The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phytochrome B and at Least One Other Phytochrome Mediate the Accelerated Flowering Response of Arabidopsis thaliana L. to Low Red/Far-Red Ratio
Open accessAbstract
We have investigated the involvement of phytochrome B in the early-flowering response of Arabidopsis thaliana L. seedlings to low red:far-red (R/FR) ratio light conditions. The phytochrome B-deficient hy3 (phyB) mutant is early flowering, and in this regard it resembles the shade-avoidance phenotype of its isogenic wild type. Seedlings carrying the hy2 mutation, resulting in a deficiency of phytochrome chromophore and hence of active phytochromes, also flower earlier than wild-type plants. Whereas hy3 or hy2 seedlings show only a slight acceleration of flowering in response to low R/FR ratio, seedlings that are doubly homozygous for both mutations flower earlier than seedlings carrying either phytochrome-related mutation alone. This additive effect clearly indicates the involvement of one or more phytochrome species in addition to phytochrome B in the flowering response as well as indicating the presence of some functional phytochrome B in hy2 seedlings. Seedlings that are homozygous for the hy3 mutation and one of the fca, fwa, or co late-flowering mutations display a pronounced early-flowering response to low R/FR ratio. A similar response to low R/FR ratio is displayed by seedlings doubly homozygous for the hy2 mutation and any one of the late-flowering mutations. Thus, placing the hy3 or hy2 mutations into a late-flowering background has the effect of uncovering a flowering response to low R/FR ratio. Seedlings that are triply homozygous for the hy3, hy2 mutations and a late-flowering mutation flower earlier than the double mutants and do not respond to low R/FR ratio. Thus, the observed flowering responses to low R/FR ratio in phytochrome B-deficient mutants can be attributed to the action of at least one other phytochrome species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Franklin, K. A. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02507.x · Cited by 801
The shade avoidance syndrome: multiple responses mediated by multiple phytochromes
SMITH, H., & WHITELAM, G. C. (1997) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-104.x · Cited by 722
Self-citationRegulation of flowering time by light quality
Cerdán, P. D., & Chory, J. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01636 · Cited by 543
GENETIC CONTROL OF FLOWERING TIME IN ARABIDOPSIS
Koornneef, M., Alonso-Blanco, C., Peeters, A. J. M., & Soppe, W. (1998) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.345 · Cited by 522
Self-citationCasal, J. J. (2012) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0157 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Halliday, K. J., Koornneef, M., & Whitelam, G. C.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-04-01
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1311-1315
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2146854296
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytochrome B and at Least One Other Phytochrome Mediate the Accelerated Flowering Response of Arabidopsis thaliana L. to Low Red/Far-Red Ratio. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.104.4.1311
- The paper
- Halliday, K. J., Koornneef, M., & Whitelam, G. C. (1994). Phytochrome B and at Least One Other Phytochrome Mediate the Accelerated Flowering Response of Arabidopsis thaliana L. to Low Red/Far-Red Ratio. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.4.1311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.