The DOI matches its Crossref record; 370 of the 373 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The classical-quantum boundary for correlations: Discord and related measures
Open accessAbstract
One of the best signatures of nonclassicality in a quantum system is the existence of correlations that have no classical counterpart. Different methods for quantifying the quantum and classical parts of correlations are among the more actively studied topics of quantum-information theory over the past decade. Entanglement is the most prominent of these correlations, but in many cases unentangled states exhibit nonclassical behavior too. Thus distinguishing quantum correlations other than entanglement provides a better division between the quantum and classical worlds, especially when considering mixed states. Here different notions of classical and quantum correlations quantified by quantum discord and other related measures are reviewed. In the first half, the mathematical properties of the measures of quantum correlations are reviewed, related to each other, and the classical-quantum division that is common among them is discussed. In the second half, it is shown that the measures identify and quantify the deviation from classicality in various quantum-information-processing tasks, quantum thermodynamics, open-system dynamics, and many-body physics. It is shown that in many cases quantum correlations indicate an advantage of quantum methods over classical ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, note that this equation does not hold for local maps on the ancilla 1 1 ⊗ E [231,232].”
From Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection (2014) · cites this paper as [231]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1205
(1999) · Industrial Robot the international journal of robotics research and application · doi:10.1108/ir.1999.04926fae.001 · Cited by 39,228
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 · Cited by 10,118
Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics
Tsallis, C. (1988) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01016429 · Cited by 9,589
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 · Cited by 8,290
Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states
Bennett, C. H., & Wiesner, S. J. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2881 · Cited by 5,470
A single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406 · cited 1×
“The task of quantum cloning (Dieks, 1982; Wootters and Zurek, 1982) is achieved by a unitary operation that makes a copy of an unknown state from a given set {|ψi〉}: U |ψi〉 ⊗ |0〉 = |ψi〉 ⊗ |ψi〉.”
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 373 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Holevo, A. S., 1973, Prob. Peredachi Inf., 9, 31
- Holevo, A. S., 1973, Probl. Inf. Transm., 9, 110
- Sen De, A., 2003, J. Mod. Opt., 50, 981
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,000
Hui, N.-J., Xu, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., & Hu, Z.-D. (2017) · Physica B Condensed Matter · doi:10.1016/j.physb.2017.01.009 · Cited by 12
Witnessing the quantumness of a system by observing only its classical features
Marletto, C., & Vedral, V. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0040-4 · Cited by 13
Self-citationCanella, G. A., & França, V. V. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-51986-0 · Cited by 12
Quantum teleportation, entanglement, and Bell nonlocality in correlated noisy channels
Wang, Z.-Y., & Qin, Z.-Y. (2020) · Laser Physics · doi:10.1088/1555-6611/ab7f39 · Cited by 12
Dynamical nonlocality in quantum time via modular operators
Paiva, I. L., Nowakowski, M. L., & Cohen, E. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.042207 · Cited by 13
Concentrating Tripartite Quantum Information
Streltsov, A., Lee, S., & Adesso, G. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.030505 · Cited by 12
Sudden transitions of trace distance discord of dipole–dipole coupled two qubits
Hu, Z.-D., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y.-Q. (2015) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979215501386 · Cited by 12
Kumar, A., Dhar, H. S., Prabhu, R., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2017) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2017.03.026 · Cited by 12
Generalized conditional entropy in bipartite quantum systems
Gigena, N., & Rossignoli, R. (2013) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/1/015302 · Cited by 12
Girolami, D., Schmidt, R., & Adesso, G. (2015) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201500133 · Cited by 10
Shi, J., Wang, D., & Ye, L. (2016) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-015-1233-4 · Cited by 12
One-way deficit and quantum phase transitions in XY model and extended Ising model
Wang, Y., Zhang, Y.-R., & Fan, H. (2018) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-018-2132-2 · Cited by 12
Quantum Discord and Information Deficit in Spin Chains
Canosa, N., Ciliberti, L., & Rossignoli, R. (2015) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e17041634 · Cited by 11
Thermal local quantum uncertainty in a two-qubit-superconducting system under decoherence
Pourkarimi, M. R., Haddadi, S., Nashaat, M., Kulikov, K. V., & Shukrinov, Y. M. (2023) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2023.10.035 · Cited by 11
