The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TILLING. Traditional Mutagenesis Meets Functional Genomics
Open accessAbstract
Most of the genes of an organism are known from sequence, but most of the phenotypes are obscure. Thus, reverse genetics has become an important goal for many biologists. However, reverse-genetic methodologies are not similarly applicable to all organisms. In the general strategy for reverse genetics that we call TILLING (for Targeting Induced Local Lesions in Genomes), traditional chemical mutagenesis is followed by high-throughput screening for point mutations. TILLING promises to be generally applicable. Furthermore, because TILLING does not involve transgenic modifications, it is attractive not only for functional genomics but also for agricultural applications. Here, we present an overview of the status of TILLING methodology, including Ecotilling, which entails detection of natural variation. We describe public TILLING efforts in Arabidopsis and other organisms, including maize (Zea mays) and zebrafish. We conclude that TILLING, a technology developed in plants, is rapidly being adopted in other systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Expression profiling reveals off-target gene regulation by RNAi
Jackson, A. L., Bartz, S. R., Schelter, J., Kobayashi, S. V., Burchard, J., Mao, M., Li, B., Cavet, G., & Linsley, P. S. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt831 · Cited by 2,370
Cited by
SIFT missense predictions for genomes
Vaser, R., Adusumalli, S., Leng, S. N., Sikic, M., & Ng, P. C. (2016) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2015.123 · Cited by 1,510
UTILLdb, a Pisum sativum in silicoforward and reverse genetics tool
Dalmais, M., Schmidt, J., Le Signor, C., Moussy, F., Burstin, J., Savois, V., Aubert, G., Brunaud, V., de Oliveira, Y., Guichard, C., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-r43 · Cited by 187
Functional assessment of human coding mutations affecting skin pigmentation using zebrafish
Tsetskhladze, Z. R., Canfield, V. A., Ang, K. C., Wentzel, S. M., Reid, K. P., Berg, A. S., Johnson, S. L., Kawakami, K., & Cheng, K. C. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047398 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Henikoff, S., Till, B. J., & Comai, L.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 630-636
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2110364996
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TILLING. Traditional Mutagenesis Meets Functional Genomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.104.041061
- The paper
- Henikoff, S., Till, B. J., & Comai, L. (2004). TILLING. Traditional Mutagenesis Meets Functional Genomics. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.041061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.