The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial Volatiles Induce Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, in association with plant roots, can trigger induced systemic resistance (ISR). Considering that low-molecular weight volatile hormone analogues such as methyl jasmonate and methyl salicylate can trigger defense responses in plants, we examined whether volatile organic compounds (VOCs) associated with rhizobacteria can initiate ISR. In Arabidopsis seedlings exposed to bacterial volatile blends from Bacillus subtilis GB03 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens IN937a, disease severity by the bacterial pathogen Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora was significantly reduced compared with seedlings not exposed to bacterial volatiles before pathogen inoculation. Exposure to VOCs from rhizobacteria for as little as 4 d was sufficient to activate ISR in Arabidopsis seedlings. Chemical analysis of the bacterial volatile emissions revealed the release of a series of low-molecular weight hydrocarbons including the growth promoting VOC (2R,3R)-(-)-butanediol. Exogenous application of racemic mixture of (RR) and (SS) isomers of 2,3-butanediol was found to trigger ISR and transgenic lines of B. subtilis that emitted reduced levels of 2,3-butanediol and acetoin conferred reduced Arabidopsis protection to pathogen infection compared with seedlings exposed to VOCs from wild-type bacterial lines. Using transgenic and mutant lines of Arabidopsis, we provide evidence that the signaling pathway activated by volatiles from GB03 is dependent on ethylene, albeit independent of the salicylic acid or jasmonic acid signaling pathways. This study provides new insight into the role of bacteria VOCs as initiators of defense responses in plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Together these compounds function as signaling molecules (Fig. 7) and elicitors of tolerance to abiotic stressors (drought, salinity or nutrient imbalance) in a process termed induced systemic tolerance (IST) (Yang et al., 2009) as well as in triggering the host plant immune system in a process termed induced systemic resistance (ISR) (Ryu et al., 2004).”
From Intensify production, transform biomass to energy and novel goods and protect soils in Europe—A vision how to mobilize marginal lands (2018) · cites this paper as Ryu et al., 2004
In the citing paper
“Induction of ISR and subsequent signaling cascades results in accelerated responses to pathogen intrusion (Ryu et al., 2004;Van der Ent et al., 2009).”
From Intensify production, transform biomass to energy and novel goods and protect soils in Europe—A vision how to mobilize marginal lands (2018) · cites this paper as Ryu et al., 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria
Glick, B. R. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/m95-015 · Cited by 2,669
SYSTEMIC RESISTANCE INDUCED BY RHIZOSPHERE BACTERIA
van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (1998) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.453 · Cited by 2,366
Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence
Wildermuth, M. C., Dewdney, J., Wu, G., & Ausubel, F. M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35107108 · Cited by 2,333
Defensive Function of Herbivore-Induced Plant Volatile Emissions in Nature
Keßler, A., & Baldwin, I. T. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5511.2141 · Cited by 2,191
Ryals, J. A., Neuenschwander, U. H., Willits, M. G., Molina, A., Steiner, H., & Hunt, D. M. (1996) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.8.10.1809 · Cited by 2,060
Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis
Ryu, C., Farag, M. A., Hu, C., Reddy, M. S., Wei, H., Paré, P. W., & Kloepper, J. W. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0730845100 · Cited by 1,661
Self-citationCOI1 : An Arabidopsis Gene Required for Jasmonate-Regulated Defense and Fertility
Xie, D., Feys, B., James, S., Nieto‐Rostro, M., & Turner, J. G. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5366.1091 · Cited by 1,657
Cao, H., Bowling, S. A., Gordon, A., & Dong, X. (1994) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.6.11.1583 · Cited by 1,495
EIN2, a Bifunctional Transducer of Ethylene and Stress Responses in Arabidopsis
Alonso, J. M., Hirayama, T., Roman, G., Nourizadeh, S., & Ecker, J. R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5423.2148 · Cited by 1,317
Plant Volatiles as a Defense against Insect Herbivores
Paré, P. W., & Tumlinson, J. H. (1999) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.121.2.325 · Cited by 1,217
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE ROLE OF ROOT EXUDATES IN RHIZOSPHERE INTERACTIONS WITH PLANTS AND OTHER ORGANISMS
Bais, H. P., Weir, T. L., Perry, L. G., Gilroy, S., & Vivanco, J. M. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105159 · Cited by 4,682
Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 · Cited by 3,308
Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes
Pieterse, C. M. J., Zamioudis, C., Berendsen, R. L., Weller, D. M., Van Wees, S. C. M., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2014) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340 · Cited by 3,272
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture
Bhattacharyya, P. N., & Jha, D. K. (2011) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9 · Cited by 2,922
Mendes, R., Garbeva, P., & Raaijmakers, J. M. (2013) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12028 · Cited by 2,945
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryu, C.-M., Farag, M. A., Hu, C.-H., Reddy, M. S., Kloepper, J. W., & Paré, P. W.
- Affiliations
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, 209 Life Sciences Building, Auburn, Alabama 36849 (C.-M.R., C.-H.H., M.S.R., J.W.K.); and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, 1 Chemistry Drive; Lubbock, Texas 79409 (M.A.F., P.W.P.)
- Venue
- PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1017-1026
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- PMC
- PMC389924
- OpenAlex
- W2123767496
- Cited by
- 1,308
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 47
- FWCI
- 25.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Welch Foundation
- Ohio State University
- Herman Frasch Foundation for Chemical Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
- Keywords
- bacterial volatiles, induced systemic resistance, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora, 2,3-butanediol, acetoin, ethylene signaling, plant defense response, Arabidopsis thaliana, low molecular weight hydrocarbons
- MeSH terms
- Butylene Glycols, Mutation, Plant Diseases, Rhizobiaceae, Symbiosis, Volatilization, Signal Transduction, Arabidopsis, Plants, Genetically Modified
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
