008
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Second, a nonorthogonal representation can be more localized than an essentially equivalent orthogonal one (Anderson, 1968; He and Vanderbilt, 2001).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Anderson, 1968
- Not checked yetcites He and Vanderbilt, 2001
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We now see that the spatial localization of the density matrix is closely linked to that of the Wannier functions themselves.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The common point between these variational methods is that the idempotency of the density operator or the orthogonality of the Wannier orbitals is not imposed explicitly during the minimization procedure. Instead, the energy functionals are constructed such that these properties are satisfied automatically at the minimum, which coincides with the true ground state of the system.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“It has also been shown to take the same form in metals at finite temperature, 9 but with γ determined by the ratio between the thermal energy k B T and the Fermi velocity (Goedecker, 1998).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Goedecker, 1998
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is clearly apparent that these MLWFs represent the intuitive chemical concept of a covalent bond, with each MLWF representing the bonding orbital created by the constructive interference of two atomic sp 3 orbitals centered on neighboring atoms.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“To give a specific example, accurate calculations on tetrahedral semiconductors will require the inclusion of d states in the MTO basis, i.e., nine states ( s , p , d ) per site.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lambrecht and Andersen, 1986
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The fundamental principle behind such approaches is the fact that electronic structure is inherently local (Heine, 1980), or 'nearsighted' (Kohn, 1996).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Heine, 1980
- Not checked yetcites Kohn, 1996
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One of the most notable, albeit qualitative, characteristics of MLWFs is their ability to highlight the chemical signatures of different band manifolds.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The quantity ρ ( r , r ′ ) has been shown to decay exponentially as exp( -γ | r -r ′ | ) in insulators and semiconductors, where the exponent γ can be heuristically related to the direct band gap of the system (des Cloizeaux, 1964a; Ismail-Beigi and Arias, 1999; Taraskin et al. , 2002).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites des Cloizeaux, 1964a
- Not checked yetcites Ismail-Beigi and Arias, 1999
- Not checked yetcites Taraskin et al., 2002
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since MLWFs are uniquely defined for the case of insulators and semiconductors, they are particularly suited to discuss hybridization, covalency, and ionicity both in crystalline and disordered systems.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this way, properties computed from the WFs, such as interpolated bandstructures, will have the correct symmetry properties.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This locality is exploited in linearscaling methods by retaining an amount of information in the density matrix that scales only linearly with system size.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In addition, in the supercell approximation they can be used to describe any disordered bulk, amorphous, or liquid system (Payne et al. , 1992), providing a compact description of electronic states in terms of their Wannier centers, their coordination with other atoms, and the spatial distribution and symmetry of the MLWFs.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Payne et al., 1992
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Downfolding will result in an MTO with either s or p character on a given site, with inclusion of d character on neighboring sites.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, it becomes riskier to draw conclusions from the qualitative features of the MLWFs.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whenever unoccupied states are included, MLWFs are more properly understood as forming a minimal tightbinding basis, and not necessarily as descriptors of the bonding.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Moreover, a low activation energy is required for the selfannihilation of this defect; this consideration, in combination with the 'stealth' electronic signature, hints at the reason why such a defect could have eluded experimental discovery despite the fact that Si is one of the best studied materials in the history of technology.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Goedecker et al., 2002
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ability of Wannier functions to capture the electronic structure of complex materials has also been demonstrated in the study of boron allotropes.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This purely geometrical analysis is completely blind to the actual electronic charge distribution, which ought to be important in any description of chemical bonding.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The use of MLWFs to characterize electronic bonding in complex system has been greatly aided by the implementation of efficient and robust algorithms for maximal localization of the orbitals in the case of large, and often disordered, supercells in which the Brillouin zone can be sampled at a single point, usually the zone-center Γ point (Berghold et al. , 2000; Bernasconi and Madden, 2001; Silv”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berghold et al., 2000
- Not checked yetcites Bernasconi and Madden, 2001
- Not checked yetcites Silvestrelli, 1999
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Besides its application to the study of disordered networks (Fitzhenry et al. , 2003; Lim et al. , 2002; Meregalli and Parrinello, 2001), the above analysis can also be effectively employed to elucidate the chemical and electronic properties accompanying structural transformations.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fitzhenry et al., 2003
- Not checked yetcites Lim et al., 2002
- Not checked yetcites Meregalli and Parrinello, 2001
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That is, it can reveal the atomic-like orbitals that conceptually lie behind any tight-binding formulation, but that can now be obtained directly from first principles according to a well-defined procedure.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interestingly, the MLWFs analysis can also point to structural defects that do not otherwise exhibit any significant electronic signature.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Silvestrelli et al. (1998) were the first to argue that the WFCs can be a powerful tool for understanding bonding in low-symmetry cases, representing an insightful and an economical mapping of the continuous electronic degrees of freedom into a set of classical descriptors, i.e., the center positions and spreads of the WFs.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Silvestrelli et al., 1998
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These can form the basis of the construction of Hamiltonians for model systems (e.g., strongly-correlated) or large-scale nanostructures, as will be discussed in Chap. VII.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The same e R /V describes the quantization of charge transport under an adiabatic cycle (Thouless, 1983), and indeed the shifts of Wannier charge centers under such a cycle were recently proposed as a signature of formal oxidation state in crystalline solids (Jiang et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Thouless, 1983
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This latter case is a paradigmatic example of the chemical insight that can be gleaned by following the WFCs in the course of an first-principles simulation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boero et al., 2000b
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Then, the change of polarization resulting from any physical change, such as the displacement of one atomic sublattice or the application of an electric field, can be related in a simple way to the displacements of the Wannier centers r n occurring as a result of this change.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The essential observation is that, when studying a system that is layered or stacked along the z direction, one can still work with Bloch functions labeled by k x and k y while carrying out a Wannier construction or analysis only along z .”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These theories can be formulated either in terms of Berry phases and curvatures, or equivalently, by working in the Wannier representation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites King-Smith and Vanderbilt, 1993
- Not checked yetcites Resta, 1992
- Not checked yetcites Thonhauser et al., 2005
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Moreover, Souza et al. (2000) have shown that this same quantity characterizes the root-mean-square quantum fluctuations of the macroscopic polarization.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Souza et al., 2000
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“is precisely the expression for the electronic contribution to the polarization in the Berry-phase theory (KingSmith and Vanderbilt, 1993; Resta, 1994; Vanderbilt and King-Smith, 1993), which was derived by considering the flow of charge during an arbitrary adiabatic change of the crystalline Hamiltonian.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites KingSmith and Vanderbilt, 1993
- Not checked yetcites Resta, 1994
- Not checked yetcites Vanderbilt and King-Smith, 1993
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In a related development, Stengel and Spaldin (2006a) introduced a Wannier-based method for computing polarizations along z and studying electric fields along z that work even in the case that the stacking includes metallic layers, as long as the system is effectively insulating along z (Stengel and Spaldin, 2007).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Stengel and Spaldin, 2006a
- Not checked yetcites Stengel and Spaldin, 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Wannier representation provides an alternative method for computing such dielectric quantities by finite differences.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This behavior can be understood (Posternak et al. , 1994; Zhong et al. , 1994) as arising from hybridization between neighboring O 2 p and Ti 3 d orbitals that dominate the valence and conduction bands, respectively.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Posternak et al., 1994
- Not checked yetcites Zhong et al., 1994
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This approach is now standard for treating periodic insulators in finite electric fields in density-functional theory.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nunes and Vanderbilt, 1994
- Not checked yetcites Nunes and Gonze, 2001
- Not checked yetcites Souza et al., 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A well-known feature of the Berry-phase theory is that the polarization is only well-defined modulo a quantum e R /V , where R is a real-space lattice vector.”
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The problem is that matrix elements such as 〈 ψ n k | r | ψ n k 〉 and 〈 ψ n k | r × v | ψ n k 〉 are ill-defined for such extended states (Nenciu, 1991).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nenciu, 1991
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In fact, specialized algorithms have been developed to perform on-the-fly Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics in a Wannier representation (Iftimie et al. , 2004; Sharma et al. , 2003; Wu et al. , 2009).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Iftimie et al., 2004
- Not checked yetcites Sharma et al., 2003
- Not checked yetcites Wu et al., 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Berry-phase theory can be regarded as providing a mapping of the distributed quantum-mechanical electronic charge density onto a lattice of negative point charges of charge -e , as illustrated in Fig. 21.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It should be noted that the decomposition into Wannier dipoles is closer to the decomposition of the charge density into static (Szigeti) charges than to a decomposition into dynamical (Born) charges.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In a related development, the orbital magnetoelectric coefficient α ij = ∂M orb ,j /∂ E i was found to contain an isotropic contribution having a topological character (the 'axion' contribution, corresponding to an E · B term in the effective Lagrangian).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Essin et al., 2009
- Not checked yetcites Qi et al., 2008
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While it is possible to extract the needed information from the time-time correlation function of the total polarization P ( t ) of the entire supercell as calculated using the Berry-phase approach, methods which follow the time-evolution of local dipoles, as defined via WF-based methods, provide additional insight and efficiency (Bernasconi et al. , 1998; Chen et al. , 2008; McGrath et al. , 2007”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bernasconi et al., 1998
- Not checked yetcites Chen et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites McGrath et al., 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Starting from this short-range real-space representation, the quantity f can now be accurately interpolated onto an arbitrary point k in reciprocal space by carrying out an inverse transformation (right panel).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“It is apparent that the interpolation procedure succeeds in resolving details of the true band structure on a scale much smaller than the spacing between q -points.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yates et al., 2007
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, insulators having broken time-reversal ( T ) symmetry (e.g., insulating ferromagnets and ferrimagnets) can be classified by an integer 'Chern invariant' that is proportional to the Brillouin-zone integral of the Berry curvature F n k summed over occupied bands n .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ability to compute the orbital magnetization is also of use in obtaining the magnetic shielding of nuclei. This is responsible for the chemical shift effect observed in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Zhang et al. (2010) used a simplified Wannier-based approach which succeeds in capturing the essential features of the topological surface states at a greatly reduced computational cost.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zhang et al., 2010
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Naively one might imagine computing the orbital magnetization M orb as the thermodynamic limit of Eq. (85) per unit volume for a large crystallite. However, as we discussed at the beginning of Sec. V, Bloch matrix elements of the position operator r and the circulation operator r × v are ill-defined. Therefore, such an approach is not suitable.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By virtue of the spatial localization of the WFs, F ( R ) decays rapidly with | R | .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“As already mentioned briefly in Sec. II.J, Hamann and Vanderbilt (2009) proposed using Wannier interpolation to determine the GW QP bands very efficiently and accurately at arbitrary points in the BZ.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hamann and Vanderbilt, 2009
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The Chern-Simons magnetoelectric coupling has been evaluated from first-principles with the help of WFs for both topological and ordinary insulators (Coh et al. , 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Coh et al., 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Note that the dashed lines pass through the open circles at the symmetry points, which denote exact (non-interpolated) GW results.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hamann and Vanderbilt, 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“It can be shown that a Wannier representation is not possible for a QAH insulator, and Thonhauser and Vanderbilt (2006) have explored the way in which the usual Wannier construction breaks down for model systems.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Thonhauser and Vanderbilt, 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The method is particularly useful in situations where a very fine sampling of the BZ is required to converge the quantity of interest.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Wannier band-structure interpolation is extremely accurate.”
