The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Evolution of CONSTANS-Like Gene Families in Barley, Rice, and Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
The CO (CONSTANS) gene of Arabidopsis has an important role in the regulation of flowering by photoperiod. CO is part of a gene family with 17 members that are subdivided into three classes, termed Group I to III here. All members of the family have a CCT (CO,CO-like, TOC1) domain near the carboxy terminus. Group I genes, which include CO, have two zinc finger B-boxes near the amino terminus. Group II genes have one B-box, and Group III genes have one B-box and a second diverged zinc finger. Analysis of rice (Oryza sativa) genomic sequence identified 16 genes (OsA–OsP) that were also divided into these three groups, showing that their evolution predates monocot/dicot divergence. Eight Group I genes (HvCO1–HvCO8) were isolated from barley (Hordeum vulgare), of which two (HvCO1and HvCO2) were highly CO like.HvCO3 and its rice counterpart (OsB) had one B-box that was distantly related to Group II genes and was probably derived by internal deletion of a two B-box Group I gene. Sequence homology and comparative mapping showed that HvCO1 was the counterpart of OsA (Hd1), a major determinant of photoperiod sensitivity in rice. Major genes determining photoperiod response have been mapped in barley and wheat (Triticum aestivum), but none corresponded toCO-like genes. Thus, selection for variation in photoperiod response has affected different genes in rice and temperate cereals. The peptides of HvCO1, HvCO2(barley), and Hd1 (rice) show significant structural differences from CO, particularly amino acid changes that are predicted to abolish B-box2 function, suggesting an evolutionary trend toward a one-B-box structure in the most CO-like cereal genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E., & Maniatis, T. (1989) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias de la Salud · Cited by 133,589
Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual
Deininger, P. (1990) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(90)90595-z · Cited by 84,682
MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software
Kumar, S., Tamura, K., Jakobsen, I. B., & Nei, M. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1244 · Cited by 6,097
A Draft Sequence of the Rice Genome ( Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica )
Yu, J., Hu, S., Wang, J., Wong, G. K.-S., Li, S., Liu, B., Deng, Y., Dai, L., Zhou, Y., Zhang, X., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1068037 · Cited by 4,208
A Draft Sequence of the Rice Genome ( Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica )
Goff, S. A., Ricke, D., Lan, T.-H., Presting, G., Wang, R., Dunn, M., Glazebrook, J., Sessions, A., Oeller, P., Varma, H., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1068275 · Cited by 2,838
A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica) : The rice genome
Yu, J. M., Hu, S., Cao, M., Liu, J., Sun, J., & Tang, J. (2002) · Science · Cited by 1,817
Yano, M., Katayose, Y., Ashikari, M., Yamanouchi, U., Monna, L., Fuse, T., Baba, T., Yamamoto, K., Umehara, Y., Nagamura, Y., et al. (2000) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.12.12.2473 · Cited by 1,585
Putterill, J., Robson, F., Lee, K., Simon, R., & Coupland, G. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90288-0 · Cited by 1,467
Self-citationCONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis
Suárez-López, P., Wheatley, K., Robson, F., Onouchi, H., Valverde, F., & Coupland, G. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35074138 · Cited by 1,463
Self-citationDistinct Roles of CONSTANS Target Genes in Reproductive Development of Arabidopsis
Samach, A., Onouchi, H., Gold, S. E., Ditta, G. S., Schwarz-Sommer, Z., Yanofsky, M. F., & Coupland, G. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5471.1613 · Cited by 1,439
Self-citation
Cited by
Higgins, J. A., Bailey, P. C., & Laurie, D. A. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010065 · Cited by 280
Self-citationZheng, Y., Wang, N., Zhang, Z., Liu, W., & Xie, W. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.877908 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffiths, S., Dunford, R. P., Coupland, G., & Laurie, D. A.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-04-01
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1855-1867
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2098959386
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 22.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolution of CONSTANS-Like Gene Families in Barley, Rice, and Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.102.016188
- The paper
- Griffiths, S., Dunford, R. P., Coupland, G., & Laurie, D. A. (2003). The Evolution of CONSTANS-Like Gene Families in Barley, Rice, and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.102.016188
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.