The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum Monte Carlo methods for nuclear physics
Open accessAbstract
Quantum Monte Carlo techniques aim at providing a description of complex quantum systems such as nuclei and nucleonic matter from first principles, i.e., realistic nuclear interactions and currents. The methods are similar to those used for many-electron systems in quantum chemistry and condensed matter physics, but are extended to include spin-isospin, tensor, spin-orbit, and three-body interactions. This review shows how to build the atomic nucleus from the ground up. Examples include the structure of light nuclei, electroweak response of nuclei relevant in electron and neutrino scattering, and the properties of dense nucleonic matter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
Modern theory of nuclear forces
Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W., & Meißner, U.-G. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1773 · Cited by 1,883
Twist-averaged boundary conditions in continuum quantum Monte Carlo algorithms
Lin, C., Zong, F. H., & Ceperley, D. M. (2001) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.016702 · Cited by 371
Cited by
Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks
Carleo, G., & Troyer, M. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aag2302 · Cited by 2,215
FLAG Review 2019: Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)
Aoki, S., Aoki, Y., Bečirević, D., Blum, T., Colangelo, G., Collins, S., Della Morte, M., Dimopoulos, P., Dürr, S., Fukaya, H., et al. (2020) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7354-7 · Cited by 710
Aoki, Y., Blum, T., Colangelo, G., Collins, S., Morte, M. D., Dimopoulos, P., Dürr, S., Feng, X., Fukaya, H., Golterman, M., et al. (2022) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10536-1 · Cited by 587
Status and future of nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double-beta decay: a review
Engel, J., & Menéndez, J. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa5bc5 · Cited by 533
Cloud Quantum Computing of an Atomic Nucleus
Dumitrescu, E. F., McCaskey, A. J., Hagen, G., Jansen, G. R., Morris, T. D., Papenbrock, T., Pooser, R. C., Dean, D. J., & Lougovski, P. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.210501 · Cited by 393
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlson, J., Gandolfi, S., Pederiva, F., Pieper, S. C., Schiavilla, R., Schmidt, K. E., & Wiringa, R. B.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2015-09-09
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1067-1118
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2149739919
- Cited by
- 818
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 31.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum Monte Carlo methods for nuclear physics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.87.1067
- The paper
- Carlson, J., Gandolfi, S., Pederiva, F., Pieper, S. C., Schiavilla, R., Schmidt, K. E., & Wiringa, R. B. (2015). Quantum Monte Carlo methods for nuclear physics. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.87.1067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