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Localized Wannier functions are often introduced in textbooks as a formally exact localized basis spanning a band, or a group of bands, and their existence provides a rigorous justification for the tight-binding (TB) interpolation method (Ashcroft and Mermin, 1976; Harrison, 1980).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ashcroft and Mermin, 1976
- Not checked yetcites Harrison, 1980
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the case of 3D TIs, the clearest experimental signature of the Z 2 -odd character is at present provided by ARPES measurements of the surface electron bands.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This procedure will succeed in capturing variations in f ( k ) over reciprocal lengths smaller than the first-principles mesh spacing ∆ q , provided that the linear dimensions L = 2 π/ ∆ q of the equivalent supercell are large compared to the decay length of the WFs.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The comparison with the first-principles bands (solid lines), reveals essentially perfect agreement within the inner window.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wang et al., 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This feature can be exploited to calculate the diagonal elements of the Green's function matrix very efficiently using iterative schemes (Lopez-Sancho et al. , 1984, 1985).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lopez-Sancho et al., 1984
- Not checked yetcites Lopez-Sancho et al., 1985
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This term can be written as a Brillouin-zone integral of the Chern-Simons 3-form, defined in terms of multiband generalizations of the Berry connection A k and curvature F k introduced in the previous subsection (Essin et al. , 2009; Qi et al. , 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Essin et al., 2009
- Not checked yetcites Qi et al., 2008
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The nearest-neighbor coupling between principal layers means that for each k ‖ the Hamiltonian has a block tridiagonal form (the dependence of the Hamiltonian matrix on k ‖ is given by the usual Fourier sum expression).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“As the number of lattice vectors included in the summation in Eq. (98) equals the number of first-principles mesh points, beyond a certain mesh density the error incurred decreases exponentially (Yates et al. , 2007).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yates et al., 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It should be noted that this approach contains no surface-specific information, being based exclusively on the bulk WFs.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A careful generalization of Eq. (94) to the case in which a finite electric field is present has been carried out by Malashevich et al. (2010) in the Wannier representation using arguments similar to those in Secs. V.A.1 and V.C.2, and used to derive a complete expression for the orbital magnetoelectric response, of which the topological Chern-Simons term is only one contribution (Essin et al. , 2”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Essin et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Malashevich et al., 2010
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Second, depending on how their Bloch functions wrap the Brillouin zone, nonmagnetic ( T -invariant) insulators can be sorted into two classes denoted as ' Z 2 -even' and ' Z 2 -odd' (after the name Z 2 of the group { 0, 1 } under addition modulo 2).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hasan and Kane, 2010
- Not checked yetcites Hasan and Moore, 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A number of efficient interpolation schemes, such as the method implemented in the BoltzTraP package (Madsen and Singh, 2006), have been developed for this purpose, but they are still prone to numerical instabilities near band degeneracies (Uehara and Tse, 2000).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Madsen and Singh, 2006
- Not checked yetcites Uehara and Tse, 2000
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“These pioneering firstprinciples calculations revealed that in ferromagnetic metals the Berry curvature displays strong and rapid variations in k -space (Fig. 32).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yao et al., 2004
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a result, an ultradense BZ mesh containing millions of k -points is often needed in order to converge the calculation.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recalling that F n k = ∇ k × A n k [Eq. (96)] and using Stokes' theorem, Eq. (110) for the AHC can be recast in terms of the Berry phases of Fermi loops on planar slices of the Fermi surface.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This approach has been implemented by Wang et al. (2007), using Wannier interpolation to sample efficiently the orbits with the very high density required near band-crossings.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wang et al. (2007)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both the k -space distribution of the Berry curvature and the integrated AHC were found to be in excellent agreement with the sum-over-states calculation of Yao et al. (2004).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wang et al., 2006
- Not checked yetcites Yao et al., 2004
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Such instabilities can be avoided by using a tight-binding parametrization to fit the first-principles band structure (Mazin et al. , 2000; Schulz et al. , 1992).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mazin et al., 2000
- Not checked yetcites Schulz et al., 1992
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Nevertheless, the Berry phase obtained by integrating over a closed loop in k -space, ϕ n = ∮ A n k · d l , is gauge-invariant (Xiao et al. , 2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Xiao et al. , 2010
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Its localization in real-space ensures that Eq. (122) smoothly interpolates g W in the electron and phonon momenta.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second category includes methods in which WFs are used to identify and focus on a desired, physically relevant subspace of the electronic degrees of freedom that is singled out ('downfolded') for further detailed analysis or special treatment with a more accurate level of electronic structure theory”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The matrix element for scattering an electron from state ψ n k to state ψ m, k + q while absorbing a phonon q ν is proportional to the electron-phonon vertex”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The cost of evaluating Eq. (116) from first-principles over a large number of ( k , q )-points is quite high, however, and this has placed a serious limitation on the scope and accuracy of first-principles techniques for electron-phonon problems.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is possible because (a) WFs and bands are related by unitary transformations, and (b) WFs are sufficiently localized that any resulting tightbinding representation may be truncated with little loss of accuracy.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first category includes methods in which WFs are used to go up in the length scale of the simulations, using the results of electronic-structure calculations on small systems in order to construct accurate models of larger, often meso-scale, systems.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Expressing the Hamiltonian H of the system in terms of a localized, real-space basis set enables it to be partitioned without ambiguity into sub-matrices that correspond to the individual subsystems.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An issue that arises when combining matrix elements from more than one DFT calculation into a single tightbinding Hamiltonian is that a common reference potential must be defined.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Such an approach has been applied to complex systems containing tens of thousands of atoms (Cantele et al. , 2009; Lee and Marzari, 2006; Li and Marzari, 2011; Li et al. , 2011; Shelley and Mostofi, 2011; Shelley et al. , 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cantele et al. , 2009
- Not checked yetcites Lee and Marzari, 2006
- Not checked yetcites Li and Marzari, 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Knowledge of the finite Hamiltonian sub-matrices in Eq. (126), therefore, is sufficient to calculate the conductance of the open leadconductor-lead system given by Eq. (124).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“As for the surface Green's functions g { L,R } of the semiinfinite leads, it is well-known that any solid (or surface) can be viewed as an infinite (semi-infinite in the case of surfaces) stack of principal layers with nearest-neighbor interactions (Lee and Joannopoulos, 1981).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee and Joannopoulos, 1981
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Truncating the matrix elements of the Hamiltonian in this way incurs a small error which is systematically controlled by increasing the size of the PL.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For many strongly-correlated electron problems, the essential physics of the system can be explained by considering only a subset of the electronic states.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“and thus greatly reduces self-interaction errors (Kulik et al. , 2006; Mori-S´ anchez et al. , 2008; Perdew and Zunger, 1981).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kulik et al., 2006
- Not checked yetcites Mori-Sánchez et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Perdew and Zunger, 1981
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The localized nature of MLWFs in real-space makes them a natural and appealing choice of basis for electronic structure calculations as the sparsity exhibited by operators that are represented in a localized basis may be exploited in order to achieve computational efficiencies and improved scaling of numerical algorithms with respect to system size.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) calculations (Foulkes et al. , 2001), a significant computational effort is expended in evaluating the Slater determinant for a given electronic configuration of N electrons. These Slater determinants are usually constructed from a set of extended single-particle states, obtained from, e.g., a DFT or Hartree-Fock calculation, represented in a basis set of, e.g.,”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Foulkes et al. , 2001
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“DFT+ U effectively corrects for the lack of piecewise linearity in approximate energy functionals (Cococcioni and de Gironcoli, 2005; Perdew et al. , 1982)”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cococcioni and de Gironcoli, 2005
- Not checked yetcites Perdew et al., 1982
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“functionals that aim to correct directly for some effects of self-interaction -such as the Perdew-Zunger correction (Perdew and Zunger, 1981) or Koopmans-compliant functionals (Dabo et al. , 2010) - can lead naturally in a periodic system to Wannier-like localized orbitals that minimize the total energy (Park et al. , 2011; Stengel and Spaldin, 2008)”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Perdew and Zunger, 1981
- Not checked yetcites Dabo et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Park et al., 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“from which we conclude that the LWFs do indeed correspond to individual atomic displacements δ RR ′ δ ss ′ and, furthermore, that the required unitary transformation is the matrix of eigenvectors [ e q ] µν .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In fact, MLWFs have been successfully used as Hubbard projectors (Anisimov et al. , 2007; Fabris et al. , 2005; Miyake and Aryasetiawan, 2008)”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Anisimov et al., 2007
- Not checked yetcites Fabris et al., 2005
- Not checked yetcites Miyake and Aryasetiawan, 2008
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although of great formal importance for justifying the existence of a suitable localized basis, and hence the tight-binding approach, the non-uniqueness of the transformation between Bloch states and Wannier functions caused difficulties.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“By analogy with the electronic case, Kohn (1973) first showed (for isolated phonon branches in one dimension) that a similar approach could be used for constructing a localized orthonormal basis for lattice vibrations that span the same space as the delocalized normal modes.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kohn (1973)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“As noted by Kohn (1973), the proof of exponential localization of LWFs follows the same reasoning as for electronic Wannier functions (Sec. II.G).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kohn (1973)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Leung (1993) first suggested that transforming to a basis of Wannier functions localized in real space would be advantageous for computational efficiency, especially when dealing with defects in photonic crystals which, using conventional methods, require very large supercells for convergence.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Leung (1993)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Finally, as first pointed out by Kohn (1973), and subsequently by Giustino et al. (2007a), maximally-localized lattice Wannier functions correspond to displacements of individual atoms.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kohn (1973)
