The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sodium Fluxes through Nonselective Cation Channels in the Plasma Membrane of Protoplasts from Arabidopsis Roots
Open accessAbstract
The aim of the present work was to characterize Na+currents through nonselective cation channels (NSCCs) in protoplasts derived from root cells of Arabidopsis. The procedure of the protoplast isolation was modified to increase the stability of Arabidopsis root protoplasts in low external Ca2+ by digesting tissue in elevated Ca2+. Experiments in whole-cell and outside-out modes were carried out. We found that Na+ currents in Arabidopsis root protoplasts were mediated by cation channels that were insensitive to externally applied tetraethylammonium+ and verapamil, had no time-dependent activation (permanently opened or completely activated within 1–2 ms), were voltage independent, and were weakly selective for monovalent cations. The selectivity sequence was as follows: K+ (1.49) > NH4 + (1.24) > Rb+ (1.15) ≈ Cs+ (1.10) ≈ Na+ (1.00) > Li+ (0.73) > tetraethylammonium+ (0.47). Arabidopsis root NSCCs were blocked by H+ (pK ≈ 6.0), Ca2+(K1/2 ≈ 0.1 mm), Ba2+, Zn2+, La3+, Gd3+, quinine, and the His modifier diethylpyrocarbonate. They were insensitive to most organic blockers (nifedipine, verapamil, flufenamate, and amiloride) and to the SH-group modifier p-chloromercuriphenyl sulfonic acid. Voltage-insensitive, Ca2+-sensitive single channels were also resolved. Properties of Arabidopsis root NSCCs are discussed and compared with characteristics of similar conductances studied previously in plants and animals. It is suggested that NSCCs present a distinct group of plant ion channels, mediating toxic Na+ influx to the cell and probably having other important roles in physiological processes of plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels
Dingledine, R., Borges, K., Bowie, D., & Traynelis, S. F. (1999) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01394-2 · Cited by 3,554
Cited by
Na+ Tolerance and Na+ Transport in Higher Plants
TESTER, M. (2003) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcg058 · Cited by 3,250
Self-citationSalinity tolerance in halophytes*
Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x · Cited by 2,789
WHITE, P. J. (2003) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcg164 · Cited by 2,381
Salt Tolerance Mechanisms of Plants
van Zelm, E., Zhang, Y., & Testerink, C. (2020) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100005 · Cited by 2,261
Insights into plant salt stress signaling and tolerance
Zhou, H., Shi, H., Yang, Y., Feng, X., Chen, X., Xiao, F., Lin, H., & Guo, Y. (2024) · Journal of Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2023.08.007 · Cited by 677
Metadata
- Authors
- Demidchik, V., & Tester, M.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 379-387
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1989908853
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.