The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Expansion-history preferences of DESI DR2 and external data
Open accessAbstract
We explore the origin of the preference of DESI DR2 baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements and external data from cosmic microwave background (CMB) and type Ia supernovae (SNIa) that dark energy behavior departs from that expected in the standard cosmological model with vacuum energy ($Λ$CDM). In our analysis, we allow a flexible scaling of the expansion rate with redshift that nevertheless allows reasonably tight constraints on the quantities of interest, and adopt and validate a simple yet accurate compression of the CMB data that allows us to constrain our phenomenological model of the expansion history. We find that data consistently show a preference for a 3-4 % increase in the expansion rate at $z\simeq 0.7$ relative to that predicted by the standard $Λ$CDM model, in excellent agreement with results from the less flexible $(w_0, w_a)$ parameterization which was used in previous analyses. Even though our model allows a departure from the best-fit $Λ$CDM model at zero redshift, we find no evidence for such a signal. We also find no evidence (at greater than 1$σ$ significance) for a departure of the expansion rate from the $Λ$CDM predictions at higher redshifts for any of the data combinations that we consider. Overall, our results strengthen the robustness of the findings using the combination of DESI, CMB, and SNIa data to dark-energy modeling assumptions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 · DOI
- 10.3847/1538-3881/ac882b · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.091301 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1142/S0218271801000822 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.023532 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/048 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123502 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/120 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/024 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123524 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083507 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063534 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/12/007 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.103524 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123533 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083552 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123519 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083528 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/05/065 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/057 · DOI
- 10.1093/mnras/291.1.L33 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.103533 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20077292 · DOI
- 10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/08/023 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/12/022 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/009 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201936386 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3847/1538-4357/acff5f · DOI
- 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f · DOI
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a · DOI
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4698 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.141301 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.123527 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/039 · DOI
- 10.1086/309179 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/177989 · DOI
- 10.3390/universe11010010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138717 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101511 · DOI
- 10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Bansal, P., & Huterer, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Michigan
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2025-07-15
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0029
- OpenAlex
- W4411029079
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0019193)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- expansion history, DESI DR2, cosmological constraints, external data, baryon acoustic oscillations, galaxy surveys, dark energy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review