- Not checked yetcites Giustino et al. (2007a)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“As shown, for example, by Alfimov et al. (2002), a basis of Wannier functions, localized to each site α of the optical lattice, may be used to expand the condensate wavefunction,”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Alfimov et al. (2002)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“it has been incorporated as a feature into a large number of modern first-principles electronic-structure code packages including Quantum ESPRESSO (Giannozzi et al. , 2009), Abinit (Gonze et al. , 2009), FLEUR (Freimuth et al. , 2008), WIEN2k (Kuneˇ s et al. , 2010; Schwarz et al. , 2002), Siesta (Koryt´ ar et al. , 2010; Soler et al. , 2002), and VASP (Franchini et al. , 2011; Kresse and Furthm¨”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Giannozzi et al., 2009
- Not checked yetcites Gonze et al., 2009
- Not checked yetcites Kresse and Furthmuller, 1996
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“our emphasis has been on the one of Marzari and Vanderbilt (1997), essentially the generalization of the approach of Foster and Boys (Boys, 1960, 1966; Foster and Boys, 1960a,b) to periodic systems, in which the gauge freedom is resolved by minimizing the sum of the quadratic spreads of the WFs.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Marzari and Vanderbilt (1997)
- Not checked yetcites Boys, 1960, 1966
- Not checked yetcites Foster and Boys, 1960a,b
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 132
- Probably not a substantial claim. 119
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Inspection of the resulting MLWFs confirms their atomic d -like character. They are also significantly more localized than the ones obtained by projection and the corresponding disentangled bands are somewhat better behaved, displaying less spurious oscillations in the hybridization regions.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We show as red circles in Fig. 5 the results obtained by forcing the entire valence manifold to be preserved, leading to a set of eight projected bands that reproduce exactly the four valence bands, and follow quite closely the four low-lying conduction bands.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Projection techniques can work very well, and an application of this approach to graphene is shown in Fig. 6, where the π/π ⋆ manifold is disentangled with great accuracy by a simple projection onto atomic p z orbitals, or the entire occupied manifold together with π/π ⋆ manifold is obtained by projection onto atomic p z and sp 2 orbitals (one every other atom, for the case of the sp 2 orbitals”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The red circles show the results obtained using the iterative scheme to extract an optimally-smooth fivedimensional manifold. The maximal 'global smoothness of connection' is achieved by keeping the five d -like states and excluding the s -like state. This happens because the smoothness criterion embodied by Eqs. (48) and (49) implies that the orbital character is preserved as much as possible”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Goedecker et al. (2002) have predicted - entirely from first-principles - the existence of a new fourfold-coordinated defect that is stable inside the Si lattice (see Fig. 18).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Goedecker et al., 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In their study of β -rhombohedral boron, Ogitsu et al. (2009) were able to identify and study the relation between two-center and three-center bonds and boron vacancies, identifying the most electron-deficient bonds as the most chemically active.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ogitsu et al., 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, Cangiani et al. (2004) discussed the case of TiO 2 polytypes, where bonding MLWFs associated with the O 2 s/ 2 p valence manifold are seen to be similar in the rutile and anatase form, with the third polytype (brookite) an average between the two (Posternak et al. , 2006).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cangiani et al., 2004
- Not checked yetcites Posternak et al., 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This defect had not been considered before, but displays by far the lowest formation energy - at the DFT level - among all native defects in silicon.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Goedecker et al., 2002
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While in the classical ionic picture of perovskites the B-cation (here Ti) is completely ionized in a 4+ state, the covalent nature of the bond becomes clearly apparent here, with the MLWFs showing a clear hybridization in the form of mixed p -d orbitals.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The MLWFs also become significantly more delocalized at that pressure, hinting at a metallization transition similar to the one that occurs in Si in going from the diamond to the β -tin structure.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Martonak et al., 2000
- Not checked yetcites Martonak et al., 2001
- Not checked yetcites Molteni et al., 2001
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Inspection of the relevant 'defective' MLWFs reveals that their spreads actually remain very close to those typical of crystalline silicon, and that the WFCs remain equally shared between the atoms in a typical covalent arrangement.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Goedecker et al., 2002
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For the case of the silicon vacancy, MLWFs have been studied for all the charge states by (Corsetti and Mostofi, 2011), validating the canonical Watkins model (Watkins and Messmer, 1974).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Corsetti and Mostofi, 2011
- Not checked yetcites Watkins and Messmer, 1974
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For a given spatial cutoff on the tight-binding Hamiltonian constructed from these MLWFs, it is found that the former give a qualitatively much better description of the DFT band structure than the latter, despite the counter-intuitive result that the 'off-bond' MLWFs are slightly more localized.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Corsetti, 2012
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the Ziegler-Natta reaction we have an interconversion of a double carbon bond into a single bond, and a characteristic agostic interaction between the C-H bond and the activated metal center. Both become immediately visible once the WFCs are monitored, greatly aiding the interpretation of the complex chemical pathways.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boero et al., 2000b
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, Zhong et al. (1994) reported values of +7 . 2 e for Ti displacements, and -5 . 7 e for O displacements along the Ti-O-Ti chains.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zhong et al., 1994
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Surprisingly, they find that the magnitude of this dipole vector is typically only about 2.1 D in liquid water, much less than the value obtained from the WF analysis.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pasquarello and Resta, 2003
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Using this definition, these authors found that the water molecule dipole is somewhat broadly distributed, but has an average value of about 3.0 D, about 60% higher than in the gas phase.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Silvestrelli and Parrinello, 1999a
- Not checked yetcites Silvestrelli and Parrinello, 1999b
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Interestingly, it was found that the interstitial contribution - defined as the difference between the total orbital magnetization, Eq. (94), and the muffin-tin result - is not always negligible. In bcc Fe, for example, it amounts to more than 30% of the spontaneous orbital magnetization, and its inclusion improves the agreement with gyromagnetic measurements.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ceresoli et al., 2010a
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The spin contribution is typically dominant over the orbital one (e.g., by a factor of 10 or more in simple ferromagnets such as Fe, Ni and Co (Ceresoli et al. , 2010a)), but the orbital component is also of interest”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ceresoli et al., 2010a
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While no examples are known to occur in nature, tight-binding models exhibiting such a behavior are not hard to construct (Haldane, 1988).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Haldane, 1988
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The actual implementation of Wannier's vision in the context of first-principles electronic-structure calculations, such as those carried out in the Kohn-Sham framework of density-functional theory (Kohn and Sham, 1965), has instead been slower to unfold.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kohn and Sham, 1965
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As such, they have become an established tool in the post-processing of electronicstructure calculations.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In a related development, Souza et al. (2001) generalized the method to handle the case in which one wants to construct a set of WFs that spans a subspace containing, e.g., the partially occupied bands of a metal.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Souza et al., 2001
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is a consequence of the phase indeterminacy that Bloch orbitals ψ n k have at every wavevector k - or, more generally, the 'gauge' indeterminacy associated with the freedom to apply any arbitrary unitary transformation to the occupied Bloch states at each k .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of broader interest to the entire condensed matter community is the use of WFs in the construction of model Hamiltonians for, e.g., correlated-electron and magnetic systems.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The history is rather different in the chemistry literature, where 'localized molecular orbitals' (LMO's) (Boys, 1960, 1966; Edmiston and Ruedenberg, 1963; Foster and Boys, 1960a,b) have played a significant role in computational chemistry since its early days.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boys, 1960, 1966
- Not checked yetcites Edmiston and Ruedenberg, 1963
- Not checked yetcites Foster and Boys, 1960a,b
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“WFs thus provide an attractive option for representing the space spanned by a Bloch band in a crystal, being localized while still carrying the same information contained in the Bloch functions.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since Bloch functions at different k have different envelope functions e i k · r , one can expect to be able to build a localized 'wave packet' by superposing Bloch functions of different k .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The band of interest is isolated, remaining separated by a gap from the bands below and above at all k.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The independent-particle approximation is valid for describing the electronic ground state.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These developments touched off a transformational shift in which the computational electronic-structure community started constructing maximally-localized WFs (MLWFs) explicitly and using these for different purposes.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, MLWF's have been used in the theoretical analysis of phonons, photonic crystals, cold atom lattices, and the local dielectric responses of insulators.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Electronic structure calculations are often carried out using periodic boundary conditions.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The approach is similar in spirit to the construction of LMO's in chemistry”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the case of periodic system, these one-particle orbitals are normally taken to be the Bloch functions ψ n k ( r ) that are labeled, according to Bloch's theorem, by a crystal momentum k lying inside the Brillouin zone and a band index n .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The independent-particle approximation is valid for describing the electronic ground state.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In particular, to arrive at the Wannier representation (des Cloizeaux, 1963; Kohn, 1959; Wannier, 1937), one carries out a unitary transformation from the Bloch functions to a set of localized 'Wannier functions' (WFs) labeled by a cell index R and a band-like index n , such that in a crystal the WFs at different R are translational images of one another.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites des Cloizeaux, 1963
- Not checked yetcites Kohn, 1959
- Not checked yetcites Wannier, 1937
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The independent-particle approximation is valid for describing the electronic ground state.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The one-particle effective Hamiltonian H then commutes with the lattice-translation operator T R , allowing one to choose as common eigenstates the Bloch orbitals | ψ n k 〉 :”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The independent-particle approximation is valid for describing the electronic ground state.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unlike Bloch functions, WFs are not eigenstates of the Hamiltonian; in selecting them, one trades off localization in energy for localization in space.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The independent-particle approximation is valid for describing the electronic ground state.