Quantifying correlations relative to channels via metric-adjusted skew information
Ren, R., Luo, Y., & Li, Y. (2024) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-024-04300-5 · Cited by 11
Nonclassicality and criticality in symmetry-protected magnetic phases
Power, M. J. M., Campbell, S., Moreno-Cardoner, M., & Chiara, G. D. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.214411 · Cited by 11
Classical memoryless noise-induced maximally discordant mixed separable steady states
Altintas, F., Kurt, A., & Eryiğit, R. (2012) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2012.11.004 · Cited by 11
Measurement-induced nonlocality in the two-qubit Heisenberg XY model
Wen-xue, C., Xie, Y.-X., & Xi, X.-Q. (2015) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979215500988 · Cited by 11
Zad, H. A., & Movahhedian, H. (2017) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979217500941 · Cited by 11
Foundations of Quantum Discord
Vedral, V. (2017) · Quantum science and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53412-1_1 · Cited by 11
Self-citationQuantum and classical correlations in high-temperature dynamics of two coupled large spins
Zobov, V. E. (2013) · Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s11232-013-0110-5 · Cited by 11
Thermal quantum metrology in memoryless and correlated environments
Spedalieri, G., Lupo, C., Braunstein, S. L., & Pirandola, S. (2018) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aae284 · Cited by 17
Walczak, Z. (2019) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-019-2437-9 · Cited by 11
All entangled states are quantum coherent with locally distinguishable bases
Mekala, A., & Sen, U. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.l050402 · Cited by 11
Zhang, S., Luo, Y., Shao, L.-H., Xi, Z., & Fan, H. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.052405 · Cited by 11
Mohamed, A. A., Abdel‐Aty, A., El-Hadidy, E. G., & El-Saka, H. A. A. (2021) · Results in Physics · doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104777 · Cited by 11
Quantum versus classical correlations in a double cavity optomechanical system
Lakhfif, A., Hidki, A., Qars, J. E., & Nassik, M. (2022) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ac69bf · Cited by 11
Detecting quantum phase transition via magic resource in the XY spin model
Fu, S., Li, X., & Luo, S. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.062405 · Cited by 12
No-activation theorem for Gaussian nonclassical correlations by Gaussian operations
Mišta, L., McNulty, D., & Adesso, G. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.022328 · Cited by 11
Computable measure of quantum correlation
Akhtarshenas, S. J., Mohammadi, H., karimi, S., & Azmi, Z. (2014) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-014-0839-2 · Cited by 11
Non-Markovianity through multipartite correlation measures
de Paula, F. M., Obando, P. C., & Sarandy, M. S. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.042337 · Cited by 11
Chatzidimitriou‐Dreismann, C. A. (2016) · Quanta · doi:10.12743/quanta.v5i1.48 · Cited by 11
Scalable quantum computing model in the circuit-QED lattice with circulator function
Kim, M. D., & Kim, J. (2017) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-017-1644-5 · Cited by 11
Benchmarks of nonclassicality for qubit arrays
Waegell, M., & Dressel, J. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0181-8 · Cited by 11
From asymmetry to correlations
Li, N., Luo, S., & Sun, Y. (2020) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/130/30004 · Cited by 11
Entanglement–Coherence and Discord–Coherence analytical relations for X states
Young, J. D., & Auyuanet, A. (2020) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-020-02907-y · Cited by 11
Abhignan, V., & Muthuganesan, R. (2021) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ac322f · Cited by 11
Dynamical bipartite and tripartite entanglement of mechanical oscillators in an optomechanical array
Hao, X., Zhang, X. Y., Zhou, Y. H., Li, W., Hou, S. C., & Yi, X. X. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.053515 · Cited by 11
Noiseless linear amplification in quantum target detection using Gaussian states
Karsa, A., Ghalaii, M., & Pirandola, S. (2022) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac781b · Cited by 11
Song, W., & Cao, Z. (2013) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-013-1835-5 · Cited by 13
Witnessing the quantumness of a single system: From anticommutators to interference and discord
Rosario Fazio, B., Modi, K. K., Pascazio, S., Vedral, V., & Yuasa, K. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.052132 · Cited by 11
Self-citationMohamed, A. A., Khalil, E. M., Selim, M. M., & Eleuch, H. (2021) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym13020352 · Cited by 11
Distribution of quantum entanglement : principles and applications
Krisnanda, I. W. G. T. (2020) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/137381 · Cited by 11
Data-driven criteria for quantum correlations
Krawczyk, M., Pawłowski, J., Maśka, M. M., & Roszak, K. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.022405 · Cited by 12
A comparative study of LQU and LQFI in general qubit-qutrit axially symmetric states
Yurischev, M. A., Haddadi, S., & Ghominejad, M. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-84857-4 · Cited by 10
