The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distinctive Responses of Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase and Carbonic Anhydrase in Wheat Leaves to Nitrogen Nutrition and their Possible Relationships to CO2-Transfer Resistance
Open accessAbstract
The amounts of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), total chlorophyll (Chl), and total leaf nitrogen were measured in fully expanded, young leaves of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), rice (Oryza sativa L.), spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.), bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), and pea (Pisum sativum L.). In addition, the activities of whole-chain electron transport and carbonic anhydrase were measured. All plants were grown hydroponically at different nitrogen concentrations. Although a greater than proportional increase in Rubisco content relative to leaf nitrogen content and Chl was found with increasing nitrogen supply for rice, spinach, bean, and pea, the ratio of Rubisco to total leaf nitrogen or Chl in wheat was essentially independent of nitrogen treatment. In addition, the ratio of Rubisco to electron transport activities remained constant only in wheat. Nevertheless, gas-exchange analysis showed that the in vivo balance between the capacities of Rubisco and electron transport in wheat, rice, and spinach remained almost constant, irrespective of nitrogen treatment. The in vitro carbonic anhydrase activity in wheat was very low and strongly responsive to increasing nitrogen content. Such a response was not found for the other C(3) plants examined, which had 10- to 30-fold higher carbonic anhydrase activity than wheat at any leaf-nitrogen content. These distinctive responses of carbonic anhydrase activity in wheat were discussed in relation to CO(2)-transfer resistance and the in vivo balance between the capacities of Rubisco and electron transport.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
STITT, M., & KRAPP, A. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00386.x · Cited by 1,044
White, M. A., Thornton, P. E., Running, S. W., & Nemani, R. R. (2000) · Earth Interactions · doi:10.1175/1087-3562(2000)004<0003:pasaot>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 846
The Role of Carbonic Anhydrase in Photosynthesis
Badger, M. (1994) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.45.1.369 · Cited by 816
Bernacchi, C. J., Portis, A. R., Nakano, H., von Caemmerer, S., & Long, S. P. (2002) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.008250 · Cited by 782
Photosynthesis, Grain Yield, and Nitrogen Utilization in Rice and Wheat
Makino, A. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.110.165076 · Cited by 548
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Makino, A., Sakashita, H., Hidema, J., Mae, T., Ojima, K., & Osmond, B.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-12-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1737-1743
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2026446977
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinctive Responses of Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase and Carbonic Anhydrase in Wheat Leaves to Nitrogen Nutrition and their Possible Relationships to CO2-Transfer Resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.100.4.1737
- The paper
- Makino, A., Sakashita, H., Hidema, J., Mae, T., Ojima, K., & Osmond, B. (1992). Distinctive Responses of Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase and Carbonic Anhydrase in Wheat Leaves to Nitrogen Nutrition and their Possible Relationships to CO2-Transfer Resistance. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.100.4.1737
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.