Cited by 102Light effects on plantsPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsPlant Molecular Biology Research

A Plant-Specific Protein Essential for Blue-Light-Induced Chloroplast Movements

DeBlasio, Stacy L., Luesse, Darron L., Hangarter, Roger P.·2005·Plant Physiology

Abstract

In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), light-dependent chloroplast movements are induced by blue light. When exposed to low fluence rates of light, chloroplasts accumulate in periclinal layers perpendicular to the direction of light, presumably to optimize light absorption by exposing more chloroplast area to the light. Under high light conditions, chloroplasts become positioned parallel to the incoming light in a response that can reduce exposure to light intensities that may damage the photosynthetic machinery. To identify components of the pathway downstream of the photoreceptors that mediate chloroplast movements (i.e. phototropins), we conducted a mutant screen that has led to the isolation of several Arabidopsis mutants displaying altered chloroplast movements. The plastid movement impaired1 (pmi1) mutant exhibits severely attenuated chloroplast movements under all tested fluence rates of light, suggesting that it is a necessary component for both the low- and high-light-dependant chloroplast movement responses. Analysis of pmi1 leaf cross sections revealed that regardless of the light condition, chloroplasts are more evenly distributed in leaf mesophyll cells than in the wild type. The pmi1-1 mutant was found to contain a single nonsense mutation within the open reading frame of At1g42550. This gene encodes a plant-specific protein of unknown function that appears to be conserved among angiosperms. Sequence analysis of the protein suggests that it may be involved in calcium-mediated signal transduction, possibly through protein–protein interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.105.061887

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 102

Authors
DeBlasio, S. L., Luesse, D. L., & Hangarter, R. P.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2005-08-19
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
101-114
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2067647886
Cited by
102
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
chloroplast movement, blue light, phototropin, Arabidopsis thaliana, calcium signaling, protein-protein interaction
MeSH terms
Actins, Amino Acid Sequence, Chloroplasts, Color, Cytoskeleton, Light, Molecular Sequence Data, Movement, Mutation, Signal Transduction, Sequence Alignment, Arabidopsis, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Plant Leaves, Arabidopsis Proteins, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review