Quantum state space dimension as a quantum resource
Plastino, A., Bellomo, G., & Plastino, A. R. (2015) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749915500392 · Cited by 10
Exact and efficient simulation of concordant computation
Cable, H. V., & Browne, D. E. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/11/113049 · Cited by 10
Self-citationUniversal quantum correlation close to quantum critical phenomena
Qin, M., Ren, Z., & Zhang, X. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26042 · Cited by 10
Nonlocal advantage of quantum coherence in the Heisenberg XY model
Xie, Y.-X., & Gao, Y.-Y. (2019) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-202x/ab0c8f · Cited by 10
Quantum state space dimension as a quantum resource
Plastino, Á. L., Bellomo, G., & Plastino, Á. R. (2015) · El Servicio de Difusión de la Creación Intelectual (National University of La Plata) · Cited by 10
Quantum synchronisation and clustering in chiral networks
Lorenzo, S., Militello, B., Napoli, A., Zambrini, R., & Palma, G. M. (2022) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac51a9 · Cited by 10
Renormalization of steered coherence and quantum phase transitions in the alternating Ising model
Xie, Y.-X., & Sun, Y. (2023) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2023.128617 · Cited by 10
The power of one clean qubit in supervised machine learning
Karimi, M., Javadi-Abhari, A., Simon, C., & Ghobadi, R. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-46497-y · Cited by 10
Experimental verification of the steering ellipsoid zoo via two-qubit states
Xu, K., Liu, L., Wang, N., Zhang, C., Huang, Y., Liu, B., Cheng, S., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.032415 · Cited by 10
Interference visibility, entanglement, and quantum correlation
Zhang, L., Pati, A. K., & Wu, J. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.022316 · Cited by 10
Quantum discord ofSU(2) invariant states
Çakmak, B., & Gedik, Z. (2013) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/46/465302 · Cited by 10
One-way deficit of two-qubit $$X$$ X states
Wang, Y., Jing, N., Fei, S.-M., Wang, Z., Cao, J.-P., & Fan, H. (2015) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-015-1005-1 · Cited by 10
Geometric measure of quantum discord with weak measurements
Li, L., Wang, Q., Shen, S., & Li, M. (2015) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-015-1184-9 · Cited by 10
Revival and robustness of Bures distance discord under decoherence channels
Shi, J., Wang, D., Ma, Y., & Ye, L. (2015) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2015.11.039 · Cited by 10
Lower bounds on the violation of the monogamy inequality for quantum correlation measures
Kumar, A., & Dhar, H. S. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.062337 · Cited by 10
Giorda, P., & Allegra, M. (2017) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa70b7 · Cited by 12
The number of terms in the superpositions upper bounds the amount of the coherence change
Liu, F., & Li, F. (2016) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-016-1399-4 · Cited by 10
Unification of quantum resources in distributed scenarios
Zhou, H., Yuan, X., & Ma, X. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.022326 · Cited by 11
Canella, G. A., & França, V. V. (2019) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.123646 · Cited by 10
Coherent dynamics of a qubit–oscillator system in a noisy environment
Wu, W., & Cheng, J.-Q. (2018) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-018-2071-y · Cited by 10
Quantum coherence versus nonclassical correlations in optomechanics
Lahlou, Y., Amazioug, M., Qars, J. E., Habiballah, N., Mohammed Daoud, A., & Nassik, M. (2019) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979219503430 · Cited by 10
Witnesses of non-classicality for simulated hybrid quantum systems
Bhole, G., Jones, J. A., Marletto, C., & Vedral, V. (2020) · Journal of Physics Communications · doi:10.1088/2399-6528/ab772b · Cited by 10
Self-citationQubit-environment-entanglement generation and the spin echo
Roszak, K., & Cywiński, Ł. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.032208 · Cited by 10
Quantum correlated coherence and Hellinger distance in the critical systems
Ye, B., & Zhang, Z. (2020) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732321500024 · Cited by 10
Evolution of quantum correlations in a two-atom system
Tanaś, R. (2013) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2013/t153/014059 · Cited by 10
Zhang, J.-S., & Chen, A. (2014) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/47/21/215502 · Cited by 10
Li, G., Liu, Y., Tang, H., Yin, X., & Zhang, Z. (2014) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-014-0888-6 · Cited by 10
Mishra, U., Rakshit, D., & Prabhu, R. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.042322 · Cited by 11
Universality in distribution of monogamy scores for random multiqubit pure states
Rethinasamy, S., Roy, S., Chanda, T., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.042302 · Cited by 10
Geometric global quantum discordPreprint
Xu, J. (2016) · Cited by 10
Correlation Spectroscopy with Multiqubit-Enhanced Phase Estimation
Hainzer, H., Kiesenhofer, D., Ollikainen, T., Bock, M., Kranzl, F., Joshi, M. K., Yoeli, G., Blatt, R., Gefen, T., & Roos, C. F. (2024) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.011033 · Cited by 11
