The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diurnal Changes in the Transcriptome Encoding Enzymes of Starch Metabolism Provide Evidence for Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Regulation of Starch Metabolism in Arabidopsis Leaves
Open accessAbstract
To gain insight into the synthesis and functions of enzymes of starch metabolism in leaves of Arabidopsis L. Heynth, Affymetrix microarrays were used to analyze the transcriptome throughout the diurnal cycle. Under the conditions employed, transitory leaf starch is degraded progressively during a 12-h dark period, and then accumulates during the following 12-h light period. Transcripts encoding enzymes of starch synthesis changed relatively little in amount over 24 h except for two starch synthases, granule bound starch synthase and starch synthase II, which increased appreciably during the transition from dark to light. The increase in RNA encoding granule-bound starch synthase may reflect the extensive destruction of starch granules in the dark. Transcripts encoding several enzymes putatively involved in starch breakdown showed a coordinated decline in the dark followed by rapid accumulation in the light. Despite marked changes in their transcript levels, the amounts of some enzymes of starch metabolism do not change appreciably through the diurnal cycle. Posttranscriptional regulation is essential in the maintenance of amounts of enzymes and the control of their activities in vivo. Even though the relationships between transcript levels, enzyme activity, and diurnal metabolism of starch metabolism are complex, the presence of some distinctive diurnal patterns of transcripts for enzymes known to be involved in starch metabolism facilitates the identification of other proteins that may participate in this process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene expression analysis by massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) on microbead arrays.
Brenner, S., Johnson, M., Bridgham, J., Golda, G., Lloyd, D. H., Johnson, D., Luo, S., McCurdy, S., Foy, M., Ewan, M., et al. (2000) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/76469 · Cited by 1,360
Cited by
Bläsing, O. E., Gibon, Y., Günther, M., Höhne, M., Morcuende, R., Osuna, D., Thimm, O., Usadel, B., Scheible, W.-R., & Stitt, M. (2005) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.105.035261 · Cited by 699
Expression profiling of genes involved in starch synthesis in sink and source organs of rice
Ohdan, T., Francisco, P. B., Sawada, T., Hirose, T., Terao, T., Satoh, H., & Nakamura, Y. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eri292 · Cited by 458
Formation of starch in plant cells
Pfister, B., & Zeeman, S. C. (2016) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2250-x · Cited by 423
Self-citationRegulation of starch biosynthesis in response to a fluctuating environment
Geigenberger, P. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.110.170399 · Cited by 348
GIBON, Y., PYL, E., SULPICE, R., LUNN, J. E., HÖHNE, M., GÜNTHER, M., & STITT, M. (2009) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01965.x · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, S. M., Fulton, D. C., Chia, T., Thorneycroft, D., Chapple, A., Dunstan, H., Hylton, C., Zeeman, S. C., & Smith, A. M.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2687-2699
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2018902666
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.