In the paper
“an alternative representation in terms of localized 'Wannier functions' was introduced by Gregory Wannier in 1937.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wannier, 1937
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The connection between the Bloch and Wannier representations is realized by families of transformations in a continuous space of unitary matrices, carrying a large degree of arbitrariness.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An alternative use of WFs as localized, transferable building blocks has taken place in the theory of ballistic (Landauer) transport, where Green's functions and self-energies can be constructed effectively in a Wannier basis”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This connection is embodied in the microscopic modern theory of polarization, alluded to above, and has led to important advances in the characterization and understanding of dielectric response and polarization in materials.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The existence of exponentially localized WFs - i.e., WFs whose tails decay exponentially fast - is a famous problem in the band theory of solids, with close ties to the general properties of the insulating state (Kohn, 1964).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kohn, 1964
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is typical of Fourier transforms: the smoother the reciprocal-space object, the more localized the resulting real-space object, and vice versa.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These false minima either correspond to the formation of topological defects (e.g., 'vortices') in an otherwise smooth gauge field in discrete k space, or they can arise when the branch cuts for the complex logarithms in Eq. (28) and Eq. (29) are inconsistent, i.e., when at any given k -point the contributions from different b -vectors differ by random amounts of 2 π in the logarithm.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This behavior derives from the finitedifference representation of the invariant part Ω I of the localization functional (essentially, a second derivative); while Ω I does not enter into the localization procedure, it does contribute to the spread, and in fact usually represents the largest term.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Panati (2007) had demonstrated that this condition ensures the possibility of carrying out the gauge transformation of Eq. (8) in such a way that the resulting cell-periodic states | ˜ u n k 〉 are analytic functions of k across the entire BZ; 7 this in turn implies the exponential falloff of the WFs given by Eq. (10).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Panati (2007)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most straightforward way to avoid local minima altogether is to initialize the minimization procedure with a gauge choice that is already fairly smooth.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that in the limit of a single k point the distinction between Bloch orbitals and WFs becomes irrelevant, since no Fourier transform from k to R is involved in the transformation Eq. (10); rather, we want to find the optimal unitary matrix that rotates the ground-state selfconsistent orbitals into their maximally localized representation, making this problem exactly equivalent to the one of”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Such a construction has proved useful for a variety of purposes, from verifying numerically exponential localization in 1 dimension, to treating electric polarization or applied electric fields along a specific spatial direction (Giustino and Pasquarello, 2005; Giustino et al. , 2003; Murray and Vanderbilt, 2009; Stengel and Spaldin, 2006a; Wu et al. , 2006) or for analyzing aspects of topological”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Giustino and Pasquarello, 2005
- Not checked yetcites Giustino et al., 2003
- Not checked yetcites Murray and Vanderbilt, 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Wannier centers and the general shape of the MLWFs often converge rapidly as the cell size is increased, but even for the ideal case of an isolated molecule, the total spread Ω often displays much slower convergence.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The localization procedure can then be entirely recast in real space, and corresponds exactly to determining Foster-Boys localized orbitals.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“and the subsequent removal of the requirement of inversion symmetry in the latter case by Nenciu (1983).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nenciu (1983)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“A simple yet often effective approach for constructing a smooth gauge in k , and a corresponding set of welllocalized WFs, is by projection - an approach that finds its roots in the analysis of des Cloizeaux (1964a).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites des Cloizeaux (1964a)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this approach, the Brillouin zone is considered to be sufficiently small that integrations over k -vectors can be approximated with a single k -point (usually at the Γ point, i.e., the origin in reciprocal space).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It can be shown that not only ˜ Ω but also Ω I is positive definite , and moreover that Ω I is gauge-invariant , i.e., invariant under any arbitrary unitary transformation (10) of the Bloch orbitals (Marzari and Vanderbilt, 1997).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Marzari and Vanderbilt, 1997
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interestingly, it should also be mentioned that the local minima alluded to in the previous subsection are typically not found when using Γ sampling in large supercells.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In such cases, therefore, the extra unitary mixing expressed in Eq. (8) is mandatory, even if it may be optional in the case of a set of discrete bands that do not touch anywhere in the BZ.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Other milestones include the work of des Cloizeaux (1964b), who established the exponential localization in 1D crystals without inversion symmetry and in the centrosymmetric 3D case”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites des Cloizeaux (1964b)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“proofs of exponential localization for the Wannier transform were obtained over the years only for limited cases, starting with the work of Kohn (1959), who considered a one-dimensional crystal with inversion symmetry.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kohn (1959)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Heuristically, it is also found that the WFs corresponding to these local minima are intrinsically complex, while they are found to be real, a part from a single complex phase, at the desired global minimum (provided of course that the calculations do not include spin-orbit coupling).”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The calculations do not include spin-orbit coupling.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“since we would not get well-localized WFs on the left-hand side otherwise.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The asymptotic behavior of WFs was further clarified by He and Vanderbilt (2001), who found that the exponential decay is modulated by a power law.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites He and Vanderbilt (2001)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, once the M ( k , b ) mn have been calculated, no further interaction with the electronic-structure code that calculated the ground state wavefunctions is necessary - making the entire Wannierization procedure a code-independent post-processing step 5 .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Instead, a straightforward projection approach ensures the similarity between the WF in the defect (supercell) and in the pristine (primitive cell) calculations, and this has been exploited to develop a scheme to unfold the band-structure of disordered supercells into the Brillouin zone of the underlying primitive cell, allowing a direct comparison with angular resolved photoemission spectroscopy”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ku et al., 2010
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“An extreme example is CO 2 (Brown et al. , 1977). In agreement with the O=C=O Lewis picture, ER gives two lone pairs on each oxygen and two τ orbitals between each carbon and oxygen. In contrast, the FB scheme gives a single lone pair on each oxygen and three highly polarized τ orbitals between the carbon and each oxygen, as shown in Fig. 10.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brown et al., 1977
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is worth noting that the Γ-point formulation (Sec. II.F.2) appears to be less affected by these problems.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The stationarity condition δ Ω I ( { ˜ u n k } ) = 0, subject to orthonormality constraints, is equivalent to solving the set of eigenvalue equations”
- Also stated in: § 3. Iterative minimization of Ω I · p. 15 · boosted
“Clearly these equations, one for each k -point, are coupled, so that the problem has to be solved selfconsistently throughout the Brillouin zone.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 3. Iterative minimization of Ω I · p. 15 · boosted
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Here again, this approach may give useful physical and chemical intuition, but the one-electron quasiparticle wavefunctions do not have the physical interpretation of occupied states, and charge densities and other ground-state properties cannot be computed quantitatively from them.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hamann and Vanderbilt (2009)
- Not checked yetcites Aryasetiawan and Gunnarsson, 1998
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“What they all have in common is that the resulting localized molecular orbitals (LMOs) φ i ( r ) can be expressed as linear combinations of a set of molecular eigenstates ψ i ( r ) (the 'canonical' MOs), typically chosen to be the occupied ones,”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One important difference is that the resulting states are not guaranteed to be individually smooth, and the minimization of Ω I must therefore be followed by a gauge-selection step, which is in every way identical to the one described earlier for isolated groups of bands.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Problems associated with reaching local minima of the spread functional, and with obtaining Wannier functions that are not real-valued, are more pronounced in the case of entangled bands.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While exponential localization has not been proven, both numerical evidence and the analogy with the isolated composite case suggest this might be the case.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The goal here is to maximize the density overlap of the orbitals (von Niessen, 1972)”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites von Niessen, 1972
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As indicated in Eq. (56), all of these schemes amount to unitary transformations among the canonical MOs and, as such, they give rise to representations of the electronic structure of the system that are equivalent to that provided by the original set of eigenstates.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since these are small matrices, each step of the iterative procedure is computationally inexpensive.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“The idea is to maximize the sum of the squares of the Mulliken atomic charges (Mulliken, 1955).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mulliken, 1955
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Empirical evidence and experience suggests that localized Wannier functions can be readily constructed also in the case of an entangled manifold of bands: Even for metals, smooth manifolds can be disentangled and 'wannierized' to give MLWFs.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we have seen, WFs are inherently non-unique and, in practice, some strategy is needed to determine the gauge.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Projection methods have been extensively used to study strongly-correlated systems (Anisimov et al. , 2005; Berlijn et al. , 2011; Ku et al. , 2002), in particular to identify a 'correlated subspace' for LDA+U or DMFT calculations, as will be discussed in more detail in Sec. VII.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Anisimov et al., 2005
- Not checked yetcites Berlijn et al., 2011
- Not checked yetcites Ku et al., 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“As illustrated in Fig. 9, they showed that by minimizing Ω = Ω I + ˜ Ω for different choices of J , one can find an optimal J such that the resulting 'partially-occupied' Wannier functions are most localized (provided enough bands are used to capture the bonding and anti-bonding combinations of those atomiclike WFs).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Thygesen et al. (2005a,b)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The latter approach is conceptually more satisfactory, as it does not depend on a particular choice of trial orbitals. However, it still does not uniquely solve the problem of choosing a gauge, as different localization criteria are possible and there is, a priori , no reason to choose one over another.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MLWFs, which may be thought of as the solid-state equivalent of FB orbitals, have been widely used to examine chemical bonding, as will be discussed in detail in Sec. IV.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is now evident that T k , b measures the degree of mismatch (or 'spillage') between the neighboring Bloch subspaces at k and k + b , vanishing when they are identical, and that Ω I provides a BZ average of the local subspace mismatch.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since n ( r , r ′ ) is periodic in the sense of n ( r + R , r ′ + R ) = n ( r , r ′ ), its eigenvectors the so-called 'natural orbitals' - have the form of Bloch functions carrying a label n, k . If the insulator is essentially a correlated version of a band insulator having J bands, then at each k there will typically be J occupation eigenvalues ν n k that are close to unity, as well as some”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When applied to benzene, both schemes give alternating σ and τ orbitals. Trivially, there are two equivalent sets of these orbitals, reminiscent of the two Kekul´ e structures for benzene. In contrast to the FB and ER schemes, PM provides a clear separation of σ and π orbitals. For example, in benzene PM gives a framework of six σ orbitals and three π orbitals around the ring.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In some situations the FB and ER orbitals have been found to be quite different. This has been observed when the bonding in a molecule can be represented as two distinct resonant structures. The ER scheme generally gives orbitals corresponding to one of the possible structures, whilst the FB orbitals correspond a hybrid of the structures.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The above procedure achieves simultaneously the two goals of subspace selection and gauge selection, although neither of them is performed optimally.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In many cases all three approaches lead to similar localized orbitals which agree with the simple Lewis picture of bonding. A notable exception is for systems that exhibit both σ and π bonding.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While MLWFs for extended systems have been generated for the most part by minimizing the sum of quadratic spreads, Eq. (17), a variety of other localization criteria have been used over the years for molecular systems.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The ER scheme has not been extensively examined, an isolated exception being the work of Miyake and Aryasetiawan (2008) who proposed a method to maximize the Coulomb self-interaction of the orbitals in periodic systems (see also Sec. VII.B.1). They examined a range of bulk transition metals and SrVO 3 and in each case found that the resulting WFs were essentially identical to MLWFs.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Miyake and Aryasetiawan (2008)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, while such an approach may provide useful qualitative information, it cannot provide the basis for any exact theory. For example, the charge density, or expectation value of any other one-particle operator, obtained by tracing over these WFs will not match their exact many-body counterparts.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Koch and Goedecker (2001)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This is essentially the same as the Marzari-Vanderbilt criterion of minimizing the sum of the quadratic spreads, except that the sum runs over the orbitals in the molecule, rather than in one crystal cell,”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boys, 1960, 1966