The quantum Gaussian–Schell model: a link between classical and quantum optics
Dawkins, R. B., Hong, M., You, C., & Magaña‐Loaiza, O. S. (2024) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.520444 · Cited by 10
Classifying Two-Body Hamiltonians for Quantum Darwinism
Doucet, E., & Deffner, S. (2024) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.041064 · Cited by 9
Cumulative quantum work-deficit versus entanglement in the dynamics of an infinite spin chain
Dhar, H. S., Ghosh, R., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2014) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2014.03.015 · Cited by 9
Mazurek, P., Roszak, K., & Horodecki, P. (2014) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/107/67004 · Cited by 9
A revisit to non-maximally entangled mixed states: teleportation witness, noisy channel and discord
Roy, S., & Ghosh, B. (2017) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-017-1557-3 · Cited by 9
Quantum discord of states arising from graphs
Dutta, S., Adhikari, B., & Banerjee, S. (2017) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-017-1636-5 · Cited by 9
Extremal properties of conditional entropy and quantum discord for XXZ, symmetric quantum states
Yurischev, M. A. (2017) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-017-1701-0 · Cited by 9
Dynamics of Quantum Correlation in de Sitter Spacetime
Huang, Z., & Tian, Z. (2017) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.86.094003 · Cited by 9
Liu, Z.-W., Takagi, R., & Lloyd, S. (2019) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab0774 · Cited by 10
Connecting commutativity and classicality for multitime quantum processes
Sakuldee, F., Taranto, P., & Milz, S. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.022416 · Cited by 10
Su, L.-L., Ren, J., Wang, Z. D., & Bai, Y.-K. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.042427 · Cited by 9
Extreme violation of the Leggett-Garg inequality in nonunitary dynamics with complex energies
Varma, A. V., Muldoon, J., Paul, S., Joglekar, Y. N., & Das, S. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.032202 · Cited by 9
Rijavec, S. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.063507 · Cited by 9
Measuring quantumness: from theory to observability in interferometric setups
Ferro, L., Fazio, R., Illuminati, F., Marmo, G., Pascazio, S., & Vedral, V. (2018) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2018-90522-y · Cited by 12
Self-citationDynamics of entanglement and quantum discord in the Tavis–Cummings model
Restrepo, J., & Rodríguez, B. A. (2016) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/49/12/125502 · Cited by 9
Gheorghiu, V., de Oliveira, M. C., & Sanders, B. C. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.030403 · Cited by 9
Dynamics of Nonclassical Correlations with an Initial Correlation
Hu, Z.-D., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y.-Q. (2014) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.83.114004 · Cited by 9
MEASUREMENT-INDUCED NONLOCALITY OVER TWO-SIDED PROJECTIVE MEASUREMENTS
Guo, Y. J. (2013) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979213500677 · Cited by 10
Elucidating Dicke superradiance by quantum uncertainty
dos Santos, E. M., & Duzzioni, E. I. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.023819 · Cited by 9
Dai, Y.-W., Cho, S. Y., Batchelor, M. T., & Zhou, H.-Q. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.014419 · Cited by 9
Direct observation of phase-sensitive Hong-Ou-Mandel interference
Marek, P., Zapletal, P., Filip, R., Hashimoto, Y., Toyama, T., Yoshikawa, J., Makino, K., & Furusawa, A. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.033830 · Cited by 8
Conditional quantum entropy power inequality for d -level quantum systems
Jeong, K., Lee, S., & Jeong, H. (2018) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aab037 · Cited by 9
Coherence distribution in multipartite systems
Xi, Z. (2018) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aabb23 · Cited by 9
Jiménez, O., Solís-Prosser, M. A., Neves, L., & Delgado, A. (2019) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e21030263 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Modi, K., Brodutch, A., Cable, H., Paterek, T., & Vedral, V.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Quantum Technologies (SG)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-11-26
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1655-1707
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2082014836
- Semantic Scholar
- 1de3d1784cca4dc5dd2b0afb7050b4dd4c03e9ab
- Cited by
- 1,600
- References
- 373
- Citations by year
- 2026: 69 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 126 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 158 · 2016: 151 · 2015: 156 · 2014: 146 · 2013: 130 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 139.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- John Templeton Foundation
- University of Oxford
- National Research Foundation
- Centre for Quantum Technologies
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- quantum discord, quantum correlations, quantum-to-classical transition, nonclassicality, entanglement, mixed states, quantum thermodynamics, open-system dynamics, many-body physics, quantum advantage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
