The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expression Profiling of the Whole Arabidopsis Shaggy-Like Kinase Multigene Family by Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction
Open accessAbstract
The recent publication of the complete sequence of the Arabidopsis genome allowed us to identify and characterize the last two members of the SHAGGY-like kinase (AtSK) gene family. As a result, the study of the overall spatio-temporal organization of the whole AtSK family in Arabidopsis has become an achievable and necessary aim to understand the role of each SHAGGY-like kinase during plant development. An analysis of the transcript level of the 10 members of the family has been performed using the technique of real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Transcript levels in several organs, under different growth conditions, were analyzed. To calibrate the results obtained, a number of other genes, such as those coding for the two MAP3Kεs and the two MAP4Kαs, as well as the stress response marker RD29A; the small subunit of the Rubisco photosynthetic enzyme Ats1A; the MEDEA chromatin remodeling factor; and the SCARECROW, ASYMMETRIC LEAVES 1, and SUPERMAN transcription factors all involved in key steps of plant development were used. The analysis of our data revealed that eight of the 10 genes of the AtSK family displayed a pseudo-constitutive expression pattern at the organ level. Conversely,AtSK13 responded to osmotic changes and saline treatment, whereas AtSK31 was flower specific and responded to osmotic changes and darkness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Di Laurenzio, L., Wysocka-Diller, J., Malamy, J. E., Pysh, L., Helariutta, Y., Freshour, G., Hahn, M. G., Feldmann, K. A., & Benfey, P. N. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80115-4 · Cited by 1,124
Cited by
Czechowski, T., Stitt, M., Altmann, T., Udvardi, M. K., & Scheible, W.-R. (2005) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.105.063743 · Cited by 3,203
Identification and validation of reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR normalization in wheat
Paolacci, A. R., Tanzarella, O. A., Porceddu, E., & Ciaffi, M. (2009) · BMC Molecular Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2199-10-11 · Cited by 687
Zhu, S.-Y., Yu, X.-C., Wang, X.-J., Zhao, R., Li, Y., Fan, R.-C., Shang, Y., Du, S.-Y., Wang, X.-F., Wu, F.-Q., et al. (2007) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.107.050666 · Cited by 632
A Role for the GCC-Box in Jasmonate-Mediated Activation of the PDF1.2 Gene of Arabidopsis
Brown, R. L., Kazan, K., McGrath, K. C., Maclean, D. J., & Manners, J. M. (2003) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.102.017814 · Cited by 422
Mora-García, S., Vert, G., Yin, Y., Caño-Delgado, A., Cheong, H., & Chory, J. (2004) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1174204 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Charrier, B., Champion, A., Henry, Y., & Kreis, M.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-10-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 577-590
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2094637093
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expression Profiling of the Whole Arabidopsis Shaggy-Like Kinase Multigene Family by Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.009175
- The paper
- Charrier, B., Champion, A., Henry, Y., & Kreis, M. (2002). Expression Profiling of the Whole Arabidopsis Shaggy-Like Kinase Multigene Family by Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.009175
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