- Not checked yetcites Foster and Boys, 1960a
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“From a computational point of view, the ER approach is more demanding (it scales as J 4 versus J 2 for FB), but recently more efficient implementations have been developed (Subotnik et al. , 2007).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Subotnik et al., 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The resulting many-body WF is a complex function of 3 M electron coordinates, and as such it is unwieldy to use in practice. However, it is closely related to Kohn's theory of the insulating state (Kohn, 1964), and in principle it can be used to formulate many-body versions of the theory of electric polarization and related quantities, as shall be mentioned in Sec. V.A.4.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kohn, 1964
- Not checked yetcites Souza et al. (2000)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As a final comment, we mention that in the case of degeneracies or quasi degeneracies in the spreads of orbitals centered on the same site, the localization algorithm will perform rather arbitrary mixing of these (as can be the case, e.g., for the d or f electrons of a transition-metal ion, or for its t 2 g or e g groups). A solution to this problem is to diagonalize an operator with the desired”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Posternak et al. (2002)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Here localization is achieved by maximizing the Coulomb selfinteraction of the orbitals (Edmiston and Ruedenberg, 1963)”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Edmiston and Ruedenberg, 1963
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The concept of WFs is closely tied to the framework of single-particle Hamiltonians. Only in this case can we define J occupied single-particle Bloch functions at each wavevector k and treat all J of them on an equal footing, allowing for invariance with respect to unitary mixing among them.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As such, they are often very useful for extracting chemical trends and for allowing for statistics to be gathered on the nature of bonds (e.g covalent bonds vs. lone pairs), be it in the presence of structural complexity, as is the case of an amorphous solid, or following the intrinsic dynamics of a liquid or an unfolding chemical reaction.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is usually required that a subset of N ≤ J of the original eigenstates are identically preserved ('frozen in') in the disentangled subspace, in which case the optimization is performed with respect to the remaining J -N states φ n . J must be of sufficient size to capture all of the antibonding character of the AOs.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unlike WFs, however, the quasiatomic orbitals form a nonorthogonal basis of atom-centered functions, each with specified angular character. Their radial part, and hence their detailed local shape, depends on the bonding environment.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Lu et al. (2004) proposed a more optimized procedure, based on maximizing the sum-over-square similarity measure 8”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lu et al. (2004)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Many of these methods also make use of nonorthogonal localized orbitals, referred to as 'support functions' (Hern´ andez and Gillan, 1995) or 'non-orthogonal generalized Wannier functions' (NGWFs) (Skylaris et al. , 2002), in contrast to canonical WFs, which are orthogonal.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hernández and Gillan, 1995
- Not checked yetcites Skylaris et al., 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We emphasize once again that no choice of WFs, whether according to maximal localization or other criteria, can be regarded as 'more correct' than another.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In Qian et al. (2008), QOs were obtained for simple metals and semiconductors. Later applications have used the orbitals for the study of quantum transport in nano-structures (Qian et al. , 2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Qian et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Qian et al., 2010
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the same way as was described for the MarzariVanderbilt scheme of Sec. II.C, the alternative localization criteria described above can be applied in a solidstate context to isolated groups of bands.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This apparent simplification has introduced an energy dependence into the Hamiltonian. One practical way forward is to approximate this as an energy-independent Hamiltonian H eff 00 ( ε 0 ), choosing the reference energy ε 0 to be the average energy of the states of interest. This approach has been used to construct tight-binding Hamiltonians from full electronic structure calculations (Solovyev,”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Solovyev, 2004
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The maximally-localized Wannier functions (MLWFs) provide the natural generalization of this concept to the case of extended or solidstate systems.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Finally, localized orbitals can embody the chemical concept of transferable functional groups, and thus be used to construct a good approximation for the electronic-structure of complex systems starting from the orbitals for the different fragments (Benoit et al. , 2001; Hierse and Stechel, 1994; Lee et al. , 2005), as will be discussed in Section VII.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Benoit et al., 2001
- Not checked yetcites Hierse and Stechel, 1994
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al., 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This arbitrariness seems less common in extended system, and often some of the most chemically meaningful information comes from the statistics of bonds as obtained in large-scale simulations, or in long first-principles molecular dynamics runs.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In practice, linear-scaling methods target large systems, which means that Γ-point only sampling of the BZ is usually sufficient.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because WFs are intrinsically gauge-dependent, it is impossible, even in principle, to determine the WFs experimentally.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By the same token, certain properties obtained from the WFs, such as the dipole moments of molecules in condensed phases (see Sec. V.B.3), must be interpreted with caution.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One is often interested in the more general situation where the bands of interest are not isolated. The challenge then is to generate a 'disentangled' set of J localized WFs starting from some larger set of bands.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“An alternative scheme for obtaining a minimal basis representation is the perturbation approach introduced by L¨ owdin (1951).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Löwdin (1951)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A form of L¨ owdin partitioning has been widely used in connection with the linear-muffin-tin-orbital (LMTO) method, particularly in its most recent formulation, the N th -order muffin-tin-orbital (NMTO) approach (Andersen and Saha-Dasgupta, 2000; Zurek et al. , 2005).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Andersen and Saha-Dasgupta, 2000
- Not checked yetcites Zurek et al., 2005
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Taking into account the energy dependence, this reduced set of orbitals spans the same space as the original full set of orbitals, and can be seen to be the original orbitals of the active set dressed by an energy-dependent linear combination of orbitals from the passive set.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zurek et al., 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This manifests itself in the exponential localization of the WFs in insulators (discussed in Sec. II.G) and, more generally, in the localization properties of the single-particle density matrix”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The quasiatomic orbitals (QOs) scheme (Chan et al. , 2007; Lu et al. , 2004; Qian et al. , 2008) is a projectionbased approach that has the aim of extracting a minimal tight-binding basis from an initial first-principles calculation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chan et al., 2007
- Not checked yetcites Lu et al., 2004
- Not checked yetcites Qian et al., 2008
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When using WFs to interpret the nature of chemical bonds, as in Sec. IV, the results may depend to some degree on the choice of WF construction method, and the optimal choice may in the end be a matter of taste.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general the angular dependence of the resulting QOs will no longer that of pure spherical harmonics, but only approximately so.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Instead, just the knowledge of the positions of the WFCs and their spreads can capture most of the chemistry in the system and can identify the defects present.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Such hybridization is at the origin of the ferroelectric instability, as argued by Posternak et al. (1994).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Posternak et al., 1994
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Still, it is easy to see how MLWFs can make the connection between atomic constituents and solid-state bands, representing a formal derivation of 'atoms in solids.'”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One can then construct either a minimal basis of one p z MLWF per carbon, if interested only in the π/π ⋆ manifold around the Fermi energy, or a slightly larger set with an additional MLWF per covalent bond, if interested in describing both the partially occupied π/π ⋆ and the fully occupied σ manifolds.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This has been explored further by AbuFarsakh and Qteish (2007), to introduce a formal definition of electronegativity, or rather of a bond-ionicity scale, based on the deviation of WFCs from their geometrical bond centers.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites AbuFarsakh and Qteish, 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Following this definition, one can provide a more meaningful definition of atomic coordination number, argue for the presence (or absence) of bonds in defective configurations, and propose specific electronic signatures for identifying different defects (Silvestrelli et al. , 1998).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Silvestrelli et al., 1998
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Rather than reflecting a 'true' chemical entity, these represent linear combinations of sp 3 orbitals that interfere constructively at the interstitial sites, thus providing the additional variational freedom needed to describe the entire occupied space.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Souza et al., 2001
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It should be stressed that a 'chemical' interpretation of the MLWFs is most appropriate when they are formed from a unitary transformation of the occupied subspace.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The reason is that the 'on-bond' MLWFs have a single dominant nearest neighbor interaction along a bond, whereas for the 'off-bond' MLWFs there are a larger number of weaker nearest-neighbor interactions that are not directed along the bonds (Corsetti, 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Corsetti, 2012
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is worth mentioning that these qualitative features of Wannier functions tend to be robust, and often independent of the details of the method used to obtained them - maximally localized or not.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For the case of amorphous silicon, for example, the existence of a bond between two ions can be defined by their sharing a common WFC within a distance that is smaller than the first minimum of the silicon-WFC pair correlation function.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Silvestrelli et al., 1998
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“These considerations suggest that the electronic configuration is locally almost indistinguishable from that of the perfect lattice, making this defect difficult to detect with standard electronic probes.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Goedecker et al., 2002
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Once conduction bands are included via the disentanglement procedure, results depend on both the target dimensions of the disentangled manifold and on the states considered in the procedure (e.g., the 'outer window').”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results given in this section are valid for any set of localized WFs; maximally localized ones do not play any special role.”
