The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of the Early Response of Arabidopsis to Alternaria brassicicola Infection Using Expression Profiling
Open accessAbstract
All tested accessions of Arabidopsis are resistant to the fungal pathogen Alternaria brassicicola. Resistance is compromised by pad3 or coi1 mutations, suggesting that it requires the Arabidopsis phytoalexin camalexin and jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent signaling, respectively. This contrasts with most well-studied Arabidopsis pathogens, which are controlled by salicylic acid-dependent responses and do not benefit from absence of camalexin or JA. Here, mutants with defects in camalexin synthesis (pad1, pad2, pad3, and pad5) or in JA signaling (pad1, coi1) were found to be more susceptible than wild type. Mutants with defects in salicylic acid (pad4 and sid2) or ethylene (ein2) signaling remained resistant. Plant responses to A. brassicicola were characterized using expression profiling. Plants showed dramatic gene expression changes within 12 h, persisting at 24 and 36 h. Wild-type and pad3 plants responded similarly, suggesting that pad3 does not have a major effect on signaling. The response of coi1 plants was quite different. Of the 645 genes induced by A. brassicicola in wild-type and pad3 plants, 265 required COI1 for full expression. It is likely that some of the COI1-dependent genes are important for resistance to A. brassicicola. Responses to A. brassicicola were compared with responses to Pseudomonas syringae infection. Despite the fact that these pathogens are limited by different defense responses, approximately 50% of the induced genes were induced in response to both pathogens. Among these, requirements for COI1 were consistent after infection by either pathogen, suggesting that the regulatory effect of COI1 is similar regardless of the initial stimulus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Significance of Inducible Defense-related Proteins in Infected Plants
van Loon, L. C., Rep, M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2006) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425 · Cited by 3,410
Wan, J., Tanaka, K., Zhang, X.-C., Son, G. H., Brechenmacher, L., Nguyen, T. H. N., & Stacey, G. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.112.201699 · Cited by 305
Natural Products as Fungicide and Their Role in Crop Protection
Santra, H. K., & Banerjee, D. (2020) · Natural Bioactive Products in Sustainable Agriculture · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3024-1_9 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- van Wees, S. C. M., Chang, H.-S., Zhu, T., & Glazebrook, J.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 606-617
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1855463346
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of the Early Response of Arabidopsis to Alternaria brassicicola Infection Using Expression Profiling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.103.022186
- The paper
- van Wees, S. C. M., Chang, H.-S., Zhu, T., & Glazebrook, J. (2003). Characterization of the Early Response of Arabidopsis to Alternaria brassicicola Infection Using Expression Profiling. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.022186
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.