The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Homology Modeling of Representative Subfamilies of Arabidopsis Major Intrinsic Proteins. Classification Based on the Aromatic/Arginine Selectivity Filter
Open accessAbstract
Major intrinsic proteins (MIPs) are a family of membrane channels that facilitate the bidirectional transport of water and small uncharged solutes such as glycerol. The 35 full-length members of the MIP family in Arabidopsis are segregated into four structurally homologous subfamilies: plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs), tonoplast intrinsic proteins (TIPs), nodulin 26-like intrinsic membrane proteins (NIPs), and small basic intrinsic proteins (SIPs). Computational methods were used to construct structural models of the putative pore regions of various plant MIPs based on homology modeling with the atomic resolution crystal structures of mammalian aquaporin 1 and the bacterial glycerol permease GlpF. Based on comparisons of the narrow selectivity filter regions (the aromatic/Arg [ar/R] filter), the members of the four phylogenetic subfamilies of Arabidopsis MIPs can be classified into eight groups. PIPs possess a uniform ar/R signature characteristic of high water transport aquaporins, whereas TIPs are highly diverse with three separate conserved ar/R regions. NIPs possess two separate conserved ar/R regions, one that is similar to the archetype, soybean (Glycine max) nodulin 26, and another that is characteristic of Arabidopsis NIP6;1. The SIP subfamily possesses two ar/R subgroups, characteristic of either SIP1 or SIP2. Both SIP ar/R residues are divergent from all other MIPs in plants and other kingdoms. Overall, these findings suggest that higher plant MIPs have a common fold but show distinct differences in proposed pore apertures, potential to form hydrogen bonds with transported molecules, and amphiphilicity that likely results in divergent transport selectivities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climatic Impact of Tropical Lowland Deforestation on Nearby Montane Cloud Forests
Lawton, R. O., Nair, U. S., Pielke, R. A., & Welch, R. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062459 · Cited by 1,169
Structural basis of water-specific transport through the AQP1 water channel
Sui, H., Han, B.-G., Lee, J. K., Walian, P., & Jap, B. K. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/414872a · Cited by 1,166
Cited by
Maurel, C., Boursiac, Y., Luu, D.-T., Santoni, V., Shahzad, Z., & Verdoucq, L. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2015 · Cited by 940
Unexpected complexity of the Aquaporin gene family in the moss Physcomitrella patens
Danielson, J. Å., & Johanson, U. (2008) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-8-45 · Cited by 409
Consensus in silico computational modelling of the p22phox subunit of the NADPH oxidase
Meijles, D. N., Howlin, B. J., & Li, J.-M. (2012) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2012.05.001 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallace, I. S., & Roberts, D. M.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1059-1068
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2138734970
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Homology Modeling of Representative Subfamilies of Arabidopsis Major Intrinsic Proteins. Classification Based on the Aromatic/Arginine Selectivity Filter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.103.033415
- The paper
- Wallace, I. S., & Roberts, D. M. (2004). Homology Modeling of Representative Subfamilies of Arabidopsis Major Intrinsic Proteins. Classification Based on the Aromatic/Arginine Selectivity Filter. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.033415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.