The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low Temperature Induction of Arabidopsis CBF1 , 2 , and 3 Is Gated by the Circadian Clock
Open accessAbstract
Exposing Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants to low temperature results in rapid induction of CBF1, 2, and 3 (CBF1-3; also known as DREB1B, C, and A, respectively), which encode transcriptional activators that induce expression of a battery of genes that increase plant freezing and chilling tolerance. Recently, it has been shown that basal levels of CBF3 transcripts and those of certain CBF-regulated genes exhibit circadian cycling. Here, we further explored the regulation of CBF1-3 by the circadian clock. The results indicated that the extent to which CBF1-3 transcripts accumulated in response to low temperature was dependent on the time of day that the plants were exposed to low temperature and that this was regulated by the circadian clock. The highest and lowest levels of cold-induced CBF1-3 transcript accumulation occurred at 4 and 16 h after subjective dawn, respectively. An analysis of CBF2 promoter-reporter gene fusions indicated that this control included transcriptional regulation. In addition, the cold responsiveness of RAV1 and ZAT12, genes that are cold induced in parallel with CBF1-3, was also subject to circadian regulation. However, whereas the maximum level of cold-induced RAV1 transcript accumulation occurred at the same time of day as did CBF1-3 transcripts, that of ZAT12 was in reverse phase, i.e. the highest level of cold-induced ZAT12 transcript accumulation occurred 16 h after subjective dawn. These results indicate that cold-induced expression of CBF1-3, RAV1, and ZAT12 is gated by the circadian clock and suggest that this regulation likely occurs through at least two nonidentical (though potentially overlapping) signaling pathways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Liu, Q., Kasuga, M., Sakuma, Y., Abe, H., Miura, S., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (1998) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.10.8.1391 · Cited by 3,044
Stockinger, E. J., Gilmour, S. J., & Thomashow, M. F. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.3.1035 · Cited by 1,807
Self-citation
Cited by
AP2/ERF family transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses
Mizoi, J., Shinozaki, K., & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2012) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms · doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.08.004 · Cited by 1,448
Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants
Lata, C., & Prasad, M. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err210 · Cited by 1,016
Franklin, K. A. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02507.x · Cited by 801
The Circadian System in Higher Plants
Harmer, S. L. (2009) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092054 · Cited by 719
Saibo, N. J. M., Lourenço, T., & Oliveira, M. M. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn227 · Cited by 483
Metadata
- Authors
- Fowler, S. G., Cook, D., & Thomashow, M. F.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-03-01
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 961-968
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2108818769
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low Temperature Induction of Arabidopsis CBF1 , 2 , and 3 Is Gated by the Circadian Clock. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.104.058354
- The paper
- Fowler, S. G., Cook, D., & Thomashow, M. F. (2005). Low Temperature Induction of Arabidopsis CBF1 , 2 , and 3 Is Gated by the Circadian Clock. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.058354
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.