- Also stated in: § B. Local polar properties and dielectric response · p. 30 · plain
“We emphasize again that MLWFs have no privileged role in Eq. (89); the expression remains correct for any WFs that are sufficiently well localized that the centers r n are well defined.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § B. Local polar properties and dielectric response · p. 30 · plain
In the paper
“Such approaches are particularly useful when combined with molecular-dynamics simulations, and most applications have taken place within the framework first proposed by Car and Parrinello (Car and Parrinello, 1985).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Car and Parrinello, 1985
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of course, such a definition in terms of the dipole of the molecular WF-center configuration remains heuristic at some level.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics is particularly suited to the study of liquid systems, and applications have been numerous in all areas of physical chemistry.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In these materials, partially covalent bonding associated with hybridization between O 2 p and Ti 3 d states plays a crucial role in stabilizing the ferroelectric state and generating anomalous dynamical effective charges (Posternak et al. , 1994; Zhong et al. , 1994).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Posternak et al., 1994
- Not checked yetcites Zhong et al., 1994
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a result, the center of charge of the WF shifts upward, and since electrons carry negative charge, this results in a negative anomalous contribution to the Z ∗ of the oxygen atom.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the O atom moves upward relative to the geometric center of the two neighboring Ti atoms as shown in Fig. 22(b), as it does in ferroelectrically distorted BaTiO 3 , the hybridization strengthens for the upper O-Ti bond and weakens for the lower one, endowing the WF with more Ti 3 d character on the top than on the bottom.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such efforts and the implementation in widely-available computer codes have given rise to an extensive literature dedicated to understanding and monitoring the nature of bonding in complex and realistic systems under varying thermodynamical conditions or during a chemical reaction.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In practice one wants to solve for a longlived resonance in which the charge density and other properties of the insulator remain periodic, corresponding to what is meant experimentally by an insulator in a finite field.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Since the extraction of Wannier centers in 1D is rather trivial, even in the multiband case (Bhattacharjee and Waghmare, 2005; Marzari and Vanderbilt, 1997; Sgiarovello et al. , 2001), it is not difficult to construct a 'Wannier center band structure' ¯ z ( k x , k y ), and use the planar-averaged values to assign dipole moments to layers.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bhattacharjee and Waghmare, 2005
- Not checked yetcites Marzari and Vanderbilt, 1997
- Not checked yetcites Sgiarovello et al., 2001
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While 〈 Ψ | ˆ x | Ψ 〉 is ill-defined in the extended many-body ground state | Ψ 〉 , the matrix element 〈 Ψ | ˆ X | Ψ 〉 is welldefined and can be used to obtain the electric polarization, up to the usual quantum.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ortiz and Martin, 1994
- Not checked yetcites Resta, 1998
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, while the Wannier charge centers are related to the mean value of P under quantum fluctuations, their invariant quadratic spread Ω I is related to the corresponding variance of P .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, this local measure of the dipole does not appear to be experimentally measurable even in principle, and clearly the use of one of the alternative measures of maximal localization discussed in Sec. III.A would give rise to slightly different values.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Correspondingly, it can be shown that an arbitrary change of gauge can shift individual Wannier centers r n in arbitrary ways, except that the sum ∑ n r n is guaranteed to remain invariant (modulo a lattice vector).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The theory of crystalline insulators in finite electric field E is a subtle one; the electric potential -E · r does not obey the conditions of Bloch's theorem, and moreover is unbounded from below, so that there is no well-defined ground state.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Using such approaches, it is possible to compute the dynamical dipole-dipole correlations of polar liquids and compare the results with experimental infrared absorption spectra.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kirchner, 2007
- Not checked yetcites Tse, 2002
- Not checked yetcites Tuckerman, 2002
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the dipole moment of an isolated H 2 O molecule is obviously well defined, a corresponding definition is not easy to arrive at in the liquid phase where molecules are in close contact with each other.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, we shall see that the use of MLWFs can provide a very useful, if heuristic, local decomposition of polar properties in a an extended system.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Resta and coworkers have defined a measure of localization (Resta, 2002, 2006; Resta and Sorella, 1999; Sgiarovello et al. , 2001) that distinguishes insulators from metals quite generally, and have shown that this localization measure reduces, in the absence of two-particle interactions or disorder, to the invariant part of the spread functional Ω I given in Eq. (20).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Resta, 2002
- Not checked yetcites Resta and Sorella, 1999
- Not checked yetcites Sgiarovello et al., 2001
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and clearly the use of one of the alternative measures of maximal localization discussed in Sec. III.A would give rise to slightly different values.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If time-reversal symmetry is preserved at the surface, Z 2 -odd materials possess topologically-protected surface states which straddle the bulk gap, crossing the Fermi level an odd number of times.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Most (i.e., 'normal') insulators are Z 2 -even, but strong spin-orbit effects can lead to the Z 2 -odd state, for which the surface-state dispersions are topologically required to display characteristic features that are amenable to experimental verification.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hasan and Kane, 2010
- Not checked yetcites Hasan and Moore, 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The calculations on Bi 2 Se 3 revealed the existence of a single Dirac cone at the Γ point as shown in Fig. 30, in agreement with ARPES measurements (Xia et al. , 2009).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Xia et al., 2009
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These surface states are doubly-degenerate at the time-reversal-invariant momenta of the surface BZ, and in the vicinity thereof they disperse linearly, forming Dirac cones.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several materials realizations of Z 2 -odd insulators have now been confirmed both theoretically and experimentally (Hasan and Kane, 2010; Hasan and Moore, 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hasan and Kane, 2010
- Not checked yetcites Hasan and Moore, 2011
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This time, however, the skin contribution does not vanish. The problem is that 〈 φ j | v | φ j 〉 is nonzero for LMOs in the skin region, and the pattern of these velocity vectors is such as to describe a current circulating around the boundary of the sample, giving a second 'itinerant circulation' contribution”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, the contribution of this band to the electric polarization of Eq. (90), and to the second term in the orbital magnetization expression of Eq. (94), are proportional to the Brillouin-zone integrals of A n k and E n k F n k , respectively.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An insulator with a non-zero value would behave like an integer quantum Hall system, but without the need for an external magnetic field; such systems are usually denoted as 'quantum anomalous Hall' (QAH) insulators.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In a ferromagnetic (or ferrimagnetic) material, the total magnetization has two components. One arises from electron spin and is proportional to the excess population of spin-up over spin-down electrons; a second corresponds to circulating orbital currents.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By virtue of the exponential localization of the WFs within the periodic supercell (see Footnote 2), the magnitude of the matrix elements 〈 0 | H | R 〉 decreases rapidly with | R | , and this exponential localization is preserved even in the case of metals, provided a smooth subspace has been disentangled.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ordinary insulators are characterized by a zero value of the invariant.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is often the case for metals, as the presence of a Fermi surface introduces sharp discontinuities in k -space.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Many of the deficiencies of the Kohn-Sham energy bands, such as the underestimation of the energy gaps of insulators and semiconductors, can be corrected using many-body perturbation theory in the form of the GW approximation (for a review, see Aryasetiawan and Gunnarsson (1998)).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aryasetiawan and Gunnarsson, 1998
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The advantage of such approach is that it does not require linear-response theory, and so it is amenable to large-scale calculations or complex exchange-correlation functionals (e.g., including Hubbard U corrections, or Hartree-Fock exchange), albeit at the cost of typically one self-consistent iteration for every nucleus considered.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the latter study the authors found that the simple scissors correction to the DFT-LDA bands is accurate near the Γ point only, and only for bands close to the highest valence and lowest conduction band.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Peelaers et al., 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Even if with this sampling the system has a pseudogap of 2eV, the metallic character of the bands is perfectly reproduced, and these are in excellent agreement with the bands calculated directly on the primitive cell by direct diagonalization of the Kohn-Sham Hamiltonian in the full plane-wave basis set (open circles).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al., 2005
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that inclusion of the spin-orbit interaction is essential for any description of orbital magnetic effects.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, Zhang et al. (2011b) found that the topological surface states are essentially the same with and without this surface correction.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zhang et al., 2011b
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While the AHC of the cubic metals Fe and Ni is fairly isotropic, that of hcp Co was found to decrease by a factor of four as the magnetization is rotated from the c -axis to the basal plane.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roman et al., 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A direct numerical differentiation of the eigenenergies calculated on a grid is cumbersome and becomes unreliable near band crossings.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As shown by Graf and Vogl (1992) and Boykin (1995), both the first and the second derivatives are easily computed within tight-binding methods, even in the presence of band degeneracies, and the same can be done in a firstprinciples context using WFs.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Graf and Vogl, 1992
- Not checked yetcites Boykin, 1995
