The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcriptome Changes for Arabidopsis in Response to Salt, Osmotic, and Cold Stress,
Open accessAbstract
To identify genes of potential importance to cold, salt, and drought tolerance, global expression profiling was performed on Arabidopsis plants subjected to stress treatments of 4°C, 100 mm NaCl, or 200 mm mannitol, respectively. RNA samples were collected separately from leaves and roots after 3- and 27-h stress treatments. Profiling was conducted with a GeneChip microarray with probe sets for approximately 8,100 genes. Combined results from all three stresses identified 2,409 genes with a greater than 2-fold change over control. This suggests that about 30% of the transcriptome is sensitive to regulation by common stress conditions. The majority of changes were stimulus specific. At the 3-h time point, less than 5% (118 genes) of the changes were observed as shared by all three stress responses. By 27 h, the number of shared responses was reduced more than 10-fold (< 0.5%), consistent with a progression toward more stimulus-specific responses. Roots and leaves displayed very different changes. For example, less than 14% of the cold-specific changes were shared between root and leaves at both 3 and 27 h. The gene with the largest induction under all three stress treatments was At5g52310 (LTI/COR78), with induction levels in roots greater than 250-fold for cold, 40-fold for mannitol, and 57-fold for NaCl. A stress response was observed for 306 (68%) of the known circadian controlled genes, supporting the hypothesis that an important function of the circadian clock is to “anticipate” predictable stresses such as cold nights. Although these results identify hundreds of potentially important transcriptome changes, the biochemical functions of many stress-regulated genes remain unknown.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant productivity and environment
Boyer, J. S. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.218.4571.443 · Cited by 3,959
Cited by
Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination
Mittler, R. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002 · Cited by 3,083
The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field
Atkinson, N. J., & Urwin, P. E. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ers100 · Cited by 1,880
The MKK2 Pathway Mediates Cold and Salt Stress Signaling in Arabidopsis
Teige, M., Scheikl, E., Eulgem, T., Dóczi, R., Ichimura, K., Shinozaki, K., Dangl, J. L., & Hirt, H. (2004) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.023 · Cited by 1,002
Physiological and molecular changes in plants grown at low temperatures
Theocharis, A., Clément, C., & Barka, E. A. (2012) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-012-1641-y · Cited by 773
Covington, M. F., Maloof, J. N., Straume, M., Kay, S. A., & Harmer, S. L. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-8-r130 · Cited by 747
Metadata
- Authors
- Kreps, J. A., Wu, Y., Chang, H.-S., Zhu, T., Wang, X., & Harper, J. F.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2129-2141
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1985600167
- Cited by
- 1,574
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 67.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcriptome Changes for Arabidopsis in Response to Salt, Osmotic, and Cold Stress,. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.008532
- The paper
- Kreps, J. A., Wu, Y., Chang, H.-S., Zhu, T., Wang, X., & Harper, J. F. (2002). Transcriptome Changes for Arabidopsis in Response to Salt, Osmotic, and Cold Stress,. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.008532
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.