Multiorbital dynamical mean-field theory with a complex-time solver
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
We present the combination of a complex-time tensor-network impurity solver with an analytic continuation scheme based on exponential fitting as an efficient framework for single and multiorbital dynamical mean-field calculations. By performing time evolution along a complex-time contour, the approach balances computational cost with the difficulty of spectral recovery, offering greater flexibility than methods confined to the real or imaginary axis. By complementing the complex-time evolution with an exponential fitting scheme, we faithfully extract real-time information at negligible cost. The resulting method obtains high-resolution spectra at a significantly lower computational cost than real-time evolution, offering a promising tool for studies of strongly correlated materials.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states
Haegeman, J., Lubich, C., Oseledets, I., Vandereycken, B., & Verstraete, F. (2016) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.165116 · Cited by 804 · see citing works
Simulating strongly correlated quantum systems with tree tensor networks
Murg, V., Verstraete, F., Legeza, Ö., & Noack, R. M. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.205105 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states
Vanderstraeten, L., Haegeman, J., & Verstraete, F. (2019) · SciPost Physics Lecture Notes · doi:10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.7 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Yu, Y., Zhang, L., Gull, E., Cao, X., & Dong, X.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- Physical Review Research
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2026-05-11
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2643-1564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7148234675
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFA1408602)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (12504289)
- National Science Foundation (2401159, 2310182)
- European Research Council (101142136)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- analytic continuation, exponential fitting, strongly correlated systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review