Cited by 135Plant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation

Auxin Dynamics after Decapitation Are Not Correlated with the Initial Growth of Axillary Buds

Open access
Morris, Suzanne E., Cox, Marjolein C.H., Ross, John J., Krisantini, Santi, Beveridge, Christine A.·2005·Plant Physiology

Abstract

One of the first and most enduring roles identified for the plant hormone auxin is the mediation of apical dominance. Many reports have claimed that reduced stem indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) levels and/or reduced basipetal IAA transport directly or indirectly initiate bud growth in decapitated plants. We have tested whether auxin inhibits the initial stage of bud release, or subsequent stages, in garden pea (Pisum sativum) by providing a rigorous examination of the dynamics of auxin level, auxin transport, and axillary bud growth. We demonstrate that after decapitation, initial bud growth occurs prior to changes in IAA level or transport in surrounding stem tissue and is not prevented by an acropetal supply of exogenous auxin. We also show that auxin transport inhibitors cause a similar auxin depletion as decapitation, but do not stimulate bud growth within our experimental time-frame. These results indicate that decapitation may trigger initial bud growth via an auxin-independent mechanism. We propose that auxin operates after this initial stage, mediating apical dominance via autoregulation of buds that are already in transition toward sustained growth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.104.058743

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Normal auxin transport may only be required for ongoing bud growth rather than being the initial trigger of bud release.

    “Apart from other possible side effects of NPA, these data suggest that normal auxin transport may only be required for ongoing bud growth rather than being the initial trigger of bud release (Fig. 6; Morris et al., 2005;Dun et al., 2006) and that strigolactone and NPA act quite differently.”

    From Strigolactone Acts Downstream of Auxin to Regulate Bud Outgrowth in Pea and Arabidopsis (2009) · cites this paper as Morris et al., 2005

    The Discussion reports that initial axillary bud growth in pea is not correlated with auxin depletion and places auxin’s role at a later, sustained-growth stage. It does not establish that normal auxin transport is required for ongoing bud growth; rather, it says a lack of auxin allows sustained outgrowth after decapitation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • IAA applied to the shoot apex of intact pea and Arabidopsis plants moved down the stem or inflorescence at the speed of polar auxin transport, approximately 1 cm h−1.

    “As shown previously for pea, this treatment led to a wave of IAA that moved down the stem at the speed of polar auxin transport (1 cm h 21 ; Fig. 4, A-E; Morris et al., 2005;Ferguson and Beveridge, 2009).”
  • In decapitated pea plants, buds start to grow out before auxin concentrations in the associated nodal stem are diminished due to removal of the apical auxin source.

    “In decapitated pea plants, buds start to grow out before auxin concentrations in the associated nodal stem are diminished due to removal of the apical auxin source (Morris et al., 2005).”

    From Shaping plant architecture (2015) · cites this paper as Morris et al., 2005

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 135

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Jones SE, Demeo JS, Davies NW, Noonan SE, Ross JJ (2005) Stems of the Arabidopsis pin1-1 mutant are not deficient in free indole-3-acetic acid. Planta (in press)

Authors
Morris, S. E., Cox, M. C. H., Ross, J. J., Krisantini, S., & Beveridge, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Tasmania (AU)
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2005-06-17
Volume
138
Issue
3
Pages
1665-1672
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2102986073
Cited by
135
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • Australian Agency for International Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Keywords
auxin, apical dominance, decapitation, axillary bud outgrowth, indole-3-acetic acid, auxin transport, auxin transport inhibitors, Pisum sativum
MeSH terms
Indoleacetic Acids, Kinetics, Pisum sativum, Plant Stems, Flowers, Seedlings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review