Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Feeding Spodoptera littoralis on Lima Bean Leaves. III. Membrane Depolarization and Involvement of Hydrogen Peroxide

Open access
Maffei, Massimo E., Mithöfer, Axel, Arimura, Gen-Ichiro, Uchtenhagen, Hannes, Bossi, Simone, Bertea, Cinzia M., Cucuzza, Laura Starvaggi, Novero, Mara, Volpe, Veronica, Quadro, Stefano, Boland, Wilhelm·2006·Plant Physiology

Abstract

In response to herbivore (Spodoptera littoralis) attack, lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) leaves produced hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in concentrations that were higher when compared to mechanically damaged (MD) leaves. Cellular and subcellular localization analyses revealed that H2O2 was mainly localized in MD and herbivore-wounded (HW) zones and spread throughout the veins and tissues. Preferentially, H2O2 was found in cell walls of spongy and mesophyll cells facing intercellular spaces, even though confocal laser scanning microscopy analyses also revealed the presence of H2O2 in mitochondria/peroxisomes. Increased gene and enzyme activations of superoxide dismutase after HW were in agreement with confocal laser scanning microscopy data. After MD, additional application of H2O2 prompted a transient transmembrane potential (V m) depolarization, with a V m depolarization rate that was higher when compared to HW leaves. In transgenic soybean (Glycine max) suspension cells expressing the Ca2+-sensing aequorin system, increasing amounts of added H2O2 correlated with a higher cytosolic calcium ([Ca2+]cyt) concentration. In MD and HW leaves, H2O2 also triggered the increase of [Ca2+]cyt, but MD-elicited [Ca2+]cyt increase was more pronounced when compared to HW leaves after addition of exogenous H2O2. The results clearly indicate that V m depolarization caused by HW makes the membrane potential more positive and reduces the ability of lima bean leaves to react to signaling molecules.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.105.071993

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Maffei, M. E., Mithöfer, A., Arimura, G.-I., Uchtenhagen, H., Bossi, S., Bertea, C. M., Cucuzza, L. S., Novero, M., Volpe, V., Quadro, S., & Boland, W.
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2006-01-27
Volume
140
Issue
3
Pages
1022-1035
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2078597696
Cited by
218
References
1
FWCI
13.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Feeding Spodoptera littoralis on Lima Bean Leaves. III. Membrane Depolarization and Involvement of Hydrogen Peroxide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.105.071993
The paper
Maffei, M. E., Mithöfer, A., Arimura, G.-I., Uchtenhagen, H., Bossi, S., Bertea, C. M., Cucuzza, L. S., Novero, M., Volpe, V., Quadro, S., & Boland, W. (2006). Effects of Feeding Spodoptera littoralis on Lima Bean Leaves. III. Membrane Depolarization and Involvement of Hydrogen Peroxide. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.071993

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.