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This so-called anomalous Hall effect occurs in ferromagnets from the combination of exchange splitting and spin-orbit interaction. For a recent review, see Nagaosa et al. (2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nagaosa et al., 2010
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“A Wannier-based calculation free from such numerical instabilities was carried out by Yates et al. (2007), who obtained carefullyconverged values for σ xy in Pd and other cubic metals.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yates et al., 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Different electron-phonon interpolation schemes have been put forth in the literature (Calandra et al. , 2010; Eiguren and Ambrosch-Draxl, 2008; Giustino et al. , 2007b)”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Calandra et al. , 2010
- Not checked yetcites Eiguren and Ambrosch-Draxl, 2008
- Not checked yetcites Giustino et al. , 2007b
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The similarity between the Wannier interpolation of energy bands and the Fourier interpolation of phonon dispersions was already noted. It suggests the possibility of interpolating the electron-phonon vertex in both the electron and the phonon momenta, once Eq. (116) has been calculated on a relatively coarse uniform ( k , q )-mesh.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As will be discussed in Sec. VIII, it is possible to view these single-atom displacements as maximally-localized 'lattice Wannier functions.'”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Ch. VI, we described the use of Wannier functions as a compact tight-binding basis that represents a given set of energy bands exactly, and that can be used to calculate a variety of properties efficiently, and with very high accuracy.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The electron-phonon interaction (Grimvall, 1981) plays a key role in a number of phenomena, from superconductivity to the resistivity of metals and the temperature dependence of the optical spectra of semiconductors.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Grimvall, 1981
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“State-of-the-art calculations using first-principles linear-response techniques (Baroni et al. , 2001) have been successfully applied to a number of problems, starting with the works of Savrasov et al. (1994) and Mauri et al. (1996b), who used respectively the LMTO and planewave pseudopotential methods.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baroni et al. , 2001
- Not checked yetcites Savrasov et al. (1994)
- Not checked yetcites Mauri et al. (1996b)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the following we discuss electron-phonon coupling, for which Wannier-based methods have already proven to be of great utility.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is possible because (a) WFs and bands are related by unitary transformations, and (b) WFs are sufficiently localized that any resulting tightbinding representation may be truncated with little loss of accuracy.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Evaluating this vertex is a key task for a first-principles treatment of electron-phonon couplings.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“They argued that the local electronic structure information associated with C should be similar whether calculated from system A or system B and, therefore, that it should be possible to transfer this information from a calculation on A in order to construct a very good approximation to the electronic structure in the locality of feature C in system B.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hierse and Stechel (1994)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Using the electron-phonon interpolation scheme of Giustino et al. (2007a) to perform the BZ integrations, and a Wannier interpolation of the dynamical matrix to capture Kohn anomalies, the authors found significant nonadiabatic corrections to the phonon frequencies and electronphonon coupling matrix elements in MgB 2 and CaC 6 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Giustino et al. (2007a)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Since MLWFs encode chemically accurate, local (and thus transferable) information, they can act as building blocks to construct the electronic structure of very largescale systems (Lee et al. , 2005).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al. , 2005
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The above interpolation scheme has been applied to a number of problems, including the estimation of T c in superconductors (Giustino et al. , 2007b; Noffsinger et al. , 2008, 2009); the phonon renormalization of energy bands near the Fermi level in graphene (Park et al. , 2007) and copper oxide superconductors (Giustino et al. , 2008);”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Giustino et al. , 2007b
- Not checked yetcites Noffsinger et al. , 2008, 2009
- Not checked yetcites Park et al. , 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A local representation of electronic structure is particularly suited to the study of quantum transport, as we illustrate here in the case of quasi-one-dimensional systems.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In this vein, Aguado et al. (2003a) introduced the use of MLWFs in order to calculate dipole and quadrupole moments in MgO and used these to construct an interatomic potential based on the aspherical ion method (AIM) potential (Rowley et al. , 1998).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aguado et al. (2003a)
- Not checked yetcites Rowley et al. , 1998
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In an ionic system such as this, MLWFs are found to be well-localized close to the ions and each can therefore be associated unambiguously with a particular ion.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First-principles molecular dynamics simulations of large-scale (thousands of atoms) systems for long (nanoseconds) time-scales are computationally costly, if not intractable.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the particular class of ionic condensed matter systems, e.g., first and second row metal oxides, it is well-known that the electronic properties of an ion can be significantly affected by its coordination environment and, therefore, that it is also important to include an accurate description of polarization effects in any interatomic potential.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Maximally-localized Wannier functions were first used in this context by Calzolari et al. (2004), who studied Al and C chains and a (5,0) carbon nanotube with a single Si substitutional defect, and by Lee et al. (2005), who studied covalent functionalizations of metallic nanotubes”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Calzolari et al. (2004)
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al. (2005)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This was quickly followed by a number of applications to ever more realistic systems, studying transport through molecular junctions (Strange et al. , 2008; Thygesen and Jacobsen, 2005), decorated carbon nanotubes and nanoribbons (Cantele et al. , 2009; Lee and Marzari, 2006; Li et al. , 2011; Rasuli et al. , 2010), organic monolayers (Bonferroni et al. , 2008), and silicon nanowires (Shelley and”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Strange et al. , 2008
- Not checked yetcites Thygesen and Jacobsen, 2005
- Not checked yetcites Cantele et al. , 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, the difference in value between the on-site matrix elements from the bulk calculation and those from the calculation with the defect, but far away from the location of the defect, give a direct measure of the potential offset between the two calculations. This offset can then be used to align all of the diagonal matrix elements from one calculation with those of the other, prior to”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The potential obtained exhibits good transferability and the method has been used to parametrize similar potentials for other alkaline earth oxides (Aguado et al. , 2003b), Al 2 O 3 (Jahn et al. , 2006), and the CaO-MgO-Al 2 O 3 -SiO 2 (CMAS) mineral system (Jahn and Madden, 2007).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aguado et al. , 2003b
- Not checked yetcites Jahn et al. , 2006
- Not checked yetcites Jahn and Madden, 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Sagui et al. (2004) show that higher order multipoles, e.g., up to hexadecapole, may be incorporated without computational or numerical difficulty and that agreement with the 'exact' potential obtained from DFT is very good.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sagui et al. (2004)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The idea of partitioning the charge density according to individual MLWFs was also employed by Kirchner and Hutter (2004) in order to determine atomic charges in dimethyl sulfoxide, showing that there can be significant deviations between the gaseous and aqueous forms and, therefore, underlining the importance of using polarizable force-fields for describing solvated systems.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kirchner and Hutter (2004)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In contrast, in a DFT+ U formulation (Anisimov et al. , 1993, 1991) the energy functional is explicitly augmented with a Hubbard term U (Hubbard, 1963) aimed at improving the description of strong interactions, such as those associated with localized d and f electronic states, and at repairing the mean-field underestimation of on-site Coulomb repulsions.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Anisimov et al. , 1993, 1991
- Not checked yetcites Hubbard, 1963
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Finally, we note that recently Rotenberg et al. (2010) have proposed force-fields whose parametrization is based entirely on a partitioning of the electronic density in terms of MLWFs. Their method has been applied successfully to water and molten salts.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rotenberg et al. (2010)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It is interesting to note that numerical evidence suggests that on-site Coulomb interactions (both screened and bare), are maximized when calculated with a basis of MLWFs (Miyake and Aryasetiawan, 2008) and, therefore, that MLWFs may be an optimally localized basis for this purpose.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Miyake and Aryasetiawan, 2008
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“MLWFs provide a localized decomposition of the electronic charge density of a system and can be used as the basis for computing the vdW contribution to the total energy in a post-processing (i.e., non-self-consistent) fashion. In order to render tractable the necessary multi-dimensional integrals, the true MLWFs of the system are substituted by analytic hydrogenic orbitals that have the same”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Andrinopoulos et al. , 2011
- Not checked yetcites Silvestrelli, 2008, 2009b
- Not checked yetcites Andersson et al. (1996)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In this spirit, MLWFs obtained from DFT calculations have been used as the orbital basis for these minimal models. 20 Advantages of using MLWFs include the fact that they can be chosen to span precisely the required energy range (using the disentanglement procedure outlined in Sec. II.I.2), and that they naturally incorporate hybridization and bonding appropriate to their local environment.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Williamson et al. (2001) suggested, instead, to use MLWFs that were smoothly truncated to zero beyond a certain cut-off radius that is independent of system size. This ensures that each electron falls only within the localization region of a fixed number of MLWFs, thus reducing the asymptotic scaling by one factor of N . Furthermore, by representing the MLWFs in a basis of localized spline”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Williamson et al. (2001)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Wu et al. (2009) show that by performing a unitary transformation of the eigenstates to a basis of MLWFs, and working in real-space in order to exploit the fact that spatially distant MLWFs have exponentially vanishing overlap, the number of such overlaps that needs to be calculated scales linearly, in the limit of large system-size, with the number of orbitals (as opposed to quadratically), which”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wu et al. (2009)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The approach was subsequently generalized to isolated manifolds in three-dimensions by Tindemansvan Eijndhoven and Kroese (1975).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tindemansvan Eijndhoven and Kroese (1975)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“It should also be pointed out that the value of U entering the calculations should not be considered universal, as it depends strongly on the manifold chosen (e.g. for pseudopotential calculations on the oxidation state of the reference atomic calculation (Kulik and Marzari, 2008)), or on the structure or electronic-structure of the problem studied.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kulik and Marzari, 2008
