Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 591

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 217 of the 217 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum error mitigation

Open access
Cai, Zhenyu, Babbush, Ryan, Benjamin, Simon C., Endo, Suguru, Huggins, William J., Li, Ying, McClean, Jarrod R., O’Brien, Thomas E.·2023·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

In most of physics it is normal to obtain information by analysis of noisy data. The paradigm of quantum computing has been a simplified version of this -- one measurement of a two-level system gives one bit of reliable information about the result of a computation. But real-world quantum computers do not work this way: the noisiness of quantum evolution also requires good strategies for extracting information. This review covers many error-mitigation strategies used in present-day quantum processors. These strategies make it much more feasible to obtain useful results before fault tolerance is achieved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.95.045005

Cites

217 of 217 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 217 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Aharonov, D., 1997, Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC ’97), El Paso, TX, 1997
  2. 10.1063/1.4965888 · doi:10.1063/1.4965888
  3. Dinur, Irit, 2022, Proceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2022), Rome, 2022
  4. Giurgica-Tiron, Tudor, 2020, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), Denver, 2020
  5. Hamilton, Kathleen E., 2020, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), Denver, 2020
  6. 10.1038/s41534-022-00668-3 · DOI
  7. Hiai, Fumio, 2008, Selected Papers of M. Ohya
  8. Panteleev, Pavel, 2022, Proceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2022), Rome, 2022
  9. 10.1038/s41534-022-00668-3 · DOI
  10. Shor, P. W., 1996, Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science, Burlington, VT, 1996
  11. Tannu, Swamit S., 2019, Proceedings of the 52nd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO ’52), Columbus, OH, 2019
  12. 10.1073/pnas.2006337117 · DOI

Cited by

See all 591

Metadata

Authors
Cai, Z., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S. C., Endo, S., Huggins, W. J., Li, Y., McClean, J. R., & O’Brien, T. E.
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
2023-12-13
Volume
95
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0756
OpenAlex
W4389672456
Cited by
591
References
217
FWCI
51.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T001062/1, EP/W032635/1)
  • St. John’s College, University of Oxford
  • Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJMS2061, JPMJPR2114)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (JPMXS0120319794)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11875050, 12088101)
  • National Safety Academic Fund (U1930403)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum error mitigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.95.045005
The paper
Cai, Z., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S. C., Endo, S., Huggins, W. J., Li, Y., McClean, J. R., & O’Brien, T. E. (2023). Quantum error mitigation. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.95.045005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.