Cited by 563Photosynthetic Processes and MechanismsPlant Stress Responses and TolerancePlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Relationship between the Heat Tolerance of Photosynthesis and the Thermal Stability of Rubisco Activase in Plants from Contrasting Thermal Environments

Open access
Salvucci, Michael E., Crafts-Brandner, Steven J.·2004·Plant Physiology

Abstract

Inhibition of net photosynthesis (Pn) by moderate heat stress has been attributed to an inability of Rubisco activase to maintain Rubisco in an active form. To examine this proposal, the temperature response of Pn, Rubisco activation, chlorophyll fluorescence, and the activities of Rubisco and Rubisco activase were examined in species from contrasting environments. The temperature optimum of Rubisco activation was 10 degrees C higher in the creosote bush (Larrea tridentata) compared with the Antarctic hairgrass (Deschampsia antarctica), resembling the temperature response of Pn. Pn increased markedly with increasing internal CO(2) concentration in Antarctic hairgrass and creosote bush plants subjected to moderate heat stress even under nonphotorespiratory conditions. Nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence, the effective quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion (DeltaF/F(m)') and the maximum yield of PSII (F(v)/F(m)) were more sensitive to temperature in Antarctic hairgrass and two other species endemic to cold regions (i.e. Lysipomia pumila and spinach [Spinacea oleracea]) compared with creosote bush and three species (i.e. jojoba [Simmondsia chinensis], tobacco [Nicotiana tabacum], and cotton [Gossypium hirsutum]) from warm regions. The temperature response of activity and the rate of catalytic inactivation of Rubisco from creosote bush and Antarctic hairgrass were similar, whereas the optimum for ATP hydrolysis and Rubisco activation by recombinant c…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.103.038323

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 53 · Cited by 563

Authors
Salvucci, M. E., & Crafts-Brandner, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Western Cotton Research Laboratory, Phoenix, Arizona 85040
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
134
Issue
4
Pages
1460-1470
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2101552670
Cited by
563
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 28
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
Rubisco activase, heat tolerance, photosynthesis, Rubisco activation, heat stress, thermal stability, Larrea tridentata, Deschampsia antarctica, chlorophyll fluorescence, non-photochemical quenching, photorespiration, ATP hydrolysis, endemism, optimal temperature
MeSH terms
Acclimatization, Adenosine Triphosphate, Carbon Dioxide, Chlorophyll, Enzyme Activation, Enzyme Stability, Hot Temperature, Molecular Sequence Data, Photosynthesis, Plant Proteins, Plants, Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase, Photosynthetic Reaction Center Complex Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review