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The use of maximal-localization as an exclusive criterion for determining LWFs was first introduced by Giustino and Pasquarello (2006).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Giustino and Pasquarello (2006)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The formalism for obtaining maximally-localized Wannier functions, however, removed this obstacle and several applications of MLWFs to calculating the properties of photonic crystals have been reported since, in both two-dimensional (Garcia-Martin et al. , 2003; Jiao et al. , 2006; Whittaker and Croucher, 2003) and threedimensional (Takeda et al. , 2006) photonic crystal structures, as well as for”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Garcia-Martin et al., 2003
- Not checked yetcites Takeda et al., 2006
- Not checked yetcites Hermann et al., 2008
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Finally, we note that in work that is closely related to, and combines elements from both ideas developed in photonic crystals and cold atoms, WFs have also been used to represent polaritons in coupled cavity arrays, a class of systems that serves as another experimental realization of the Bose-Hubbard model (Hartmann et al. , 2008, 2006).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hartmann et al., 2008, 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other efforts have also seen the implementation of MLWFs in CPMD (CPMD, 1990), GPAW (Enkovaara et al. , 2010), OpenMX (OpenMX, 2011), and WanT (Calzolari et al. , 2004; Ferretti et al. , 2005a) - this latter, and Wannier90 , also allowing for quantum-transport calculations.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites CPMD, 1990
- Not checked yetcites Enkovaara et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Calzolari et al., 2004
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As pointed out by Alfimov et al. (2002), using a WF basis enables the range and type of interactions encapsulated in the DNLSE to be systematically controlled and improved.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Alfimov et al. (2002)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The GrossPitaevskii equation has been used with remarkable success in the study of BEC (Leggett, 2001).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Leggett, 2001
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to the localization and compactness of the basis, these matrix equations may be solved efficiently to find frequencies of localized cavity modes, dispersion relations for waveguides, and the transmission and reflection properties of complex waveguide structures.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the above cases this has been done by providing an interface to the Wannier90 package (Mostofi et al. , 2008), an open-source post-processing code developed by the Authors, offering most of the capabilities described in this review.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mostofi et al., 2008
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This is done via the BoseHubbard model, developed by Fisher et al. (1989) in the context of He-4, and first applied to cold atoms in optical lattices by Jaksch et al. (1998).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fisher et al. (1989)
- Not checked yetcites Jaksch et al. (1998)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For some purposes, e.g., for many planewave based LDA+U and DMFT calculations, methods based on simple projection onto trial orbitals proved sufficient.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Today these methods find applications in many topical areas including investigations into novel superconductors, multiferroics, and topological insulators.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And, as surveyed briefly in Sec. VIII, the construction and application of WFs was also extended to periodic systems outside the electronic-structure context, e.g., to phonons, photonic crystals, and cold-atom optical lattices.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Still, the vast majority of applications of WF methods have been to electronic structure problems.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Methods tuned specifically to Γ-point sampling of the BZ for supercell calculations also became popular.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The band of interest is isolated, remaining separated by a gap from the bands below and above at all k.
“For the moment, we suppose that this band is an isolated band, i.e., it remains separated by a gap from the bands below and above at all k .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The independent-particle approximation is valid for describing the electronic ground state.
“In the independent-particle approximation, the electronic ground state of a system is determined by specifying a set of one-particle orbitals and their occupations.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The Bloch functions on the right-hand side of Eq. (3) belong to a smooth gauge.
“Henceforth we shall assume that the Bloch functions on the righthand side of Eq. (3) belong to a smooth gauge, since we would not get well-localized WFs on the left-hand side otherwise.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The Brillouin zone has been discretized into a uniform Monkhorst-Pack mesh, and the Bloch orbitals have been determined on that mesh.
“In particular, we make the assumption that the BZ has been discretized into a uniform Monkhorst-Pack mesh, and the Bloch orbitals have been determined on that mesh.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The manifold of J bands remains separated by a gap from both lower and higher bands everywhere in the Brillouin zone.
“consider instead a manifold of J bands that remain separated with respect to any lower or higher bands outside the manifold.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The calculations do not include spin-orbit coupling.
“provided of course that the calculations do not include spin-orbit coupling”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most magnetic moments are fairly local.
“Since most magnetic moments are fairly local, such an approach is generally expected to be reasonably accurate.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Strongly localized orbitals are those that suffer most from self-interaction.
“Since strongly localized orbitals are those that suffer most from self-interaction, MLWFs can become an appealing choice to define Hubbard manifolds adapted to the chemistry of the local environment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ultracold atoms in optical lattices have advantages over solid state for studying quantum phenomena, including absence of lattice defects, absence of electron-phonon interaction, and precise control of inter-atomic interactions and optical lattice potential.
“Indeed, they have a number of advantages over the solid state in this respect, such as the absence of lattice defects, the absence of a counterpart to the electron-phonon interaction, and the ability to control precisely both the nature of the inter-atomic interactions and the depth and periodicity of the optical lattice potential.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The majority of excited-states calculations are based on many-body perturbation theory (MBPT), e.g. G 0 W 0 and self-consistent GW [31-33], the Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) [34], or dynamical mean field theory (DMFT) [35], and are performed on-top of a DFT calculation, which provides the starting point for both self-consistent and one-shot approaches.”
From Precision and efficiency in solid-state pseudopotential calculations (2018) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cites
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials
Giannozzi, P., Baroni, S., Bonini, N., Calandra, M., Car, R., Cavazzoni, C., Ceresoli, D., Chiarotti, G., Cococcioni, M., Dabo, I., et al. (2009) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 · Cited by 29,793
Self-citationSelf-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Colloquium : Topological insulators
Hasan, M. Z., & Kane, C. L. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3045 · Cited by 19,930
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Yee, K. (1966) · IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · doi:10.1109/tap.1966.1138693 · Cited by 15,008
Inhibited Spontaneous Emission in Solid-State Physics and Electronics
Yablonovitch, E. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.58.2059 · Cited by 14,175
The nature of the chemical bond—1992
Pauling, L. C. (1992) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed069p519 · Cited by 13,234
The SIESTA method for ab initio order- N materials simulation
Soler, J. M., Artacho, E., Gale, J. D., Garcı́a, A., Junquera, J., Ordejón, P., & Sánchez‐Portal, D. (2002) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302 · Cited by 12,414
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Ashcroft, N. W., 1976, Solid State Physics
- Fattebert, J.-L., 2003, Special Volume: Computational Chemistry
- Grosso, G., 2000, Solid State Physics
- Harrison, W. A., 1980, Solid State Theory
- Heine, V., 1980, Solid State Physics
- Vanderbilt, D., 2006, Conceptual foundations of materials properties: A standard model for calculation of ground- and excited-state properties
- Vuilleumier, R., 2006, Computer Simulations in Condens. Matt. Systems: from Materials to Chemical Biology
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Q uantum ESPRESSO
Giannozzi, P., Andreussi, O., Brumme, T., Bunau, O., Buongiorno Nardelli, M., Calandra, M., Car, R., Cavazzoni, C., Ceresoli, D., Cococcioni, M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa8f79 · Cited by 8,361
Self-citationKühne, T. D., Iannuzzi, M., Del Ben, M., Rybkin, V. V., Seewald, P., Stein, F., Laino, T., Khaliullin, R. Z., Schütt, O., Schiffmann, F., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0007045 · Cited by 4,468
Bradlyn, B., Elcoro, L., Cano, J., Vergniory, M. G., Wang, Z., Felser, C., Aroyo, M. I., & Bernevig, B. A. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23268 · Cited by 1,624
Precision and efficiency in solid-state pseudopotential calculations
Prandini, G., Marrazzo, A., Castelli, I. E., Mounet, N., & Marzari, N. (2018) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-018-0127-2 · Cited by 917
Self-citationQuantum anomalous Hall effect and related topological electronic states
Weng, H., Yu, R., Hu, X., Dai, X., & Fang, Z. (2015) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018732.2015.1068524 · Cited by 506
Metadata
- Authors
- Marzari, N., Mostofi, A. A., Yates, J. R., Souza, I., & Vanderbilt, D.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- Thomas Young Centre (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Ikerbasque (ES)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-10-10
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1419-1475
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2042938036
- Semantic Scholar
- cbb1f4407396d916b9f2401790e79a285c2b348d
- Cited by
- 3,283
- References
- 524
- Citations by year
- 2026: 274 · 2025: 389 · 2024: 371 · 2023: 343 · 2022: 278 · 2021: 295 · 2020: 333 · 2019: 214 · 2018: 212 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 130 · 2015: 116 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 45.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Keywords
- maximally localized Wannier functions, unitary transformation, bonding analysis, electric polarization, orbital magnetization, Wannier interpolation, basis functions, phonon excitations, photonic crystals, periodic systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review