The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
First-principles calculations for point defects in solids
Abstract
Point defects and impurities strongly affect the physical properties of materials and have a decisive impact on their performance in applications. First-principles calculations have emerged as a powerful approach that complements experiments and can serve as a predictive tool in the identification and characterization of defects. The theoretical modeling of point defects in crystalline materials by means of electronic-structure calculations, with an emphasis on approaches based on density functional theory (DFT), is reviewed. A general thermodynamic formalism is laid down to investigate the physical properties of point defects independent of the materials class (semiconductors, insulators, and metals), indicating how the relevant thermodynamic quantities, such as formation energy, entropy, and excess volume, can be obtained from electronic structure calculations. Practical aspects such as the supercell approach and efficient strategies to extrapolate to the isolated-defect or dilute limit are discussed. Recent advances in tractable approximations to the exchange-correlation functional ($\mathrm{DFT}+U$, hybrid functionals) and approaches beyond DFT are highlighted. These advances have largely removed the long-standing uncertainty of defect formation energies in semiconductors and insulators due to the failure of standard DFT to reproduce band gaps. Two case studies illustrate how such calculations provide new insight into the physics and role of point defects in real materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Self-citationSpecial points for Brillouin-zone integrations
Monkhorst, H. J., & Pack, J. D. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188 · Cited by 71,721
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches
Onida, G., Reining, L., & Rubio, A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.601 · Cited by 4,155
Twist-averaged boundary conditions in continuum quantum Monte Carlo algorithms
Lin, C., Zong, F. H., & Ceperley, D. M. (2001) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.016702 · Cited by 371
Cited by
Ultrawide‐Bandgap Semiconductors: Research Opportunities and Challenges
Tsao, J. Y., Chowdhury, S., Hollis, M. A., Jena, D., Johnson, N. M., Jones, K. A., Kaplar, R. J., Rajan, S., Van de Walle, C. G., Bellotti, E., et al. (2018) · Advanced Electronic Materials · doi:10.1002/aelm.201600501 · Cited by 1,602
Self-citationBrenner, T. M., Egger, D. A., Kronik, L., Hodes, G., & Cahen, D. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2015.7 · Cited by 1,557
High Defect Tolerance in Lead Halide Perovskite CsPbBr3
Kang, J., & Wang, L.-W. (2017) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02800 · Cited by 1,305
Rare-Earth Doping in Nanostructured Inorganic Materials
Zheng, B., Fan, J., Chen, B., Qin, X., Wang, J., Wang, F., Deng, R., & Liu, X. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00644 · Cited by 1,204
From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science–a review
Schleder, G. R., Padilha, A. C. M., Acosta, C. M., Costa, M., & Fazzio, A. (2019) · Journal of Physics: Materials · doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b · Cited by 852
Metadata
- Authors
- Freysoldt, C., Grabowski, B., Hickel, T., Neugebauer, J., Kresse, G., Janotti, A., & Van de Walle, C. G.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-03-28
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 253-305
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W1963934009
- Cited by
- 3,037
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 77.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First-principles calculations for point defects in solids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.86.253
- The paper
- Freysoldt, C., Grabowski, B., Hickel, T., Neugebauer, J., Kresse, G., Janotti, A., & Van de Walle, C. G. (2014). First-principles calculations for point defects in solids. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.86.253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.