Cited by 299Transgenic Plants and ApplicationsAntimicrobial Peptides and ActivitiesPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity

Expression of an Antimicrobial Peptide via the Chloroplast Genome to Control Phytopathogenic Bacteria and Fungi

Open access
DeGray, Gerald, Rajasekaran, Kanniah, Smith, Franzine, Sanford, John, Daniell, Henry·2001·Plant Physiology

Abstract

The antimicrobial peptide MSI-99, an analog of magainin 2, was expressed via the chloroplast genome to obtain high levels of expression in transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum var. Petit Havana) plants. Polymerase chain reaction products and Southern blots confirmed integration of MSI-99 into the chloroplast genome and achievement of homoplasmy, whereas northern blots confirmed transcription. Contrary to previous predictions, accumulation of MSI-99 in transgenic chloroplasts did not affect normal growth and development of the transgenic plants. This may be due to differences in the lipid composition of plastid membranes compared with the membranes of susceptible target microbes. In vitro assays with protein extracts from T1 and T2 plants confirmed that MSI-99 was expressed at high levels to provide 88% (T1) and 96% (T2) inhibition of growth against Pseudomonas syringae pv tabaci, a major plant pathogen. When germinated in the absence of spectinomycin selection, leaf extracts from T2 generation plants showed 96% inhibition of growth against P. syringae pv tabaci. In addition, leaf extracts from transgenic plants (T1) inhibited the growth of pregerminated spores of three fungal species,Aspergillus flavus, Fusarium moniliforme, and Verticillium dahliae, by more than 95% compared with non-transformed control plant extracts. In planta assays with the bacterial pathogen P. syringae pv tabaciresulted in areas of necrosis around the point of inoculation in control leaves, whereas transformed leaves showed no signs of necrosis, demonstrating high-dose release of the peptide at the site of infection by chloroplast lysis. In planta assays with the fungal pathogen,Colletotrichum destructivum, showed necrotic anthracnose lesions in non-transformed control leaves, whereas transformed leaves showed no lesions. Genetically engineering crop plants for disease resistance via the chloroplast genome instead of the nuclear genome is desirable to achieve high levels of expression and to prevent pollen-mediated escape of transgenes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.010233

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antimicrobial peptides could be expressed from a single heterologous gene, as has been shown in the nucleus and chloroplast of plants.

    “As an alternative, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) could be expressed from a single heterologous gene, as has been shown in the nucleus and chloroplast of plants [74,75].”

    From Biofuels from algae: Challenges and potential (2010) · cites this paper as [74]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 299

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/plphys/article/127/3/852/6110214 by guest on 31 August 2023
  2. Plant Physiol.Vol.127, 2001 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/plphys/article/127/3/852/6110214 by guest on 31 August 2023

Authors
DeGray, G., Rajasekaran, K., Smith, F., Sanford, J., & Daniell, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Sanford Scientific Inc., 877 Marshall Road, Waterloo, New York 13165 (F.S., J.S.)
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
127
Issue
3
Pages
852-862
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2018822159
Cited by
299
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
FWCI
14.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Transgenic Plants and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Keywords
antimicrobial peptides, chloroplast genome, transgenic tobacco, plastid transformation, homoplasmy, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci, Colletotrichum destructivum, Aspergillus flavus, Fusarium verticillioides, Verticillium dahliae, antifungal activity, plant disease resistance
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Antifungal Agents, Chloroplasts, Mitosporic Fungi, Peptides, Plant Diseases, Plant Extracts, Plant Proteins, Pseudomonas, Recombinant Proteins, Nicotiana, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Apoptosis, Peptide Library, Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides, Xenopus Proteins, Plants, Genetically Modified, Magainins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review